Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miles v. U.S. Department of Education”
N'jai v. U.S. Department of Educationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JACQUELYN BRENEA N’JAI, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-2712 (DLF) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jacquelyn N’Jai brings this action against the Department of Education (“the Departm
Goh v. U.S. Department of Statepublic domain
_________________________________________ ) SIARHEI FILAZAPOVICH et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-cv-00943 (APM) ) DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al., ) ) Defendants.
Martin v. U.S. Department of Education (In re Young)public domain
ORDER AND OPINION Ben Barry, United States Bankruptcy Judge The debtors, Gretchen and Martin Young, filed their chapter 7 case on April 28, 2015. They received a discharge on August 4, 2015. On September 4, 2015, the debtors filed this adversary proceeding against the United States Department of Education [DOE], seeking a determination that their student loans are discharged pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)
Michael Peck v. U.S. Department of Laborpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1154 MICHAEL S. PECK, Ph.D., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD; MARTY WALSH, U.S. Secretary of Labor, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order from the United States Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board. (2017
Michael Peck v. U.S. Department of Laborpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1154 MICHAEL S. PECK, Ph.D., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD; MARTY WALSH, U.S. Secretary of Labor, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order from the United States Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board. (2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-cv-00119 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.,
Myhre v. U.S. Department of Education (In re Myhre)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION ROBERT D. MARTIN, Bankruptcy Judge. The U.S. Department of Education (the “DOE”) resists the discharge of a student loan debt owed by a quadriplegic debtor. Bradley A. Myhre filed a Chapter 7 petition and scheduled a debt of $14,072 owed to the DOE, and later filed a complaint seeking its dischargeability. Unsurprisingly, repayment of this loan would impose an undue hardship on Mr. Myh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-119 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. BREAD FOR THE CITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPA
Bagwell v. U.S. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RYAN BAGWELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-0531 (CRC) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Ryan Bagwell, an alumnus of Pennsylvania State University, filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (“F
Nation v. U.S. Department of the Interiorpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NAVAJO NATION, No. 13-15710 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-08205- PGR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the OPINION USDOI; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; JONATHAN
Lamento v. U.S. Dept. of Education (In re Lamento)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION PAT E. MORGENSTERN-CLARREN, Chief Judge. The plaintiff-chapter 7 debtor Alethea Lamento brought this adversary proceeding seeking a determination that her student loan debt of about $72,000.00 is dis-chargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8) because repaying the loans would be an undue hardship. The two defendants, the United States of America, on behalf of the U.S: Department
DONALDSON, Judge. The Alabama Department of Revenue (“the Department”) appeals from a summary judgment of the Montgomery Circuit Court (“the trial court”) holding that U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc. (“USXL”), a Tennessee corporation, is subject to Alabama’s lease tax under § 40-12-222(a), Ala. Code 1975, and, therefore, is. exempt from being assessed Alabama’s sales and use tax on certain, purchases it made in Alabama from Bridgest
366 B.R. 908 (2007) In re Mark Allen JESPERSON, Debtor. Mark Allen Jesperson, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Department of Education; National Student Loan Program, Inc.; Account Control Technology, Inc.; United Student Aid Funds, Inc.; GC Services; General Revenue Corp.; Educational Resources Institute, Inc. (Teri); Arrow Financial Services LLC; Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corp.; OSI Education Services, Inc.; Diversified Collection Services, I
State of Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineerspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Plaintiffs, and WATER WORKS AND SANITARY SEWER BOARD OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Civil Action No. 15-696 (EGS) UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, and STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. ALABAMA POWER CO
Albee v. U.S. Department of Education (In Re Albee)public domain
338 B.R. 407 (2006) In re Robin Timothy ALBEE, Debtor. Robin Timothy Albee, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Department of Education, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-20819-7, Adversary No. 05-2042. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. February 13, 2006. *408 *409 Janice A. Harde
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MANDAN, HIDATSA AND ARIKARA NATION, Plaintiff, Case No. 18-cv-1462 (CRC) v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; RYAN ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Defendants, SLAWSON EXPLO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-1051 (EGS) v. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, et al., Defendants. PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-1111 (EGS) U.S. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, et al.,
State of Alaska, Department of Revenue v. North Pacific Fishing, Inc. and U.S. Fishing LLC.public domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT ) OF REVENUE, ) Supreme Court No. S-17642
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA!, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 12-2039 (BAH) v. Consolidated with: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
U.S. House of Representatives v. Mnuchinpublic domain
TREVOR N. McFADDEN, U.S.D.J. Few ideas are more central to the American political tradition than the doctrine of separation of powers. Our Founders emerged from the Revolution determined to establish a government incapable of repeating the tyranny from which the Thirteen Colonies escaped. They did so by splitting power across three branches of the federal government and by providing each the tools required to preserve control over i