Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1751 YORAM KAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALMART INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from th

*1063OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In these six actions, Plaintiff Wysong Corporation, a pet food manufacturer, claims that six of its alleged competitors engage in deceptive marketing practices. Wysong contends that the Defendants place on their pet food packaging images of

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: *265In September 2017, the Court held a bench trial between two Alzheimer's charities-Counterclaim Plaintiff Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (hereafter, "Alzheimer's Association" or the "Association" or "Counterclaim Plaintiff") and Counterclaim Defendant Alzheimer's Foundation of America

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

335 S.W.3d 126 (2010) Barbara ROBINSON, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of John Robinson, Deceased, Petitioner, v. CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Respondent. No. 06-0714. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued February 7, 2008. Decided October 22, 2010. Rehearing Denied April

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2008 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Dissenting Opinion Filed Date August 18, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00665-CV UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellant V. PAMELA EVANS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF CLARK BRANDON DAVIS, AND DOMINIC JONES,

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

293 F.Supp.2d 734 (2003) WELLS FARGO & CO., et. al., Plaintiffs, v. WHENU.COM, INC., Defendant. No. 03-71906. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 19, 2003. *735 *736 Jason S. Conti, Honigman, Miller, Bingham Farms, MI, for plaintiffs. Leonard M.

OPINION MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: This is a suit for the refund of taxes in the amount of $94,702,599 paid by taxpayer following the disallowance of deductions by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for business losses arising out of the alleged abandonment of intangible assets in tax years 1972 through 1978. In the alternative taxpayer contends it is entitled to a capital loss if the court finds the d

NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

412 U.S. 94 (1973) COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE. No. 71-863. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 16, 1972. Decided May 29, 1973.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. *96 J. Roger Wollenberg arg

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Mailed: April 23, 2008 Bucher UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ In re Noon Hour Food Products, Inc. ________

123 F.3d 490 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1138,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,940Alice JANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.Kimberly B. ELLERTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 95-3128, 96-1361. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 15, 199

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: March 7, 2013 June 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Philip Gover,