Cases

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D22-2956 LT Case No. 2020-CF-001187-A _____________________________ MIGUEL A. CRUZ PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Donna Goerner, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL V MARTHA ESTHER Certiorari CRUZ ROMÁN procedente del Tribunal de Primera Recurrente Instancia, Sala Superior de Arecibo v

Rel: December 19, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TER

684 F.Supp.2d 217 (2010) Miguel A. CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 08-1905(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 4, 2010. *218 Maria H. Sandoval, Maria H. Sandoval Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Hector Ramirez-Carbo, United States Attorneys Office, Distr

In a guardianship proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Stack, J.H.O.), dated June 18, 2013, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination in an order dated April 24, 2013, denying, without a hearing, his motion for the issuance of an order, inter alia, making special findings so

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 6, 2013 (People v Cruz, 111 AD3d 651 [2013]), affirming a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed March 21, 2011. Ordered that the application is denied. T

Per Curiam. [¶ 1] Miguel Ángel Rodriguez. De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal,- De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed March 21, 2011, on the grounds that the sentence is both illegal and excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not illegally sentence him as a second felony offender (see People v McEachern, 275 AD2d 330 [2000]). Fur

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed March 21, 2011, on the grounds that the sentence is both illegal and excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not illegally sentence him as a second felony offender (see People v McEachern, 275 AD2d 330 [2000]). Fur

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Joan S. Posner, J.), dated September 10, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, granted the mother’s petition for permission to relocate to Georgia with the child. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In an order entere

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Decertify filed by Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Dollar Tree”). ECF No. 188.1 Plaintiffs Robert Runnings, Miguel Cruz, and John Hansen (collecti

— McCarthy, J. Defendant waived indictment and, in satisfaction of a superior court information, pleaded guilty to criminal sexual act in the *1139first degree. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant to 18 years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals, arguing that his plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Domingo Cruz-Miguel has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Miguel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev

Negroni Cintron, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION El 2 de junio de 1995 Miguel A. Cruz Matos presentó el recurso que nos ocupa para que revoquemos una orden emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan, el 18 de abril de 1995 y notificada el 3 de mayo de 1995. Mediante este dictamen el foro recurrido se negó, en primer término, a concederle al peticionario un plan de p

*1074TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Comparece ante nos Royal Holiday (la recurrente) mediante recurso de revisión administrativa. Nos solicita que revoquemos la Resolución emitida por el Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor (el DACO) el 9 de octubre de 2009 y notificada el siguiente día 13. Por medio de dicho dictamen, el DACO decretó la resolución del contrato sobre un plan

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Bernstein, J.), rendered on or about May 21, 2007, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.</

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN GLEESON, District Judge: Miguel Moreno (“Miguel”) alleges that his ex-wife, Lucy Moreno (“Lucy”), forged his signature on withdrawal slips which she then used to withdraw money from their joint variable annuity account without his knowledge or authorization. In his third-party complaint, Miguel has sued MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (“MetLife”), the issuer o

794 F.Supp.2d 329 (2011) Ricardo Javier REY-CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. FORENSIC SCIENCE INSTITUTE (ICF), et al., Defendants. Civil No. 10-1739(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 16, 2011. *331 Julio E. Gil-De-Lamadrid, Gil-De-Lamadrid, PSC, Bayamon, PR, for Plaintiff. Angel E. Rotger-Sabat, Maymi, Rivera &

PD-0696-15 PD-0696-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS June 8, 2015 Transmitted 6/8/2015 11:32:20 AM Accepted 6/8/2015 4:51:51 PM

FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 11, 2022 No. 04-22-00644-CR EX PARTE Miguel A. ESPINOZA, From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas