Cases

FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 11, 2022 No. 04-22-00644-CR EX PARTE Miguel A. ESPINOZA, From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

MEMORANDUM ** Miguel Espinoza-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) reinstating a 1999 expedited removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Our review of DHS’ reinstatement order is “limited to confirming the agency’s compliance with the reinstatement regulations.” Garci

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge, dissenting. While I agree with the majority that one must analyze Fourth Amendment cases on their facts, in my view the uncontested factual record before us on this appeal requires us to affirm the district court’s decision to suppress the evidence found in Miguel Espinoza’s apartment. I therefore respectfully dissent. The majority’s description of the facts under

PER CURIAM. Miguel Espinoza-Montes appeals his convictions and sentences for false imprisonment and attempted sexual battery with a deadly weapon or physical force. We affirm Mr. Espinoza-Montes’s convictions without discussion. However, we reverse his mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five years’ imprisonment on the attempted sexual battery conviction and remand for resentencing because the jury did not make a finding th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-3090 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MIGUEL A. ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 00 CR 73--Lynn Adelman, Judge. Argued JANUARY 25, 2001--Decided July 11, 2001 Before COFFEY, RIPPLE and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges. COFFEY, Circuit Judge. On March 27, 2000, law enforcement officers in Racine, Wisconsin, executed

Appellate Case: 24-9566 Document: 90-1 Date Filed: 01/27/2026 Page: 1 FILED PUBLISH United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS J

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50199 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 8:18-cr-00043- JVS-1 MIGUEL SEBASTIAN VALLE, AKA Miguel Sebastian Balle, AKA Miguel Valle Cruz, AKA Miguel

MANION, Circuit Judge. Miguel Lara-Unzueta, 1 a native and citizen of Mexico, was convicted of one count of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court sentenced him to' 78 months’ imprisonment. Lara appeals, arguing that the district judge erred by failing to disqualify himself fro

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Cesar EspinozaMora and Miguel Mejia appeal from judgments of conviction entered May 17, 2005 and October 7, 2005, respectively, in the Southern District of New York, following a guilty plea before the Hon. Denise L. Cote, Judge. Victor Rivera and Gabriel Rivera appeal from judgments of conviction entered on August 24, 2005 and November 28, 2005, respectively, in the Southern Dist

*69 BALMER, C. J. This case arises from a helicopter crash in a remote part of Peru, which resulted in the deaths of everyone on board. Plaintiffs brought wrongful death actions in Oregon against Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. (Evergreen), an Oregon corporation that provided the helicopter and the pilot. Ever

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*. PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Aejandro Espinoza challenges his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. After a jury trial, Mr. Espinoza was convicted and sentenced to 240 months imprisonment to be followed by five years supervised release. On appeal,

ARMSTRONG, R J. This case arises out of a helicopter crash in Peru that resulted in the death of everyone on board, including eight Peruvian passengers. Plaintiffs, the personal representatives of the estates of the passengers, brought wrongful death actions in Oregon against Evergreen Helicopters, Inc. (Evergreen), an Oregon corporation that was the lessor of the helicopter and employer of the pilot. The trial court granted Eve

ORDER Eleazar Espinoza pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal he maintains that the district court erred in finding him ineligible for a “safety valve” exception to the statutory minimum sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 8558(f); see also U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. We affirm. In November 2000 Espinoza was riding in a tractor

105 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Miguel Angelo ESPINOZA, Defendant. No. 00-CR-0073. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 13, 2000. *1016 Mario F. Gonzales, Assistant United States Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff. John A. Cabranes, Attorney at

116 Cal.Rptr.2d 700 (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 1287 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Henry Gonzales ESPINOZA, Defendant and Appellant. In re Henry Gonzales Espinoza, On Habeas Corpus. Nos. H021384, H022532. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. February 5, 2002. Review Denied May 15, 2002. *702

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge. Alex Barragan-Espinoza appeals his conviction and sentence following his plea of guilty for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court sentenced Barragan-Espinoza to 360 months’ imprisonment, followed by 5 years of supervised release. The court’s sentence incorporates enhancements unde

128 Cal.Rptr.2d 320 (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 598 BRONCO WINE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. Manuel R. ESPINOZA, as Interim Director, etc., et al., Respondents; Napa Valley Vintners Association, Interveners. No. C037254. Court of Appeal, Third District. December 18, 2002. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 16, 2003.

ACCEPTED 13-15-00261-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/22/2015 4:11:56 PM

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Miguel Espinoza, was arrested on a weapons charge. At his arraignment on that charge, he was represented by counsel. Subsequently, while Espinoza was still in custody, the police interrogated him concerning a murder. Espinoza, who was not represented by counsel at that interrogation, confessed to the murder. At his trial on the murder charge

635 F.3d 1277 (2011) Miguel Angel Sanchez OSORIO, Juan Evenor Tercero Prado, Victorino Rodriguez, Felix Pedro Hernandez Estrada, Lucio Hernandez Lainez, Mariano De Jesus Malta Navarro, Apolonio Mariano Mejia, Ambrosio Aristides Zavala, Isabel De Angeles Espinoza Araica, Natividad Gomez, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Occidental Chemical Corporation, a New York Corporation, Dole Food Company, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Defen