Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miguel Angel Lopez, Jr.”
Lopez v. Massanaripublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Miguel Angel Lopez, Jr., appeals from the District Court’s ruling upholding the determination of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that Lopez was not under a “disability,” as defined in the Social Security Act, at any time through June 30, 1995. Lopez was awarded benefits with an onset date of July 1, 1995, based on other claims filed while the instant claim was
United States v. Melvin Martinez-Lopezpublic domain
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BERZON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW We took this case en banc to revisit the divisibility of California drug statutes.1 This case involves Califo
United States v. Lopezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Felipe Miguel Lopez, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. He contends that the district court violated his right to due process by considering an adjudication of juvenile delinquency in denying him a “safety valve” reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S
United States v. Lopezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Felipe Miguel Lopez, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. He contends that the district court violated his right to due process by considering an adjudication of juvenile delinquency in denying him a “safety valve” reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S
United States v. Lopez-Rodriguezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Angel Lopez-Rodriguez rais*513es arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate cr
United States v. Lopez-Rodriguezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel Angel Lopez-Rodriguez rais*513es arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate cr
United States v. Miguel Escamilla, Jr.public domain
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Miguel Escamilla appeals his convictions for conspiring to possess and possessing with the intent to distribute marijuana and heroin. Pressing five issues, Escamilla argues that the district court erroneously failed to suppress incriminating evidence that government agents obtained from an allegedly unconstitutional stop and ultimate arrest.
Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-16-00508-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/26/2017 5:56 PM
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-07-00654-CV ESTATE OF JOSE ERNESTO TREVINO, Deceased; Guadalupe P. Trevino, Jose Jaime Trevino and Patsy Trevino, Appellants v. Billy C. MELTON, Daisy Melton, Maria Del Rosario P. Lopez and Miguel G. Lopez, Jr., Appellees
Miguel Orellana v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MIGUEL ANGEL ORELLANA, No. 19-70164 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A072-937-494 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. OPINION On Petition for Review of an Order of the Bo
Geraldine Nicholson v. Miguel Gutierrezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERALDINE NICHOLSON; JOSE No. 17-56648 FERNANDO HUERTA; J. H., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem, D.C. No. Jose Fernando Huerta; J. N. G., a 2:15-cv-07594- minor by and through his guardian DDP-RAO ad litem, Geraldine Nicholson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. CITY OF LOS A
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: In this case, we are asked to review the dismissal of an action seeking redress for injuries suffered in a deadly maritime accident off the coast of Mexico. However, at this time, we forego a ruling on the merits of the dismissal of this case for forum non conveniens. After plaintiffs filed this appeal, the district judge who presided over this case rec
Jose Euceda Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
OPINION CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge: Jose Miguel Euceda Hernandez, a citizen of Honduras, filed a motion to reopen removal proceedings with the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) after the Board dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Board dismissed his motion to reopen for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to its “place-of-filing” rule. Euc
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00291-CV Agueda Nevares ARELLANO and Blanca Rosa Nevarez Arellano, Appellants v. Miguel Angel ARRELLANO, Jr., Ismael Arellano, Rebeca Jasso, and Alice Arellano,
Lopez-Loarca v. Cosmepublic domain
MAY, C.J. The relation back doctrine and its application in a subrogation action form the basis for this appeal. The guardian of the *7injured party (plaintiff) appeals a final summary judgment that found the plaintiffs individual claim barred by the statute of limitations. The guardian argues the trial court erred in two respects: (1) granting the final summary judgment
327 B.R. 493 (2005) Angel P. SAN MIGUEL SANDOVAL, Debtor. Hector Devila Vicenty, on behalf of Hector Davila Torres, and Neriana Vicenty Cardona, Appellants, v. Angel F. San Miguel Sandoval, and Alejandro Oliveras Rivera, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellees. BAP No. PR 04-026, Bankruptcy No. 00-06747-ESL, Adversary No. 01-0074. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit.
United States v. Lopezpublic domain
385 F.3d 245 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carlos LOPEZ, Angel Tejeda, also known as Gargola, Miguel Tejeda, also known as Kilepi, Linden Earl Rush, also known as Efro LNU, also known as Lynden Earl Rush and Barry James, Defendants,Julio Ramirez, also known as Augusto, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-1412. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued
United States v. Miguel Rolon-Ramospublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1066 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Lopez v. Airlift International Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. We review by writ of certiorari to the Industrial Relations Commission its af-firmance of a Judge of Industrial Claims’ order disallowing a fee claim of an attorney formerly representing a workmen’s compensation claimant. From the order of the Industrial Relations Commission, it appears as follows: Claimant employee, Miguel Angel Lopez’s knee was injured in an industrial accident on August 16, 19
HPC US Fund 1, L.P. v. Woodpublic domain
AMENDED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISQUALIFY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES M. HOPKINS (DE 611) JAMES M. HOPKINS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before this Court upon the parties’ consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction (DE 423). The Court has before it the De Los Reyes Defendants’ Motion to Disqualify Magistrate Judge James M. Hopkins (DE 611), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposit