Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miller v. Snowflake, Inc.”
Martin v. Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Martin v. Giant Eagle, Inc., 2014-Ohio-2657.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Donald Martin, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 13AP-809 v. : (C.P.C. No. 11CVC-14861) Giant Eagle, Inc.,
ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on the 6th of October 2016, the Court held a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared by and through counsel. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [# 312], Plaintiffs Response [# 325] in opposition, and Defendants’ Reply [# 339] in support, as well as Defendants’ Letter Brief [# 346] and Plaintiffs L
JL Beverage Co. v. Beam, Inc.public domain
ORDER (Plf.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction — dkt. no. 36) MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. I. SUMMARY In this trademark infringement case, Plaintiff JL Beverage Company, LLC (“JL Beverage”) asks the Court to determine that Defendants infringe upon JL Beverage’s trademarked “lips images,” which are displayed prominently on its bottles of flavored and unflavor
Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Damages (“Def.Mot.”), filed April 16, 2004. Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Damages (“Pl.Opp.”) on June 9,2004. On July 27,2004, defendant filed a Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgmen
Day v. NLO, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION SPIEGEL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (doc. 267). The defendants opposed the motion (doc. 271), and the plaintiffs replied (doc. 276). The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on June 12, 1992. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion for class c
Bernsen v. Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc.public domain
Thompson, J. The trial court awarded a judgment of $49,085.50 principal plus $607.44 costs to Michael J. Bemsen for damages sustained when Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Big Bend) conditioned delivery of electrical service on payment of accounts for which he was not liable. Michael Bemsen appeals his damage award, contending the trial court erred in reducing damages for failure to mitigate. Big Bend cross
ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Puget Sound Freight Linespublic domain
44 Wn. App. 368 (1986) 722 P.2d 1310 ITT RAYONIER, INC., Respondent, v. PUGET SOUND FREIGHT LINES, ET AL, Appellants, FACTORY MUTUAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, Respondent. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. PUGET SOUND FREIGHT LINES, ET AL, Appellants, FACTORY MUTUAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, ET AL, Respondents. Nos. 7204-1-II; 7240-8-II. The Court of Appeals of
236 F.2d 527 Steve KOZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, andAllied Maintenance Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, andAllied Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Appellant. No. 330. Docket 23982. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued May 9, 1956.
OPINION JOHNSEN, Chief Judge. ¶ 1 Centennial Development Group, LLC sued Lawyer’s Title Insurance Corporation after the latter’s title commitment failed to disclose an easement. We affirm the superi- or court’s holding on summary judgment that Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 20-1562 (West 2013) bars Centennial’s claim for negligence.1 We reverse the dismissal of Cen
Lewis v. Debord and Nelson-Debordpublic domain
OPINION VÁSQUEZ, Judge. ¶ 1 In this appeal, Cecelia and Randall Lewis challenge the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of appellees Ray Debord and Anne Nelson-Debord in the Lewises’ action to foreclose a judgment lien against *59 the Debords’ property.
Legacy v. Citizens Cleanpublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE LEGACY FOUNDATION ACTION FUND, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 19-0773 FILED 1-20-2022 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County Nos. CV2018-004532 CV2018-006
Leigh v. Seekins Fordpublic domain
136 P.3d 214 (2006) Mark LEIGH, Appellant, v. SEEKINS FORD and Liberty Northwest Insurance Company, Appellees. No. S-11270. Supreme Court of Alaska. May 12, 2006. *215 James M. Hackett, Law Office of James M. Hackett, Fairbanks, for Appellant. Constance E. Livsey, Holmes Weddle & Barcott, PC, Anchorage, for Appellees.<
Sherley v. Sebeliuspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) DR. JAMES L. SHERLEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civ. No. 1:09-cv-1575 (RCL) )
Sherley v. Sebeliuspublic domain
776 F.Supp.2d 1 (2011) Dr. James L. SHERLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 1:09-cv-1575 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 27, 2011. *3 Thomas G. Hungar, Ryan Jeffrey Watson, Thomas M. Johnson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Matthew S. Bowman, Steven Henry A
Irwin v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, INDIANApublic domain
693 F.Supp.2d 846 (2010) Kayla IRWIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG, INDIANA, et al., Defendants. No. 4:08-cv-188-RLY-WGH. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. March 2, 2010. *848 Harry D. Rankin, Sutton Rankin Law, PLC, Edgewood, KY, J. David Bender, Attorney at Law, Fort Thomas, KY, for Plaintif
L. W. v. Jonathan Skrmettipublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0221p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, │ Samantha Williams a
Sechler v. State College Area School Districtpublic domain
121 F.Supp.2d 439 (2000) Jarrod SECHLER and David Warren Saxe, Plaintiffs, v. STATE COLLEGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and Dr. Patricia Best, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the State College Area School District, Defendants. No. 4:CV-00-0508. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. November 17, 2000. Bryan J, Brown, Stephen M. Crampton, Brian Fahli
Clark v. Trus Joist MacMillianpublic domain
836 So.2d 454 (2002) Joe CLARK, et al v. TRUS JOIST MacMILLIAN, et al. Nos. 02-676, 02-512. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 27, 2002. *456 James P. Dore', Gayla M. Moncla, Alan J. Berteau Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, McCowan & Jarman, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, for Appellant, James P. Dore'. Thoma
Morgan v. Swansonpublic domain
REVISED SEPTEMBER 28, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-40373 September 27
Suiter v. Eppersonpublic domain
571 N.W.2d 92 (1997) 6 Neb. App. 83 Diana J. SUITER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Harry E. Wolstencroft, Decreased, Appellant, v. Donald J. EPPERSON, Sr., d/b/a Credit Car Center, and Anthony D. Routt, Appellees. No. A-96-379. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. October 14, 1997. *96 John Thomas, Oma