Cases

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Felix Feldheim (“Plaintiff’) brings this putative class action against Financial Recovery Services, Inc. (“FRS” or “Defendant”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq. (See Am. Compl. (Dkt. No. 17).) Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss pursuant to F

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, PUBLISHED Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins, White and Frucci Argued at Richmond, Virginia MAZIE GREEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0144-22-3

MEMORANDUM DALZELL, District Judge. Defendants Complete Payment Recovery Services, Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services (collectively, “the defendants”) move to dismiss Sandra Zari-chnys first amended complaint and strike the putative class action claims she brings under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Telephone Consumer Pr

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE In this certified class action, the plaintiff class alleges that a dunning letter sent by defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC was false, misleading or confusing in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, putting before me the question whether the claim can be decided as a matter of law based on undisputed facts, without a trial. Neith

Martinotti, District Judge Before this Court are: (1) Plaintiffs Bracha Pollak ("Pollak") and David Beneli's ("Beneli," together with Pollak, "Plaintiffs") Motion for Summary Judgment *818(ECF No. 50) and Motion to Certify Class (ECF No. 51); and (2) Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC's ("PRA") Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No 52.

DECISION ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge. This is a motion for certification of four classes. The underlying claim is that the defendants’ check collection procedures violate federal and Maine statutes regulating debt collection and unfair trade practices. I held oral argument on the motion May 3, 2012. After performing the “rigorous analysis” that Wal-Mart Stores, In

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) JAAAT Technical Services, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 61792, 61793, 61794 ) 61795, 61796, 61797 ) 61798, 61799, 61800 ) Under Contract No. W912HN-10-D-0063

WINCHESTER, J., dissenting: ¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. It is important to point out what 23 O.S.2011, § 61.2 does not do: (1) it does not cap damages in cases of wrongful death; (2) it does not cap economic damages for lost wages; (3) it does not cap economic damages for medical expenses; and (4) it does not bar the first $350,000 of non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. With the passage of § 61.2, the Legislature dete

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge This matter is pending for consideration of cross-motions for summary judgment [Record Nos. 54; 56] filed by Plaintiff Dede Stratton and Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”), in addition to the plaintiffs motion to strike an exhibit relied upon by the defendant [Record No. 62], PRA argues that it is entitled to summ

OSCN Found Document:BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC. BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.2019 OK 28Case Number: 114301Decided: 04/23/2019THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2019 OK 28, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO RE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2023 Term FILED March 31, 2023 No. 21-0506 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants seek a determination that Plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (“Travelers”) owes them a duty to defend. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny the Motion. <

Opinion issued December 17, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00023-CV ——————————— ARROW FIELD SERVICES, LLC, Appellant V. LINDE ENGINEERING NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appel

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 53], filed by Plaintiff Stephen Manno. For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that class certification is appropriate. Introduction Plaintiff Stephen Manno brought this putative c

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge On September 16, 2013, Aaron Alexis, a civilian contractor working as a computer technician at Washington, D.C.’s Navy Yard, used a valid temporary access card to enter Building 197 of the facility and then opened fire on its occupants, killing and wounding several people. In the. wake of that tragedy, se

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cour

565 Argued and submitted November 20, 2018, affirmed on appeal and cross-appeal July 22, 2020 JH KELLY, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. QUALITY PLUS SERVICES, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant. QUALITY PLUS SERVICES, INC.,

11/21/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 2, 2022 Session FAMILY TRUST SERVICES LLC ET AL. v. GREEN WISE HOMES LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 15-0780-BC Anne C. Martin, Chancellor _

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2022 Term FILED April 26, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 20-0755 SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION AND ORDER Mark S. Davis, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUD'GE This matter is before the Court on a motion seeking attorney’s fees1 and costs, ECF No. 43, and a motion for leave to file supplemental authority, ECF No. 56, filed by Plaintiff David D. Denton (“Plaintiff’). Plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees and costs is filed pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.