Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Millennium Productions LLC”
611 F.Supp.2d 1147 (2009) ENERGY ACQUISITION CORP., a Colorado corporation; Michigan Exploration, Inc., a Michigan corporation; Michigan Production Company, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company; and Michigan Energy Company, a Michigan limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, v. MILLENNIUM ENERGY FUND, L.L.C., a Delaware limited partnership; Williams Power Company, Inc. f/k/a Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Com
Millennium Holdings LLC v. Glidden Co.public domain
Sweeny, J.P., and Andrias, J., dissent in part in a memorandum by Andrias, J., as follows: Appellant insurance companies claim that they are entitled to be subrogated (both equitably and contractually) to the right of their insured, plaintiff Millennium Holdings LLC (Millennium), to indemnification from defendant the Glidden Company, now known as Akzo Nobel Paints (ANP), for the amounts they expended on behalf of Millennium in ce
Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Health, LLCpublic domain
*802OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Defendant Millennium Health, LLC moved in limine for an order excluding any evidence of willful infringement on the basis that Ameritox cannot show by clear and convincing evidence that Millennium “acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid
Jed Emert v. Millennium Taxi Service, LLCpublic domain
05/29/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 15, 2019 Session JED EMERT v. MILLENNIUM TAXI SERVICE, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County No. V-16-558 Lawrence Howard Puckett, Judge ___________________________________
In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLCpublic domain
Re: D.I.: 312, 313, 325, 326, 327, 328, 330, 339, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 367 MEMORANDUM LAURIE SELBER SILVERSTEIN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the motion (the “Rule 2004 Motion” or “Motion”) 2 of Marc S. Kirschner, as trustee of two trusts created pursuant to the Debt*618
Opt-Out Lenders v. Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC (In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC)public domain
STARK, U.S. District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION1 On December 14, 2015, the Opt-Out *563Lenders (together "Voya"),2 appealed the order (B.D.I. 195)3 ("Confirmation Order"), entered by the Honorable Laurie Selber Silverstein, Ban
In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM: OPINION LAURIE SELBER SILVERSTEIN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE . Before the Court is the' Opt-Out Lenders’ motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2)(A)1 to certify this Court’s order 2 confirming the Debtors’ Prepackaged Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC [D.I. 182] (as amended, the “Pl
Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Health, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. This patent dispute presents a question of first impression with respect to the subject matter eligibility of a urine or other biological sample for drug screening and compliance protocols under 35 U.S.C. § 101, as well as related issues of enablement under § 112. The analysis is made more challenging by the state of flux in the treatment of competing g
Robert W Mauthe MD PC v. Millennium Health LLCpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-2265 ______ ROBERT W MAUTHE MD PC, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellant v. MILLENNIUM HEALTH LLC ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court f
Millennium Holdings, LLC v. The Glidden Companypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Abdus-Salaam, J. In this action, appellant insurance companies seek to be subrogated to the right of their insured, plaintiff Millennium Holdings LLC, to indemnification against respondents, the Glidden Company, now known as Akzo Nobel Paints LLC, following the insurance companies’ satisfaction of Millennium’s obligations pursuant to mo
Hawaii Petroleum, Inc. v. Millennium HI Carbonpublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 23-AUG-2024 08:03 AM Dkt. 66 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
New York v. Next Millennium Realty, LLCpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge Pending before the Court are, inter alia, (1) the motion of plaintiffs State of New York and Basil Seggos, as Acting Commissioner of the NYDEC (collectively, “the State”), pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for partial summary judgment on their claims against defendants Next Millennium Realty LLC (“Next Millennium”); 101 Frost S
Millennium Operations, Inc. v. SuperValu, Inc.public domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. The principal question on this appeal is whether the antitrust plaintiffs in this case are required to arbitrate their claims against the wholesale grocer defendants, SuperValu, Inc. and C&S Wholesaler Grocers, Inc. I conclude that the claims brought by Village Market against Super-Va
FISHER, Senior Judge. Millennium Real Estate Investment, LLC appeals the final determination of the Indiana Board of Tax Review upholding the assessments of its real property for the 2008 tax year. The Court affirms. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Millennium owns three parcels of land in Boswell, Indiana, consisting of approximately twenty-one and a half acres and containing an industria
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Before the Court is an appeal by Comcast Cable Communications LLC (“Comcast”). Comcast appeals an Order by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay granting in part and denying in part a Motion to Compel filed by Millennium TGA, Inc. (“Millennium”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court vacates the Orde
Smith v. Millennium Rail, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Danny Smith was a repairman/welder for Defendant Millennium *1189Rail, Inc. But Smith had “bad hands.” Or more specifically, he suffered from carpal tunnel syndrome, which made it impossible for him to perform his job duties. After taking leave to have surgery, Smith s
Lamb v. Millennium Challenge Corporationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This case is before the Court on plaintiff Jerry Lamb’s third motion for leave to amend his complaint, Dkt. 41; his motions for summary judgment on all three counts of his amended complaint, Dkts. 21, 22; his motion seeking court-appointed counsel, Dkt. 27; and his motion for entry o
Millennium Park Joint Venture, LLC v. Houlihanpublic domain
JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Garman and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Freeman dissented, with opinion. Justice Burke dissented, with opinion, joined by Justices Freeman and Karmeier. OPINIO
Bentley v. Millennium Healthcare Centers II, LLCpublic domain
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Appellants Baretta Bentley and Pernela Haynes (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of their former employer, Millennium Healthcare Centers II, LLC, doing business as CareOne at Dunroven, formerly known as Dunroven Healthcare Center (“Dunroven”). We will affirm. I. Because we write solely for the benefit of t
Millennium Marketing Group LLC v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HOYT, District Judge. I. Introduction Pending before the Court is the defendant United States of America’s (“United States”) motion for a protective order and the plaintiffs, Millennium Marketing Group, LLC and The Millennium Multiple Employer Welfare Benefit Plan’s (“Millennium”), cross motion to compel production. Having considered the motions, p