Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miller v. Krahl”
Miller v. Board of Educationpublic domain
12 Kan. App. 2d 368 (1987) 744 P.2d 865 DORIS MILLER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 470, COWLEY COUNTY, KANSAS, Appellee. No. 60,273 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed October 22, 1987. David M. Schauner and Sally H. Rogers, of Topeka, for the appellant. Donald Hickman, of Hic
Miller v. Smileypublic domain
. PLEASANTS, Chief Justice. This suit was brought by appellant Miller for a mandamus to compel appellee Smiley, the superintendent of public schools for Harris county to approve a contract of employment made by the trustees of common school district No. 36 with .appellant as teacher of history in the Almeda High School in said *418district for tlie present term of sai
Miller v. Piercepublic domain
361 S.W.2d 623 (1962) Lillie V. MILLER et al., Appellants, v. Dorcas PIERCE et al., Appellees. No. 3744. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland. October 12, 1962. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1962. *624 T. C. Wilkinson, Brownwood, for appellants. Griffin, Griffin & Old, Woodruff & Woodruff, Brow
Sholer v. ERC MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCpublic domain
256 P.3d 38 (2011) 2011 OK 24 Cassidy Jane SHOLER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ERC MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, ERC Properties, Inc., and Edmond Housing Associates III, Limited Partnership d/b/a Crownridge Apartments, Defendants/Appellees. No. 108,024. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 5, 2011. Rehearing Denied June 30, 2011.
Bob Crozier v. Stanley Wintpublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Bob D. Crozier and Karen K. Crozier sued Stanley L. Wint to recover $82,653 on a promissory note. The district court granted summary judgment to Wint. The Croziers appeal, arguing the transaction was not secured, was not a consumer transaction, and was within a de minimis exception to Missouri’s no notice-no deficiency rule. Having jurisdiction under 28
BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC.public domain
OSCN Found Document:BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Re
Hansen v. Academy, Ltd.public domain
Opinion by ROBERT DICK BELL, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Kimberly Hansen and Larry Hansen, wife and husband, appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of Defendant/Appellee Academy, Ltd., L.P. d/b/a Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc., a Texas Partnership (Academy). We find the evidence in the record before the trial court raised a genuine issue of controverted fact as to whether the danger
McAlpine v. Zangara Dodge, Inc.public domain
183 P.3d 975 (2008) 2008-NMCA-064 Burt C. McALPINE, Plaintiff, v. ZANGARA DODGE, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mountain Shadow Motor Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Great American Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,766. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 26, 2008.
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Glasspublic domain
959 P.2d 586 (1998) 1998 OK 52 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. William A. GLASS, Appellee/Defendant, and Damon Patrick Glass, Chris Cowan Glass, Glenn E. Glass and Darla Glass Brown, Appellants/Defendants, and Bill Eisenhour Funeral Homes, Inc. and Forest Staggs d/b/a Arlington Memory Gardens, Defendants. No. 89022. Supreme Court
Comes v. Microsoft Corp.public domain
775 N.W.2d 302 (2009) Joe COMES, Riley Paint, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Skeffington's Formal Wear of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, and Patricia Anne Larsen, Appellees, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Appellant, and Pro-Sys Consultants, Ltd., Neil Godfrey, K.L. & K. (London) Ltd., Marian Staresinic, and Marc Lefrancois, Intervenors-Appellees. No. 07-2063. Supreme Court of
In Re Estate of Fuselierpublic domain
*2OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice MORRISS. The purported joint will of Charles Orise Fuselier and his wife, Dena Fuselier, was dated March 21, 2007, and was in Dena’s handwriting, except that it also bore three signatures: those of Dena, Charles, and Rebecca W. Miller, a notary public. The document names Kayla A. Fuselier— Dena’s natural d
BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC.public domain
OSCN Found Document:BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Re
Pincheira v. Allstate Insurancepublic domain
190 P.3d 322 (2008) 2008-NMSC-049 Jose PINCHEIRA and Olivia Pincheira, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. No. 30,490. Supreme Court of New Mexico. August 5, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 5, 2008. *324 Berardinelli Law Firm, David J. Berardinelli, S
Krahling v. Executive Life Insurancepublic domain
959 P.2d 562 (1998) 125 N.M. 228 1998-NMCA-071 Chris KRAHLING, Superintendent of Insurance, State of New Mexico, Plaintiff, v. EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A California corporation, and Does 1 Through 1,000, Defendants, and THE NEW MEXICO LIFE INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Honeywell, Inc., and Honeywel
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eaganpublic domain
734 N.W.2d 623 (2007) WENSMANN REALTY, INC., et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF EAGAN, Respondent. No. A05-1074. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 12, 2007. *626 William Christopher Penwell, Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant. George C. Hoff, Justin L. Templin, Hoff, Barry & Koz
Stephan, J. The Nebraska Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association (Association) appeals from an order of the district court for Lancaster County denying its motion for summary judgment and granting the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Unisys Corporation. The district court held that certain Unisys employees were entitled to coverage under the Nebraska Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association Act (Act),
Unisys v. NEBRASKA LIFE AND HEALTH INS.public domain
673 N.W.2d 15 (2004) 267 Neb. 158 UNISYS CORPORATION, appellee and cross-appellant v. NEBRASKA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, appellant and cross-appellee. No. S-02-1056. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 2, 2004. *18 Shawn D. Renner and Pamela Epp Olsen, of
Wilson v. Denverpublic domain
961 P.2d 153 (1998) 125 N.M. 308 1998-NMSC-016 Dr. John N. WILSON, Barbara Wilson, and Nat Wilson, Contestants/Counterclaim-Defendants/Appellees, v. Jeanne DENVER, Margaret Nes, Polly Fox, Sue Goldberg, and Tony Trujillo, Contestees/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs/Appellants. No. 23667. Supreme Court of New Mexico. May 29, 1998.
Ruyle v. Continental Oil Co.public domain
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. Continental Oil Co. (Conoco) appeals the district court’s refusal to hold plaintiffs’ action collaterally estopped by a prior decision of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. We conclude that the district court erred in failing to give the Corporation Commission order preclusive effect, and we therefore reverse. I. Robert and Elizabeth Ruyle, Harvey and Marjorie F
233 Kan. 865 (1983) 666 P.2d 680 OTTAWA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 290, Appellee. No. 54,558 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 15, 1983. David M. Schauner, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Joyce Fackler Hendrix, of Anderson, Byrd & Richeson