Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miller v. Hood”
Miller v. Hoodpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Robert J. Miller appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. We review de novo, see Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. Miller contends the district court has jurisdiction to entertain a claim of actual innocence raised in his § 2241 petition pursuant to the savings clau
Miller v. Hoodpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 280 OPINION This is a medical malpractice case. Suit was instituted by John J. Miller ('Miller') sometime prior to February 1, 1971, against Dr. Charles H. Hood ('Dr. Hood'), Mauritz Memorial Jackson County Hospital ('Hospital'), Jackson County, Texas ('County') and James Childress ('Childress'
Julian Lee Green v. Christopher Hood, Chief Shawn Schwertfeger, Officer Mitchell, and Officer Millerpublic domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED JULIAN LEE GREEN, July 30, 2024 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Hoodpublic domain
Funke, J. **209 *884 Edward Hood appeals from his convictions for motor vehicle homicide, manslaughter, driving under the influence of alcohol causing serious bodily injury, and refusal to submit
Hood v. United Statespublic domain
Pro se plaintiff; 28 U.S.C. § 1500. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Pro se plaintiff, Julian Hood, has initiated several actions in various United States Dis *234 trict Courts related to Ms deceased mother’s waiver of her i
People v. Hoodpublic domain
JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH delivered the opinion of the court: In September 2008, defendant, Richard L. Hood, filed a pro se pleading entitled “habeas corpus petition.” Also in September 2008, the trial court dismissed defendant’s pleading after recharacterizing it as a postconviction petition. In this appeal, defendant all
Hood v. Cotterpublic domain
5 So.3d 819 (2008) Carl HOOD v. Mark M. COTTER, M.D. Nos. 2008-C-0215, 2008-C-0237. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 2, 2008. Rehearing Denied January 30, 2009. *820 Milling, Benson, Woodward, Normand Francis Pizza, New Orleans, for applicant in 2008-C-0215. Roedel, Parsons, Koch, Blanche, Balhoff &
Mississippi Ex Rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.public domain
Justice SOTOMAYOR delivered the opinion of the Court. *164 Under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA or Act), defendants in civil suits may remove "mass actions" from state to federal court. CAFA defines a "mass action" as "any civil action ... in which monetary relief claims of 10
Hood v. Statepublic domain
537 S.E.2d 788 (2000) 245 Ga. App. 391 HOOD v. The STATE. No. A00A0893. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 28, 2000. *789 Thomas J. Killeen, for appellant. Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, James D. Love, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. MILLER, Judge. Jamie Hood was tried b
State v. Hoodpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Hood, 2025-Ohio-422.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 9-24-08 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ORTAVIOUS L. HOOD, JR., OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Marion County Common Pleas Court
Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.public domain
ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs motion to remand. Docket No. 19. The defendants have responded in opposition, Docket No. 25, the plaintiff has replied, Docket No. 29, and the Court is ready to rule. The motion to remand will be granted.' Also pending is the defendants’ motion to strike portions of the plaintiffs reply brief. Docket No. 30. That m
Baker v. Millerpublic domain
MOORE, Chief Justice (dissenting). Larry Heath Miller was awarded attorney fees from Robert Baker and Sheila Baker and Kenneth Cooper and Barbara Cooper after the Bakers and the Coopers intervened in a dispute between Miller and his wife during divorce proceedings concerning custody of their child. The Bakers and the Coopers appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. After granting the Bakers’ and the Coo
Miller v. Abbott Laboratoriespublic domain
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Miller reported what she reasonably understood to be an offer of money in exchange for Curl-Step-ney’s implementing a protocol involving Abbott’s products. Had Curl-Stepney accepted the offer and implemented a protocol that promoted an Abbott nutritional product to Medicaid or Medicare patients resulting in claims for reimbursement, an FCA viola
Walgreen Co. v. Hoodpublic domain
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: Walgreen Company (“Walgreen”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction barring the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (“the Department”) from using tiered Medicaid pharmacy-reimbursement rates to calculate payments to pharmacies serving Louisiana Medicaid recipients. Because we find that Walgreen does not have
Florida Democratic Party v. Hoodpublic domain
342 F.Supp.2d 1073 (2004) The FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiff, v. Glenda E. HOOD, etc., et al., Defendants. No. 4:04CV395RH/WCS. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. October 21, 2004. *1074 Alan Harold Fein, Christopher L. Barnett, Stearns Weaver Miller Etc, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff. George
People v. Hoodpublic domain
2022 IL App (4th) 200260 FILED November 21, 2022 NO. 4-20-0260 Carla Bender 4th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT
Matthew Gillis v. John Millerpublic domain
CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which HOOD, D.J., joined. MOORE, J. (pp, 690-95), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Matthew Gillis and Fred Wal-raven, former correctional officers at the Bay County Jail in Bay City, Michigan, appeal from the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment on their First Amendment retalia
Hood v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cou
Evans v. Hoodpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDIA EVANS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-03346 (CJN) JOANN HOOD, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Andia Evans bought a townhouse from JoAnn Hood in 2014. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 12, 14, ECF No. 3. Hood provided seller financing for the purchase. Id. ¶
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Stephen M. Hood, Plaintiff Below, November 3, 2023 Petitioner. released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK