Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States”
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 23-45 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Plaintiff and Consolidated Defendant-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Defendant, Consol. Court No. 15-00213 and PT ENTERPRISE, INC. ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Plaintiffs.
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24-15 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC. ET AL., Plaintiff and Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge UNITED STATES, Consol. Court No. 15-00213 Defendant, and PT ENTERPRISE INC. ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Defendant- Intervenor.
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 20-16 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC. ET AL., Plaintiff and Consolidated Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Defendant, Consol. Court No. 15-00213 and PT ENTERPRISE INC. ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors and Consolidated Defend
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Eaton, Judge: *1315 This case involves the final results of the seventh administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel nails from the People's Republic of China, covering the period of review August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015 ("POR"). Certain Steel Nails From t
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 18 - 56 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : Court No. 16-00244 UN
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION Goldberg, Senior Judge: This matter returns to the court following a remand of the final determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) in its anti-dumping investigation of certain steel nails from the Sultanate of Oman. On May 23, 2017, Commerce filed its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, ECF No. 9
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
AMENDED OPINION Kelly, Judge: This consolidated action comes before the court on motions for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. Rule 56.2 Mot. for J. Agency R. PI. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc., Feb. 26, 2016, ECF No. 28 (“Mid Continent Mot.”); PT Pis.’ Rule 56.2 Mot. J. Agency R., Feb. 26, 2016, ECF No. 30 (“PT Mot.”). Plaintiff Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. (“Mid
Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION Claire R. Kelly, Judge, Kelly, Judge: Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of - Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “Department”) remand determination in the antidumping duty (“ADD”) investigation of certain steel nails from Taiwan, filed pursuant to the court’s order in Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States, 41 CIT-, 219 F.Supp.3d 1326 (2
OMG, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Katzmann, Judge: The court returns again to the question of whether plaintiff OMG, Inc.'s ("OMG's") zinc anchor products are nails. Before the court now is the United States Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Dep't Commerce Aug. 27, 2018) (" Remand Results "), ECF No. 49, which the court ordered in
OMG, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Katzmann, Judge: A prominent psychologist once suggested that it must be tempting "if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail." ABRAHAM MASLOW, PSYCHOLOGY OF SCIENCE: A RECONNAISSANCE 15-16 (1966). Plaintiff OMG, Inc. ("OMG") believes that the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") made such an error, and challenges Commerce's determination that zinc an
Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1747 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee PT ENTERPRISE INC., PRO-TEAM COIL NAIL ENTERPRISE INC., UNICATCH INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., WTA INTERNTIONAL CO., LTD., ZON MON CO.,
Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 21-1747 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee PT ENTERPRISE INC., PRO-TEAM COIL NAIL ENTERPRISE INC., UNICATCH INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., WTA INTERNTIONAL CO., LTD., ZON MON CO.,
Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee v. OMAN FASTENERS, LLC, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1296 ______________________
Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee PT ENTERPRISE INC., PRO-TEAM COIL NAIL ENTERPRISE INC., UNICATCH INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., WTA INTERNTIONAL CO., LTD., ZON MON CO., LTD., HOR LIANG INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, PRESIDENT INDUSTRIAL INC., LIANG CHYUAN I
Daikin America, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 25-22 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Court No. 22-00122 DAIKIN AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and GUJARAT FLUOROCHEMICALS LIMITED, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: M. Miller Baker, Judge OPINION [The court sustains Commerce’s re
Marmen Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARMEN INC., MARMEN ÉNERGIE INC., and MARMEN ENERGY CO., Plaintiffs, and WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Consolidated Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Consol. Court No. 20-00169 UNITED STATES, Defendant, and WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, MARMEN INC., MARMEN ÉNERGIE
Resolute FP Canada Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 24- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE RESOLUTE FP CANADA INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 23-00095 Defendant, and COMMITTEE OVERSEEING ACTION FOR LUMBER INTERNATIONAL TRADE INVESTIGATIONS O
Primesource Building Products, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 22-2128 Document: 90 Page: 1 Filed: 08/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PRIMESOURCE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., CHENG CH INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., CHINA STAPLE ENTERPRISE CORP., DE FASTENERS INC., HOYI PLUS CO., LTD., LIANG CHYUAN INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., TRIM INTERNATIONAL INC., UJL INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., YU CHI HARDWARE CO., LTD., ZON MON CO., LTD., Plaintiffs-
Omg, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 19-2131 Document: 67 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ OMG, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2131
Your Standing Int'l, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Slip Op. 25-14 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE YOUR STANDING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 24-00055 Defendant, and MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION [Sustaining the Department of