Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miller v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation”
Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. v. Huffmanpublic domain
705 S.E.2d 806 (2010) CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION, Petitioner Below, Appellee, v. Randy HUFFMAN, Cabinet Secretary, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Oil and Gas, Respondent Below, Appellant, v. Lawson Heirs, Inc., Intervenor Below, Appellee, Sierra Club, Inc.; Cordie O. Hudkins; West Virginia Highlands Conservancy; Friends of Blackwater; and West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Intervenors Be
Arthur and Virginia Thornsbury v. Cabot Oil & Gaspublic domain
LOUGHRY, Justice, concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part: I dissent from the majority’s decision in this ease insofar as it concludes that the parties had an agreement whereby Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation (“Cabot”) would be permitted to build a road only two hundred feet in length on the Thornsburys’ property in exchange for five hundred dollars and that to the extent the road exceeds that length,
Cabot Oil v. Speer, C.public domain
J-A16019-20 2020 PA Super 258 CABOT OIL AND GAS CORPORATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AND GASSEARCH DRILLING SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION Appellees v. CHARLES F. SPEER, SPEER LAW FIRM, P.C., EDWARD CIARIMBOLI, CLANCY BOYLAN AND FELLERMAN & CIARIMBOLI Appellants No. 1926 MDA 2019
Michael Gerber v. Cabot Oil & Gas, etc.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Michael Gerber, December 7, 2015 Plaintiff Below, Petitioner RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPE
Roth v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTIN C. CARLSON, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiffs in this action, Frederick J. Roth and Debra A. Roth (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), have sued Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation and GasSearch Drilling Services Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants’ oil and gas drilling operations i
Cabot Oil v. Speer, C.public domain
J-A16019-20 2020 PA Super 258 CABOT OIL AND GAS CORPORATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT AND GASSEARCH DRILLING SERVICES OF PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION Appellees v. CHARLES F. SPEER, SPEER LAW FIRM, P.C., EDWARD CIARIMBOLI, CLANCY BOYLAN AND FELLERMAN & CIARIMBOLI Appellants No. 1926 MDA 2019 Appeal
Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. v. Pocahontas Land Corp.public domain
376 S.E.2d 94 (1988) CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA, and Cranberry Pipeline Corporation v. POCAHONTAS LAND CORPORATION. No. 17707. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. November 4, 1988. John C. Palmer, IV, Timothy M. Miller, Robinson & McElwee, Charleston, for Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. of W.Va. and Cranberry Pipeline Corp. Thomas E
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION and FILED CRANBERRY PIPELINE CORPORATION, November 9, 2017 Defendants Below, Petitioners, released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
Alvra Adams Jr. v. Cabot Oil and Gas Corp.public domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Alvra Adams Jr., FILED Defendant Below, Petitioner November 24, 2014 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs) No. 13-1
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Spring 2025 Term FILED _____________________________ May 22, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 24-ICA-154 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Spring 2025 Term FILED _____________________________ May 22, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 24-ICA-154 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
ACCEPTED 03-14-00667-CV 3957344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Bosley v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. of West Virginiapublic domain
624 F.Supp. 1174 (1986) Walter E. BOSLEY and Bernice W. Bosley, Plaintiffs, v. CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 2:85-0164. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division. January 14, 1986. *1175 Marvin W. Masters, Masters & Taylor, Charleston, W.Va., for plaintiff
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOOREpublic domain
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORE2023 OK 90Case Number: 119810Decided: 09/19/2023OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM, LLC, Cite as: 2023 OK 90, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Plaintiff/Appell
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOOREpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORE Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOOREpublic domain
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORE2023 OK 90Case Number: 119810Decided: 09/19/2023As Corrected: October 3, 2023OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM, LLC, Cite as: 2023 OK 90, __ P.3d __ Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CLAY E. MOORE, an individual, or his Heirs, Executors, Administrators, Truste
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOOREpublic domain
OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM v. MOORE2023 OK 90Case Number: 119810Decided: 09/19/2023OIL VALLEY PETROLEUM, LLC, Cite as: 2023 OK 90, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CLAY E
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG. D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission embarked in the early 1980s on an ambitious program to restructure the natural gas industry along lines more competitive than it had traditionally followed. One of the major components of this program, the encouragement of natural gas pipelines to adopt an “open access” transp
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: [[Image here]] *149[[Image here]] I. Introduction In the Spring of 1985, as Mikhail Gorbachev was assuming the duties of General Secretary and inaugurating perestroika, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission launched its own restructuring of the natural g
MIKVA, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part: I join in most of the majority’s conclusions about this massive and historic order. Unfortunately, even in the many instances in which I share the majority’s judgments, I remain wary of endorsing the totality of its exposition and analysis, and therefore I concur in the results only. Certainly a cas