Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON APPEAL OF RULING BENNETT, District Judge. As a federal district court judge cogently observed more than a decade ago, “The Magistrate’s Scheduling Order is not a frivolous piece of paper, idly entered, which can be cavalierly disregarded by counsel without peril.” Gestetner Carp. v. Case Equip. Co., 108 F.R.D. 138, 141 (D.Me.1985). However, should defendants be pre

993 F.Supp. 1224 (1998) Ken SWANSON, Jeanne Swanson, and Arthur Kellogg, Plaintiffs, v. Mike VAN OTTERLOO, Individually and as Sheriff of Plymouth County, Plymouth County, a governmental entity, Tom Bice, Dick Moritz and Craig Bartolozzi, Defendants. No. C96-4053-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. January 31, 1998.

TROTT, Circuit Judge: The major issue presented by this case is whether the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460aa et seq., preclude the issuance of mill site patents, even though the patent applications for those sites were pending at the time of the enactment of the Act. We hold that the provisions of the Sawtooth National Recreation Area Act expressly preclude the issuance of a

3 F.3d 1348 Elmer H. SWANSON; Livingston Silver, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Bruce BABBITT, Secretary of the United States Department ofthe Interior; Mike Espy, Secretary of the UnitedStates Department of Agriculture,* Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36341. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

Appeal No. 6083 from Judgment dated September 18, 1987, W.W. Brown, Ruling Judge; Union County Circuit Court. Before HAWKINS, P.J., and PRATHER and ROBERTSON, JJ. Affirmed.

SWANSON v. STATE Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice, dissenting. [¶ 52] I respectfully dissent. I join in Justice Sandstrom’s dissent on the issue of good faith. But, because I believe the trial court erred in deciding whether the Swanson children provided a “valuable consideration” for the property, I would reverse and remand for further consideration of that issue. [¶ 53] On the issue of the good faith of the chi

722 P.2d 1155 (1986) STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kevin Joseph SWANSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 85-491. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs April 4, 1986. Decided July 25, 1986. *1156 Torger S. Oaas, Lewistown, for defendant and appellant. Mike Greely, Atty. Gen., Barbara C

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3618 ___________________________ Christian Action League of Minnesota; Ann Redding Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Mike Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, in his official capacity

Affirm; Opinion Filed December 28, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00456-CV RETURN LEE TO LEE PARK, WARREN JOHNSON, and KATHERINE GANN, Appellants V. MIKE RAWLINGS, SCOTT GRIGGS, ADAM MEDRANO, CASEY THOMAS II, DWAINE CARAWAY, RICKEY CALLAHAN, OMAR NARVAEZ, KEVIN FELDER, TENNELL ATK

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § IN RE § No. 08-23-00223-CV ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. § IN MANDAMUS

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS D&H UNITED FUELING SOLUTIONS, § No. 08-23-00266-CV INC., § Appeal from the Appellant, § 143rd Judicial District Court v.

269 Neb. 114 BODIE J. WEEDER, APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, AND MIKE SWANSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN EMPLOYEE OF CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, APPELLEES. No. S-03-1174. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed January 14, 2005. Dean J. Sitzmann and Nichole S. Bogen, of Wolfe, Snowden, Hurd, Luers & Ahl, L.L.P., for appellant. Lucy

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-12-00521-CV _________________ CALVIN BROWN, Appellant V. CB&I, INC., MIKE SOSSMAN, IRVING GATICA, & MIKE ANDERSON, Appellees _

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-21-00053-CV § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN RE: UPCURVE ENERGY § PART

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-20-00080-CR IN RE: § § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CARLOS MUNOZ,

730 N.E.2d 205 (2000) Terrance SWANSON, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 20A03-9910-CR-376 Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 13, 2000. Transfer Denied September 5, 2000. *207 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Lorraine L. Rodts, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, I

SWANSON, J. In this direct appeal from the final judgment terminating her parental rights, the mother, J.B., claims she was denied the effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings below. Because we conclude the mother cannot demonstrate on the face of the record that trial counsel was ineffective, we affirm. However, we certify two questions of great public importance r

447 F.3d 967 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and DaimlerChrysler-UAW Pension Agreement, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Mike COX, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, and Jay B. Rising, Treasurer of the State of Michigan, Defendants-Appellants. No. 05-1716. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 27, 2006. Decided and Filed: May

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § Texas Mutual Insurance Company, § No. 08-18-00147-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 143rd District Court Anita Dejaynes, Indivi