⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Miller v. Krahl”

Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987-10-22 · Published · cited 14× · 744 P.2d 865; 12 Kan. App. 2d 368; 1987 Kan. App. LEXIS 1284
12 Kan. App. 2d 368 (1987) 744 P.2d 865 DORIS MILLER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 470, COWLEY COUNTY, KANSAS, Appellee. No. 60,273 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed October 22, 1987. David M. Schauner and Sally H. Rogers, of Topeka, for the appellant. Donald Hickman, of Hic
Miller v. Smileypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933-10-31 · Published · cited 18× · 65 S.W.2d 417
. PLEASANTS, Chief Justice. This suit was brought by appellant Miller for a mandamus to compel appellee Smiley, the superintendent of public schools for Harris county to approve a contract of employment made by the trustees of common school district No. 36 with .appellant as teacher of history in the Almeda High School in said *418district for tlie present term of sai
Miller v. Piercepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962-10-12 · Published · cited 5× · 361 S.W.2d 623; 1962 Tex. App. LEXIS 1907
361 S.W.2d 623 (1962) Lillie V. MILLER et al., Appellants, v. Dorcas PIERCE et al., Appellees. No. 3744. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland. October 12, 1962. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1962. *624 T. C. Wilkinson, Brownwood, for appellants. Griffin, Griffin & Old, Woodruff & Woodruff, Brow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011-04-05 · Published · cited 15× · 2011 OK 24; 256 P.3d 38; 2011 Okla. LEXIS 27; 2011 WL 1262163
256 P.3d 38 (2011) 2011 OK 24 Cassidy Jane SHOLER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ERC MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, ERC Properties, Inc., and Edmond Housing Associates III, Limited Partnership d/b/a Crownridge Apartments, Defendants/Appellees. No. 108,024. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 5, 2011. Rehearing Denied June 30, 2011.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-12-02 · Published · cited 14× · 736 F.3d 1134; 82 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 178; 2013 WL 6223937; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23930
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Bob D. Crozier and Karen K. Crozier sued Stanley L. Wint to recover $82,653 on a promissory note. The district court granted summary judgment to Wint. The Croziers appeal, arguing the transaction was not secured, was not a consumer transaction, and was within a de minimis exception to Missouri’s no notice-no deficiency rule. Having jurisdiction under 28
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015-04-07 · Published · cited 28× · 2015 OK 19; 356 P.3d 617; 2015 Okla. LEXIS 27; 2015 WL 1541969
OSCN Found Document:BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Re
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006-02-10 · Published · cited 0× · 136 P.3d 725; 2006 OK CIV APP 63; 2006 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 33; 2006 WL 1642059
Opinion by ROBERT DICK BELL, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Kimberly Hansen and Larry Hansen, wife and husband, appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of Defendant/Appellee Academy, Ltd., L.P. d/b/a Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc., a Texas Partnership (Academy). We find the evidence in the record before the trial court raised a genuine issue of controverted fact as to whether the danger
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008-03-26 · Published · cited 7× · 183 P.3d 975; 144 N.M. 90; 2008 NMCA 064
183 P.3d 975 (2008) 2008-NMCA-064 Burt C. McALPINE, Plaintiff, v. ZANGARA DODGE, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mountain Shadow Motor Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Great American Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,766. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 26, 2008.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998-06-09 · Published · cited 55× · 1998 OK 52; 959 P.2d 586; 69 O.B.A.J. 2148; 1998 Okla. LEXIS 60; 1998 WL 304357
959 P.2d 586 (1998) 1998 OK 52 THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. William A. GLASS, Appellee/Defendant, and Damon Patrick Glass, Chris Cowan Glass, Glenn E. Glass and Darla Glass Brown, Appellants/Defendants, and Bill Eisenhour Funeral Homes, Inc. and Forest Staggs d/b/a Arlington Memory Gardens, Defendants. No. 89022. Supreme Court
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009-11-20 · Published · cited 21× · 775 N.W.2d 302; 2009 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 123; 2009 WL 3878141
775 N.W.2d 302 (2009) Joe COMES, Riley Paint, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Skeffington's Formal Wear of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, and Patricia Anne Larsen, Appellees, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, Appellant, and Pro-Sys Consultants, Ltd., Neil Godfrey, K.L. & K. (London) Ltd., Marian Staresinic, and Marc Lefrancois, Intervenors-Appellees. No. 07-2063. Supreme Court of
