Cases

[Cite as State v. Miles, 2018-Ohio-3317.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 5-18-06 v. JOHN T. MILES III, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Hancock County Common Pleas Court T

Beckwith, Associate Judge: This case raises the question whether a noncompete and noninterference clause in a religious minister’s employment, contract may be enforced -by a preliminary , injunction after the employment is terminated. Appellant- Rabbi Yehuda Steiner was hired by American Friends of Lubavitch (AFL), a nonprofit affiliated

568 F.Supp.2d 1084 (2008) Arlene STEINER, Plaintiff, v. HORIZON MOVING SYSTEMS, INC., and Horizon Moving System of Arizona, LLC, Defendants. No. EDCV 08-682-VAP. United States District Court, C.D. California. Motion filed on June 13, 2008. July 25, 2008. *1085 Bonnie L. Kramer, Law Offices Kramer and Kramer, Palm

15 P.3d 1205 (2000) 2000 MT 334 Mary LARSON-MURPHY, Plaintiff, Appellant, and Cross-Respondent, v. Edwin and Violet STEINER, Darin Steiner, and August Zancanella, Defendants, Respondents and Cross-Appellants. No. 98-441. Supreme Court of Montana. Heard July 13, 1999. Submitted September 28, 1999. Decided December 14, 200

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered April 3, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from *260as limited, by the brief, upon the prior grant of defendant Rudolf Steiner School’s motion for a directed verdict, dismissed the complaint against that defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The infant plaintiff was injured when, moments after ali

PER CURIAM. Appeal from District Court dismissed on motion of appellant.

328 So.2d 281 (1975) M. M. MILES v. BANK OF HEFLIN. SC 1315. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 18, 1975. Rehearing Denied March 5, 1976. *282 Rives, Peterson, Pettus, Conway & Burge, Birmingham, and James D. Pruett, Gadsden, Rutledge & Pruett, Birmingham, for appellant. Steiner, Crum & Baker,

606 N.W.2d 881 (2000) 2000 ND 31 Barbara STEINER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. No. 990155. Supreme Court of North Dakota. February 22, 2000. *882 Marnell W. Ringsak, Severin, Ringsak & Morrow, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. John David Sear,

835 F.Supp. 771 (1993) Gary STEINER and Rodney Shields, Plaintiffs, v. HERCULES INC., David S. Hollingsworth, Fred L. Buckner, Arden B. Engerbretsen, George MacKenzie, and Edward J. Sheehy, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-442-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 24, 1993. *772 *773

The questions for decision in the instant case are whether or not stockholders are entitled to examine all of the records of the Bank of Heflin when demand has been made as required, and whether or not the extraordinary writ of mandamus should issue in this case. We grant the writ. M. M. Miles wrote two letters, dated 12 and 19 August, 1974, to the Bank of Heflin, requesting an unlimited inspection of the books and records of the Bank. The second letter alleged one or more prop

257 Pa. Superior Ct. 457 (1978) 390 A.2d 1326 COMMONWEALTH ex rel. Pamela STEINER, Appellant, v. Robert N. STEINER. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 12, 1978. Decided July 12, 1978. *458 Alfred H. Lander, Clarion, with him Alex E. Echard, Greensburg, for appellant. Ralph L.S. Montana, Cl

VAN der VOORT, Judge: On March 31, 1978, Randall Steiner was operating a tractor-trailer combination in the City of Chester. A police officer noticed the rear tires were bulging and stopped the vehicle. The officer observed that the tractor bore no registration plates; the trailer did bear current registration.1 Subsequently it was determined that the tractor had been registered in Pennsylvania for

Smith, Judge. Mr. and Mrs. Steiner, the appellants, brought a wrongful death action against Melvin following a traffic accident in which the appellants’ son was fatally injured. This appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in the appellee’s favor contends that irrelevant evidence was admitted and that various portions of the charge were erroneous. We find no error and affirm. The accident occ

Opinion by Henderson, J., The only error assigned is the refusal of the court to enter judgment in favor of the defendant non obstante veredicto. We are to consider therefore whether in all the evidence, facts were presented on which the jury might find a verdict for the plaintiff. The evidence on *452both sides is to the effect that the accident occur

PER CURIAM. Herbert Steiner (“claimant”) appeals the judgment of the District Court rejecting the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation and upholding the Secretary’s determination that claimant has skills transferable to numerous sedentary jobs. We affirm. Claimant sought disability benefits pursuant to section 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423. The Secretary denied his application initia

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Various Arizona landowners appeal an order of the district court granting summa *689 ry judgment for defendants in a suit challenging the constitutionality of the Arizona Groundwater Management Act of 1980 (the Act), Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 45-401 to 45-637 (West Supp.1982). P

This is a medical-malpractice case involving multiple issues. Shannon McCoy (Shannon) was thirty-seven weeks pregnant and under the prenatal obstetrical care of Dr. Debra Gunn, an obstetrician and gynecologist (ob/gyn) associated with Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P.A. (OGA). Shannon presented herself to the hospital with severe abdominal pain, where doctors determined that she had suffered placental abruption and that

THE KLEIN LAW FIRM ALEXANDER B. KLEIN III 2000 THE LYRIC CENTRE MYRIAM K. LEGGE BOARD CERTIFIED 440 LOUISIANA STREET OF COUNSEL PERSONAL INJURY TRIAL LAW TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 SPECIALIZATION (713) 650-1111 ALSO LICENSED IN COLORADO

Reversed and Remanded, Suggestion of Remittitur, and Opinion filed December 22, 2015. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00112-CV DEBRA C. GUNN, MD, OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A., AND OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Appellants V. ANDRE MCCOY, AS PERMANENT GUARDIAN OF SHANNON MILES MCCOY, AN INC

ANDERSON, J. Under the statute as it existed in the Code of 1896, § 2071, this coui't has frequently held that when the homestead left by a decedent Avas all of. his real estate, and was less than his homestead exemption in area and value, the title vests absolutely in the widow and minor children, one or both, whether the same is set apart or not.—Faircloth v. Carroll, 137 Ala. 243, 34 South. 182; Dickinson