Cases

Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 25A1314 _________________ WES ALLEN, ALABAMA SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL. v. EVAN MILLIGAN, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY _________________ No. 25A1315

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–109 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 8, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

[Cite as Allen v. Milligan, 2023-Ohio-917.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY ELIZABETH ALLEN ET AL., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. ELIZA GLOVER MILLIGAN ET AL., Defendants

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

197 Mich. App. 665 (1992) 496 N.W.2d 394 MILLIGAN v. MILLIGAN Docket No. 135292. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided December 29, 1992, at 9:25 A.M. Katherine L. Barnart, P.C. (by Constance J. Allen), for the plaintiff. KLH, P.C. (by Daniel J. Henry, Jr.), for the defendant. Before: FITZGERALD, P.J. an

613 A.2d 1281 (1992) Nancy A. Muller MILLIGAN v. William M. MILLIGAN. No. 89-589. Supreme Court of Vermont. May 15, 1992. *1282 William M. McCarty and Benjamin S. McCarty of McCarty Law Offices, Brattleboro, for plaintiff-appellee. Bruce M. Lawlor of Lawlor & Polidor, P.C., Springfield, for defendant-appellant.

WELCH, J. laThis matter is before us again on appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor 'of the defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), which dismissed the plaintiffs’" uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) claims against State Farm. For reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment bf the trial court and remand for further proceedings. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

956 So.2d 1066 (2007) Timothy MILLIGAN, Individually and as an Heir of the Estate of Jackie R. Milligan, Appellant, v. Mary V. MILLIGAN, Individually and as Trustee of the Jackie R. Milligan Testamentary Trust and Milligan's Ready Mix, Inc. and Kelly Kirk Milligan, Appellees. No. 2005-CA-01413-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. May 15, 2007.

— Decree affirmed, with costs against appellants. Opinion by Boardman, J.

AMENDED OPINION 1 DAVIS, Presiding Judge: T1 Anthony David Milligan appeals his convictions for murder, a first-degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-208(8) (Supp. 2011), 2 and attempted murder, a second-degree felony, see id. § 76-4-101 (

CLARK, Chief Judge. In this declaratory judgment action, Joyce Wilson, as personal representative of the Estate of Floy J. Stanley, sought a determination of the validity of three promissory notes and the deeds of trust purportedly given to secure payment of the notes, all of which were executed by L. Grant Milligan. After a bench trial, the court ruled the notes to be enforceable obligations owed by Milligan and the deeds of trust

265 P.3d 132 (2011) 2011 UT App 390 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Anthony David MILLIGAN, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20090999-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. November 10, 2011. *133 Ronald Fujino, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and Karen A. Klucznik, Salt Lake City, for

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND CONSOLIDATED CASES No. 2565 September Term, 2012 JOSEPH CHRISTIAN v. STATE OF MARYLAND No. 1986 September Term, 2012 JAMES MILLIGAN v. STATE OF MARYLAND Hotten, Berger, Arthur, JJ. Opinion by Arthur, J. Filed: October 3, 2014 Appellants Josep

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Ronda DePriest filed two consolidated lawsuits against Dennis Milligan, alleging various gender discrimination and retaliation claims. The district court 1 granted Milligan’s motion for summary judgment as to DePriest’s discrimination and retaliation claims and dismissed without prejudic

703 S.E.2d 1 (2010) MILLIGAN v. The STATE. No. A10A1343. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 10, 2010. Reconsideration Denied November 23, 2010. *2 Billy L. Spruell, Marietta, for appellant. Lee Darragh, Dist. Atty., Alison W. Toller, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-1365 ___________________________ Ronda DePriest lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dennis Milligan, individually and in his official capacity

PER CURIAM. Jurisdiction of this cause was temporarily relinquished to the lower court to clarify an apparent scrivener’s error appearing in the record transcription of jury instructions given below. This matter has now been clarified by affidavit of the official court reporter, and the judgment below is AFFIRMED. McCORD, BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

166 Cal.App.4th 1208 (2008) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIMOTHY ALLEN MILLIGAN, Defendant and Appellant. No. G039546. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. September 15, 2008. *1214 Jackie Menaster, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brow

145 P.3d 180 (2006) 208 Or. App. 229 Meghan Christine HABRAT, Respondent, v. Donald Ray MILLIGAN, Appellant. 18-05-08866; A128520. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 10, 2006. Decided September 27, 2006. *181 Jeffrey E. Potter argued the cause for appellant. With him on

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Oct 13 2016, 5:52 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of A