Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 22 2019, 8:38 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

BOLIN, Justice. WRIT QUASHED. NO OPINION. MOORE, C.J., and MAIN and BRYAN, JJ., concur. MURDOCK, J., concurs specially.

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Charlie Mills a/k/a Charles Mills (“Mills”) and Salera Capital Management, LLC (“Salera,” and collectively with Mills, the “Plaintiffs”), through their First Amended Complaint, dated Aug. 12, 2016 (“FAC”) (ECF Doc. # 16),1 seek money <

The petitioner, Jamie Ray Mills, was convicted of three counts of capital murder for the killings of Floyd Hill and Vera Hill, and he was sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals ultimately affirmed Mills's convictions and sentences.See Mills v. State, 62 So.3d 553 (Ala.Crim. App. 2008) (remanding with instructions) ("Mills I"); Mills v.State, [Ms. CR-06-2246, Sept. 26, 2008] ___ So.3d ___

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 217.

Lisa R. Mills ("the mother") and Robert F. Dailey ("the father") were divorced in 1987. They had two children, whose physical custody was vested in the mother. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties to remedy omissions in the divorce judgment, the parties agreed that any noncovered medical, dental, optical, and orthodontic expenses (hereinafter referred to as "medical expenses") for the children would be divided equally; the agreement stated that the father would pay his half of

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL August 15, 2023 524 AUGUST, 2023 347 Conn. 524 Mills v. Hartford HealthCare Corp. KRISTIN MILLS, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF CHERYL MILLS) v. HARTFORD HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ET AL. (SC 20763) (SC 20764) (SC

PER CURIAM. Petitioner’s direct appeal was dismissed when no response was received to an order requiring payment of the filing fee and completion of a docketing statement. We grant the petition for belated appeal and hereby reinstate the appeal in case number 1D05-0386. See Hardy v. State, 822 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that appellate counsel’s failure to file a

771 F.Supp.2d 270 (2009) Howard MILLS, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, in his capacity as Rehabilitator of Frontier Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY and Benfield Inc., f/k/a E.W. Blanch Co., Defendants. No. 7:05-cv-8928 (WWE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 28, 2009.

ROSENBLUM, J. Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) that reversed the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) order awarding benefits, assessing a penalty against employer, and granting attorney fees. We affirm. On May 5, 2003, while working for employer, claimant slipped off a ladder and fell approximately three feet. He sought medical treatment for his right hip from D

Wehadkee Yarn Mills ("Wehadkee") appeals from a judgment of the Talladega Circuit Court ("the trial court") finding that Deborah Harris had suffered a permanent and total disability as a result of her on-the-job injury while working for Wehadkee. We reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case to the trial court. Facts Harris, who was born on December 4, 1958, testified that she dropped out of school after she completed the eighth grade. Acc

623 F.Supp.2d 447 (2009) Howard MILLS, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, in his capacity as Rehabilitator of Frontier Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY and Benfield Inc., f/k/a E.W. Blanch Co., Defendants. No. 7:05-cv-8928 (WWE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 6, 2009. *

BOLIN, Justice. Dixon Mills Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. (“the fire department”), and its assistant fire chief, Louis Cass White (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the petitioners”), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Marengo Circuit Court to vacate its order denying the petitioners’ motion for a summary judgment on the basis of immunity as to- the negligence claims asserted against them -by L

260 S.W.3d 672 (2008) Teddy James SMITH and Sandra Smith, Appellants v. MOHAWK MILLS, INC., Appellee. No. 05-07-00989-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. July 29, 2008. *673 William T. Wilson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, LTD., Temple, for Appellant. Clayton E. Devin, Noreen A. Grant, Bryan Rutherford, MacDonald Devin

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: This appeal is the latest in a series of appeals which deal with the same factual and legal claims between the same parties. For ease of reference, these are defined as follows: (1) Brown v. Bryan County, 53 F.3d 1410 (5th Cir.1995) (hereinafter “Brown I ”) (2) Brown v. Bryan County, 67 F.3d

410 F.Supp.2d 243 (2006) Howard MILLS, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, in His Capacity as Rehabilitator of Frontier Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY and Benfield Inc., f/k/a E.W. Blanch Co., Defendants. No. 05 Civ.8928 CM. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 23, 2006. *2

ORDER OF REMAND This cause came on for hearing before the court on June 16, 2004. The Supreme Court of the United States has now granted certiorari in Raich v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir.2003), cert. granted — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2909, — L.Ed.2d - (2004), which is a related case dealing with the growing and use of marijuana for medicinal purpo

OSCN Found Document:MILLS et al. v. FUHRMANN et al. Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print