Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0010p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ZILLOW, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appe

615 F.3d 412 (2010) PSKS, INC., Doing Business as Kay's Kloset .... Kay's Shoes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-40506. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 17, 2010. *414 Robert W. Coykendall, Ken M. Peterson, St. Trial Atty., Will B. Wohlford (argued),

340 B.R. 829 (2006) In the matter of CONNOLLY NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Debtor. Mark H. Shapiro, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Art Leather, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-57090. Adversary No. 03-5070. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. April 12, 2006. *830 Robert A. Weisberg, Birmingham, MI, for Debtor.<

Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. In Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U. S. 373 (1911), the Court established the rule that it is per se illegal under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U. S. C. § 1, for a manufacturer to agree with its distributor to set the minimum price the distributor can charge for the manufacturer’s goods. The question presente

Manish S. Shah, United States District Judge Deckers Outdoor Corp., the company that owns the popular UGG brand, filed this lawsuit against Australian Leather Pty. Ltd., and its owner, Adnan Oygur, asserting claims for trademark and design patent infringement, because Australian Leather sells boots called "ugg boots." Defendants filed counterclaims and affirmative defenses, asserting, among other things, that Deckers's trademarks co

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are several motions relating to the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and choice of venue. The defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 38) and an Alternative Motion to Strike Request for Injunctive Relief and Class Allegations (Docket No. 45), to which the plaintiffs filed a consolidated Respons

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND F. DENNIS SAYLOR IV, District Judge. This is an action based on the alleged failure of defendants to revise underwrit*67ing figures and adjust reserves for workers’ compensation insurance policies. Defendant American Home Assurance Compan

44 B.R. 457 (1984) In the Matter of CARLA LEATHER, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 84 B 10700. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. November 2, 1984. *458 *459 *460 Ryan & Silberberg, Washington Drucker, New York City, for movant by Philip E. Silberberg,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. (“MRIS”) filed suit against Defendants American Home Realty Network (“AHRN”) and AHRN CEO Jonathan Cardella on March 28, 2012, alleging copyright infringement, violations of the Lanham Act, and tortious conversion and unjust enrichment. Doc. No. 1. MRIS’s claims are based on AHR

781 F.Supp.2d 488 (2011) MILLER TRUCK LINES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-939-C. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. March 17, 2011. *490 Stockard R. Hickey, III, Gwin, Steinmetz & Baird, PLLC, Louisville, KY, for Plaintiff.

582 F.3d 309 (2009) State of CONNECTICUT, State of New York, People of the State of California ex rel. Attorney General Bill Lockyer, State of Iowa, State of New Jersey, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin, and City of New York, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC., American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southern Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Corporation

*426OPINION JOHNSON, Judge An officer of a corporation falsified company records to show that a customer’s debt to the corporation was approximately $250,000 less than what the customer actually owed. The corporation was unaware of the inaccuracy of its records when it entered into a settlement agreement with the customer that resolved the debt for le

943 A.2d 630 (2008) 178 Md. App. 648 Robert H. KEELER v. ACADEMY OF AMERICAN FRANCISCAN HISTORY, INC. No. 2433, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 4, 2008. *631 James A. Vidmar, Jr. (Jennifer D. Larkin, Linowes and Blocher, LLP, on brief), Bethesda, for appellant. Patrick

Beier, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority’s resolution of the nonconstitutional issues in this case. I also agree with the majority’s determination that the statutoiy cap on noneconomic damages does not violate the doctrine of separation of powers. I would, however, reverse and remand to the district court because K.S.A. 60-19a02, as applied to plaintiff Amy

536 F.Supp.2d 181 (2008) NORTH AMERICAN CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Gerry CARDINALE, Rob Gheewalla, Jack Daly, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., GS Capital Partners, III, L.P., GS Capital Partners, III Offshore, L.P. and Goldman Sachs & Co. Verwaltungs GmbH, Defendants. No. C.A. 06-492-S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. March 5,

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Order and prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Garner and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence in this matter. Having reconsidered the evidence, the Full Commission reverses the Deputy Commissioner's denial of benefits and enters the following Opinion

HOWARD, Chief Judge. On December 2, 2004, five structural steel contractors filed a complaint against a local union alleging antitrust law violations under the Sherman Act, labor law *49 violations under the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), and other violations under state law. Over the interve

608 N.W.2d 177 (2000) 259 Neb. 100 LACKAWANNA LEATHER COMPANY, appellee, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Nebraska, appellant. No. S-98-1121. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 31, 2000. *180 Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and L. Jay Bartel, Lincoln, for appellant. Samuel E. Clark, of Eric

110 F.Supp.2d 406 (2000) Henry RICHTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC., Defendant. No. Civ. PJM 99-2935. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 14, 2000. *407 *408 Leslie A. Nettleford, Benny L. Kass, Kass & Skalet, Washington, DC, Barbara R. Kueppers, Min

McDonald, j. It is said, in many contexts, that timing is everything. This case involves an important question of timing for an appellate lawyer—the time to appeal. A trial court’s decision may take many forms—for example, a jury verdict, an oral ruling from the bench, a written opinion, a simple order. If ther