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2009-09-29 · Published · cited 2× · 346 S.W.3d 1; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7538; 2009 WL 3079643
*2OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice MORRISS. The purported joint will of Charles Orise Fuselier and his wife, Dena Fuselier, was dated March 21, 2007, and was in Dena’s handwriting, except that it also bore three signatures: those of Dena, Charles, and Rebecca W. Miller, a notary public. The document names Kayla A. Fuselier— Dena’s natural d
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015-04-07 · Published · cited 21× · 2015 OK 19
OSCN Found Document:BROOM v. WILSON PAVING & EXCAVATING, INC. OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Re
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008-08-05 · Published · cited 22× · 190 P.3d 322; 144 N.M. 601; 2008 NMSC 049
190 P.3d 322 (2008) 2008-NMSC-049 Jose PINCHEIRA and Olivia Pincheira, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent. No. 30,490. Supreme Court of New Mexico. August 5, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 5, 2008. *324 Berardinelli Law Firm, David J. Berardinelli, S
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998-04-21 · Published · cited 11× · 959 P.2d 562; 125 N.M. 228; 1998 NMCA 071
959 P.2d 562 (1998) 125 N.M. 228 1998-NMCA-071 Chris KRAHLING, Superintendent of Insurance, State of New Mexico, Plaintiff, v. EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A California corporation, and Does 1 Through 1,000, Defendants, and THE NEW MEXICO LIFE INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Honeywell, Inc., and Honeywel
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007-07-12 · Published · cited 23× · 734 N.W.2d 623; 2007 Minn. LEXIS 389; 2007 WL 2003396
734 N.W.2d 623 (2007) WENSMANN REALTY, INC., et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF EAGAN, Respondent. No. A05-1074. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 12, 2007. *626 William Christopher Penwell, Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant. George C. Hoff, Justin L. Templin, Hoff, Barry & Koz
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004-01-02 · Published · cited 0× · 267 Neb. 158; 673 N.W.2d 15; 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2697; 2004 Neb. LEXIS 2
Stephan, J. The Nebraska Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association (Association) appeals from an order of the district court for Lancaster County denying its motion for summary judgment and granting the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Unisys Corporation. The district court held that certain Unisys employees were entitled to coverage under the Nebraska Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association Act (Act),
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004-01-02 · Published · cited 22× · 673 N.W.2d 15; 267 Neb. 158; 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2697
673 N.W.2d 15 (2004) 267 Neb. 158 UNISYS CORPORATION, appellee and cross-appellant v. NEBRASKA LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, appellant and cross-appellee. No. S-02-1056. Supreme Court of Nebraska. January 2, 2004. *18 Shawn D. Renner and Pamela Epp Olsen, of
Wilson v. Denverpublic domain
New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998-05-29 · Published · cited 64× · 961 P.2d 153; 125 N.M. 308; 1998 NMSC 016
961 P.2d 153 (1998) 125 N.M. 308 1998-NMSC-016 Dr. John N. WILSON, Barbara Wilson, and Nat Wilson, Contestants/Counterclaim-Defendants/Appellees, v. Jeanne DENVER, Margaret Nes, Polly Fox, Sue Goldberg, and Tony Trujillo, Contestees/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs/Appellants. No. 23667. Supreme Court of New Mexico. May 29, 1998.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994-12-20 · Published · cited 0× · 44 F.3d 837; 1994 WL 707942
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. Continental Oil Co. (Conoco) appeals the district court’s refusal to hold plaintiffs’ action collaterally estopped by a prior decision of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. We conclude that the district court erred in failing to give the Corporation Commission order preclusive effect, and we therefore reverse. I. Robert and Elizabeth Ruyle, Harvey and Marjorie F
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983-07-15 · Published · cited 7× · 666 P.2d 680; 233 Kan. 865; 1983 Kan. LEXIS 349; 114 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3016
233 Kan. 865 (1983) 666 P.2d 680 OTTAWA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 290, Appellee. No. 54,558 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 15, 1983. David M. Schauner, of Topeka, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Joyce Fackler Hendrix, of Anderson, Byrd & Richeson