Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00095-CV SATURN AVIATION, LLC, Appellant v. BMH AIR, LLC and Evolution Jets, LLC, Ap

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-22-00432-CV __________________ USA TODAY A/K/A GANNETT CO., INC., GANNETT PUBLISHING SERVICES, LLC, AND GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION NETWORK, LLC, Appellants V.

ACCEPTED 08-24-00024-CV 08-24-00024-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 10/30/2024 3:34 PM

693 S.E.2d 815 (2010) Heather RUCKDESCHEL, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas G. Miller, Jr., Plaintiff Below, v. FALCON DRILLING COMPANY, L.L.C., and Texas Keystone, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellees, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 34865. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted February 9, 2010. Decided

DAVIS, Justice, concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part: (Filed Nov. 18, 2013) It has been said that “ ‘[t]he law does not require parents to be perfeet[.]’” In re: Q.A.H. v. M.H., — S.W.3d -,-, No. WD 75786, 2013 WL 3661746, at *14 (Mo.Ct.App. July 16, 2013) (quoting In re: S.M.H. v. T.H., 160 S.W.3d 355, 372 (Mo.2005)). Accord Bree

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2013 Term ____________ FILED October 17, 2013 No. 13-0159 released at 3:00 p.m. ____________ RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

849 A.2d 63 (2004) 157 Md. App. 40 MIDDLEBROOK TECH, LLC v. Roger H. MOORE. No. 1104, Sept. Term, 2003. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 7, 2004. *66 Greg R. Saber (Robert S. Selzer, Selzer, Gurvitch, Rabin & Obeeny, Chtd., on brief), Bethesda, for appellant. Dawn White, Berkeley Spring

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ALBERTO M. RUIZ DE GAMBOA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. NEWTH GARDENS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 4D2024-0217 [June 4, 2025] Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicia

III. DISCUSSION The Does claim that removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) was improper because (i) the Defendants did not all consent to the removal and (ii) the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Pls.' Mot. Remand 1-3. Because the Defendants have not satisfied their burden of demonstrating compliance wi

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. *1158In this appeal, Bonni J. Genzer, a rideshare driver for Uber Technologies, Inc., contends that James River Insurance Company, Uber's insurer, breached its contractual obligations by declining coverage for injuries she sustained in an accident on the return leg of a lengthy fare. Genzer also contends that, under

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE DANIEL MCCULLEN, ) No. ED110811 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. ) 22SL-CC01555

NO. 12-24-00084-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DEBRA CHRISTIAN AND THE § APPEAL FROM THE 188TH CHRISTIAN LIVING TRUST, APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ACIREMA CORPORATION, TOG ENERGY, M-C PRODUCTION AND DRILLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BARBARA SOPKIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-0743 (TSC) ) ) JOHN LOPATTO,

BACKGROUND This is the third action premised on the same theory of liability that this court has considered. On two prior occasions, this court has detailed plaintiffs' theory of liability at length. See Coffey v. Ripple Labs Inc., 333 F. Supp. 3d 952, 954 (N.D. Cal. 2018) ; Greenw

PICKETT, Judge. LA maritime employer appeals the trial court’s awards of penalties and attorney fees to a seaman for the employer’s failure to pay maintenance and cure for almost two and one-half years after the seaman was injured. Finding no manifest error in the trial court’s determination that the employer’s failure to pay maintenance and cure more promptly was arbitrary and capricious, we affirm the award of penalties in

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-22-00383-CV ________________ TATIANA TELEGINA, Appellant V. VALADIMIR NECHAYUK, Appellee ____________________________________________________________________

13 So.3d 717 (2009) Linda THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOLLYWOOD CASINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 44,271-WCA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 13, 2009. *719 Law Offices of Ronald F. Lattier, LLC, by Ronald F. Lattier, Curtis R. Joseph, Jr., Shreveport, for Appellant. Fischer & Associates, by Mark K.

OPINION SHARON G. LEE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ„ joined. A jury found that an employer retaliated against an employee in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Tennessee Human Rig

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court is a Motion by Third Party Defendants Lawyer’s Title Insurance Corporation (“Lawyer’s Title”), Helen Sullivan, and Realty Concepts, Ltd. (“Realty Concepts”), for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 328) and a Renewed Motion by Third Party Defendants Colliers International Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC (“Colliers

Post-Award Bid Protest; Cardinal Change Doctrine; Whether an Out-of-Scope Modification of the Awardee’s Contract Occurred; Laches. OPINION AND ORDER Bush, Judge. Plaintiff Aircraft Charter Solutions, Inc. (ACS) filed its post-award bid protest complaint and requests for injunctive relief on January 4, 2013. In its complaint, plai