Cases

Branch, Judge. Following the loss of her job as a surgical technician at Floyd Medical Center, Mindy Howerton filed suit in Floyd County Superior Court against Harbin Clinic, LLC and one of its employees, Kenneth C. Sands, M.D. Howerton asserted claims against both defendants for tortious interference with her employment contract, assault and battery, and intentional infliction

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Judge. hln August 2010, Mark Stephen Hower-ton pled guilty to one count of computer child pornography and three counts of internet stalking of a child. After conducting a sentencing hearing, the trial court entered a judgment and commitment order in which it sentenced appellant to 120 months’ suspended sentence for the computer child-pornography charge, 240 months’ impriso

329 S.E.2d 874 (1985) STATE of West Virginia v. James Ronald HOWERTON. No. 16129 Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. April 18, 1985. *876 J.T. Meisel, George D. Beter, Huntington, for appellant. S. Clark Woodroe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for appellee. *875 MILLER, Jus

929 S.W.2d 202 (1996) Roger Leonard MILLER, Appellant, v. Mary Ann MILLER (now Morris), Appellee. No. 95-CA-0048-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. September 20, 1996. *203 S. Frank Smith, Jr., Bowling Green, for Appellant. B. Alan Simpson, Bowling Green, for appellee. Before COMBS, GARDNER and HOWERTON, JJ. <

MEMORANDUM ** To warrant habeas relief, Howerton must show that the state court’s decision was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). *168Howerton contends that the trial court erred by excluding a key witness’s prior i

715 N.E.2d 963 (1999) Stanley HOWERTON and Helen Howerton, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. RED RIBBON, INC., Super 8 Motels, Inc., and Sterling Plumbing Group f/k/a Sterling Faucet Co., Appellees-Defendants. No. 18A02-9806-CV-504. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 7, 1999. *965 William K. Deer, Esq., McTurnan & Deer, Indianapo

194 Ill. App.3d 477 (1990) 551 N.E.2d 707 GARY ZITZMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. KENNETH L. MILLER et al., Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants (Lynn Zitzmann, Plaintiff). No 5-88-0292. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. Opinion filed February 21, 1990. *478 Robert L. Dougla

SCHRODER, Judge: In this petition for review of a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), William Miller (Miller) contends that the Board erred in finding that he did not submit reports of two separate x-rays to support his claim for retraining incentive benefits (RIB) and further that the evidence compels a finding of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, entitling him to a RIB. We disagree and therefore affirm.

Defendant Azel Howerton was charged by information with the commission of a lewd and lascivious act on a child under the age of 14. (Pen. Code, § 288.) He pleaded not guilty and waived trial by jury. By stipulation, the People submitted their case on the transcript of testimony taken at the preliminary examination. Defendant testified in his own behalf. On January 10, 1952, the court adjudged defendant guilty of the crime charged in the information.

DUNN, Judge. This appeal is from the Jefferson Circuit Court Order which affirmed the Order of the Appeal Board of the Bureau for Social Insurance terminating appellant’s Aid to Families with Dependent Children benefits. There is no dispute about the facts of this case. Appellant, Sharon Miller, received benefits from the Bureau for Social Insurance under its program of Aid to Families with Dependent Childre

HOWERTON, Chief Judge. This is a case where Zimmerman, an employee of Rockwell International in Bowling Green, Kentucky, was injured when he started the engine of his forklift truck in a van filled with propane gas which had leaked from a defective tank supplied by Miller’s Bottled Gas. An explosion occurred, and Zimmerman was severely burned. He was paid his medical benefits and some lost wages through workers’ compensation

PER CURIAM. In 1954 appellant was convicted on two counts of violating the federal narcotics acts (21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 2553(a)) and was sentenced to concurrent terms of three to nine years. On July 21, 1960, after serving approximately six years of the sentence, the appellant was conditionally released; he had earned 864

HAYES, Chief Judge: In this workers’ compensation case, the employer challenges the Board’s apportionment of liability for appellee Miller’s disability from pneumoconiosis. Miller was constantly exposed to hazardous dust during 35 years of employment at General Refractories, where he received his last injurious exposure. Pursuant to KRS 342.-316(13)(a), the Board apportioned liability 60% to the employer and 40% to the Speci

COOPER, Judge. This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the appellees, defendants below, declaring the provisions of KRS 91.450 through 91.527 unconstitutional and invalid. On appeal, the single issue is whether the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in ruling that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the provisions of the statute in question were unconstitutional as a matter of law. CR 56.03. Rev

696 S.E.2d 824 (2010) William P. MILLER, as Receiver for Rose Furniture Company, Plaintiff, v. FIRST BANK and E.F. Merrell Company, L.L.C., Defendants. First Bank, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Robert L. Kester, William V. Kester, Jr. and Edgar F. Merrell, Third-Party Defendants. No. COA09-607. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 3, 2010.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SPELLMAN, District Judge. This cause came -before the Court on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on behalf of William Roa. The record before the Court indicates that Petitioner is a Nicaraguan who arrived at Miami International Airport aboard an Air Florida flight from Tegucigalpa, Honduras $n May 8, 1982. Prior to his arr

HOWERTON, Judge. Appellant, James Edward Miller (hereinafter referred to as Miller), was arrested on February 12,1976, on a warrant for wanton endangerment and harassment obtained on a complaint by the appellee, Larry Johnson (hereinafter referred to as Johnson). The charges were subsequently dismissed, and Miller brought this action, alleging false arrest or imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Miller

618 S.E.2d 838 (2005) Cynthia Gail MILLER and Guy Morris Miller, Plaintiffs, v. FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a "Piedmont Medical Specialists"; Piedmont Medical Specialists, P.L.L.C.; Novant Health, Inc.; and Novant Health Triad Region, L.L.C., Defendants. No. COA04-1179. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 20, 2005. Elliot Pishko Morgan, P.A., by Da

Hunter, J. This case concerns the construction of a will. The second paragraph of the last will and testament of the testator, Elmer J. Howerton, provides: “Second: In the event that my wife, Emma Godlove Howerton, survives me, I give, bequeath and devise to her an undivided one-half interest in and to all of the property of which I may die seized, whether real, personal or mixed, wheresoeve

Deemer, J. The facts stated most strongly for plaintiff, as they should be, because of the order directing the verdict, arc as follows: Prior to February 23, 1909, one Anna Molin was indebted to plaintiff on open account for a balance of $204.79. She was preparing to leave Des Moines, where she had resided while the goods for which she was indebted had been purchased, and, learning of that fact, plaintiff’s cr