Cases

750 F.Supp.2d 354 (2010) Brandy SAMSON, Plaintiff v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. C.A. No. 09-cv-30089-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 8, 2010. *355 Adam P. Clermont, APC Law, Pittsfield, MA, Neil C. Darragh Freedman, DeRosa & Rondeau, LLP, North Adams, MA, for Plaintiff. Robert M. Mack,

Seabury, J. This is an action to recover one month’s rent. The answer pleaded an alleged constructive eviction and a counterclaim, although the facts upon which the claim of eviction are predicated are not set forth. The trial was several times adjourned until December 10, 1913. On that day judgment by default was entered against the defendant. The defendant moved to open his alleged default, and this motion was denied. From the

814 A.2d 1028 (2002) 175 N.J. 178 The NEW JERSEY DEMOCRATIC PARTY, INC.; The New Jersey Democratic State Committee, and the Hon. Bonnie Watson Coleman, in her official capacity as Chair of the New Jersey Democratic Party and of New Jersey Democratic State Committee; and John or Jane Doe, yet to be selected Democratic Party Candidate for the Office of United States Senator, State of New Jersey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hon

MEMORANDUM ** Timothy Charles Miller appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Nardi v. Stewart, 354 F.3d 1134, 1140 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. Miller contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling because he was incapacitated for two six-month periods f

548 F.3d 361 (2008) In re: In the Matter of the Complaint of OMEGA PROTEIN, INC., as Owner of Fishing Vessel GULF SHORE, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. Omega Protein, Inc., as Owner of Fishing Vessel GULF SHORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samson Contour Energy E & P LLC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-30725. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nove

2 So.3d 321 (2008) Donald E. BROWN, Personal Representative, etc., Appellant, v. Thomas W. MILLER, III, etc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 5D07-1288, 5D07-1356. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. October 17, 2008. Rehearing Denied February 9, 2009. *322 Stephen Mendelsohn of Greenberg Traurig, P.A.,

MEMORANDUM ** A jury convicted Kory Nielsen of homicide by abuse for the death of 23-month-old Kyle Thies.1 The Washington Supreme Court affirmed his sentence on direct review, and Nielsen exhausted his state post-conviction remedies. Nielsen filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the district court, arguing that his sentence was unconstitutional under App

NUMBER 13-12-00461-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG SAMSON LOYNACHAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 213th District Court of

TERRY L. MYERS, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE INTRODUCTION *109In this adversary proceeding, Western Capital Partners LLC ("WCP") as third-party plaintiff filed suit against third-party defendants Michael Sandoval ("Sandoval"); xPatterns, LLC, a Washington limited liability company ("xPatterns"); and Opspring LLC ("O

NUMBER 13-17-00046-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARSHA ELLISON D/B/A ELLISON LEASE OPERATING, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. THREE RIVERS ACQUISITION LLC; THREE RIVERS OPERATING CO. LLC; CONCHO RESOURCES, INC.; COG OPERATING, LLC, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, SAMSON RESOURCES CO.; SAMSON LONE STAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Stephen P. Troy, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment in a civil action under 35 U.S.C. § 146 and challenges the court’s conclusion that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) properly cancelled the claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,216,451 (’451 patent) in an interference proceeding with Samson Manufacturing Corp. (Samson). Because the

NUMBER 13-17-00046-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARSHA ELLISON D/B/A ELLISON LEASE OPERATING, Appellant, v. SAMSON RESOURCES CO.; SAMSON LONE STAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; SAMSON LONE STAR LLC; SAMSON EXPLORATION, LLC; THREE RIVERS ACQUISITION LLC; THREE RIVERS OPERATING CO. LLC; CONCHO RESOURCES, INC.; COG OPERATING, LLC, S/D

MEMORANDUM * The district court granted Petitioner Ernest Allen Bailey’s petition for habeas corpus on the grounds that his state court conviction for first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder violated Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), and Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Respondent Magg

MEMORANDUM & ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Stephen P. Troy, Jr. (“Troy”), brings this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 146 (“Section 146”), seeking judicial review of a final decision and order (the “Decision”) of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the “Board”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) in P

MEMORANDUM ** Michael Williamson appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Williamson challenges his conviction on the ground that the trial court’s admission of Kathryn Wagner’s hearsay statements under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule violated his constitutional right to confrontation. He also argues that the district court erred in dismissing his pet

MEMORANDUM ** Washington state prisoner Ronald G. Beagles appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, challenging his 1998 conviction for second degree assault. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we vacate and remand. After the district court determined that the instant § 2254 petition was a mixed petition,

ORDER WILLIAM TERRELL HODGES, District Judge. Plaintiff Richard Samson has filed claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”) and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.01, et seq. (“FCRA”) against Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“Fed Ex”), alleging that Fed Ex revoked an offer of employment upon discovery that Mr. Samson

742 P.2d 1114 (1987) SAMSON RESOURCES COMPANY, Appellant, v. The OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION and TXO Production Corp., Appellees. No. 62102. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. July 21, 1987. As Corrected October 1, 1987. Rehearing Denied September 29, 1987. Gregory L. Mahaffey, J. Jayne Jarnigan, Mahaffey & Gore, P.C., Oklahoma City

547 U.S. 843 (2006) SAMSON v. CALIFORNIA No. 04-9728. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 22, 2006. Decided June 19, 2006. *845 Robert A. Long argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Martin Kassman. Ronald E. Niver, Deputy Attorney General of California,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CLARK’S MOTION TO DISMISS SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge. Before the court at Docket 8 is defendant Brett Clark’s Motion to Dismiss. At Docket 14, plaintiff Samson Tug and Barge (“Samson”) opposes. At Docket 18, Mr. Clark replies. At Docket 28, Samson surreplies. Oral argument on the motion was held on March 8, 2012. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL B