Cases

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

July 1, 1937, the plaintiff and James R. Johnston, with whose status this proceeding is concerned, signed a contract which is quoted in the majority opinion. July 1, 1938, according to the express findings of the defendant Commission, that contract was "mutually cancelled." Upon the same day the parties effected a new agreement which they reduced to writing December 1, 1938. It, too, is quoted in the majority opinion. March 1, 1938, the Journal (plaintiff), pursuant to the privilege afforded

*153Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING MOTION TO ENFORCE SALE ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: Chrysler Group LLC (“New Chrysler”) seeks an order of this Court enforcing the Sale Order1 pursuant to which it purchased substantially all of the assets of Old C

SACK, Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND “When an appeal comes to us after a jury verdict, we view the facts of the case in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.” Kosmynka v. Polaris Indus., Inc., 462 F.3d 74, 77 (2d Cir.2006). We set forth the facts of this case in accordance with that requirement. Scott and Anita Matusick Plaintiff Scott Matusick

SACK, Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND “When an appeal comes to us after a jury verdict, we view the facts of the case in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.” Kosmynka v. Polaris Indus., Inc., 462 F.3d 74, 77 (2d Cir.2006). We set forth the facts of this case in accordance with that requirement. *57 Scott and Anit

21-2179; 21-2566 We The Patriots USA, Inc. v. Hochul; Dr. A. v. Hochul In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ______________ August Term, 2021 (Argued: October 27, 2021 Decided: November 4, 2021) Docket

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number:______________ 3 Filing Date: June 30, 2016 4 NO. S-1-SC-35426 5 NOE RODRIGUEZ, 6 Worker-Respondent, 7 v. 8 BRAND WEST DAIRY, Uninsured Employer, 9 Employer-Respondent, 10 and 11 NEW MEXICO UNINSURED EMPLOYERS’ FUND, 12 Insurer-Petitioner, 13 Consolidated With: 14 MARIA ANGELICA AGUIRRE, 15 Worker-Respondent, 16 v. 17 M.A. & SONS CHILI PRODUCTS, 18 Employer-Respondent

ORDER GRANTING DOMESTIC FARMWORKER PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK E. WALKER, District Judge. This matter came before this Court on the motion of the 29 domestic farmworker Plaintiffs for partial summary judgment. ECF No. 131.1 Plaintiffs seek summary judgment regarding five claims brought under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Pr

Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a complex employment-discrimination case implicating the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act and multiple common-law tort doctrines. It arises from a report that Gilberto Rincones, a refinery technician, failed an employment-related drug test. Rincones sued his employer, WHM Custom Services, Inc.; t

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 16:43:49 2016.08.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2016-NMSC-029 Filing Date: June 30, 2016 Docket No. S-1-SC-35426 NOE R

596 N.W.2d 208 (1999) 235 Mich. App. 118 John REMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RYAN'S FAMILY STEAK HOUSES, INC., a foreign corporation and Michael Jean, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 196542. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted June 1, 1998, at Lansing. Decided April 9, 1999, at 9:15 a.m. Rel

465 N.W.2d 792 (1991) Ronald L. KENNEDY, Claimant and Appellant, v. HUBBARD MILLING COMPANY Employer and Appellee and Northwestern National Insurance Company, Insurer and Appellee. No. 16923. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs September 19, 1990. Decided February 6, 1991. *793 Scott Sumner of

410 Mich. 231 (1981) 301 N.W.2d 285 SMITH v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION DOERR v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING DIVISION, HOUDAILLE INDUSTRIES, INC Docket Nos. 62991, 63372. (Calendar Nos. 4, 5). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued March 4, 1980. Decided February 3, 1981. *232 Roth

11‐1234 (L) Matusick v. Erie Cnty. Water Auth., et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2011 (Argued: May 4, 2012 Decided: January 6, 2014) Docket Nos. 11‐1234 (L), 11‐1618 (XAP) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SCOTT M. MA

11‐1234, 11‐1618 Matusick v. Erie Cnty. Water Auth., et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2011 (Argued: May 4, 2012 Decided: January 3, 2014 Amended: February 25, 2014 ) Docket Nos. 11‐1234, 11‐1618 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

382 F.Supp.2d 457 (2005) The NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and The United States of America, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 7677(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 24, 2005. As Amended March 2, 2005. *458

51 B.R. 496 (1985) In re The A.C. WILLIAMS COMPANY, Ravenna Industries, Inc., Miami Foundry Corporation, Debtors. RAVENNA INDUSTRIES, INC., M.F. Company, fka Miami Foundry Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, the Industrial Commission of Ohio, Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 581-409 to 581-411, Adv. Nos. 584-0169, 584-0170. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Coalition for Gov’t Procurement, et al. No. 01-2231 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0101P (6th Cir.) v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc., et al. File Name: 04a0101p.06 _________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. In 1981, Congress, as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA), Pub.L. No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 357 (1981), revised the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program by providing that “specified” AFDC beneficiaries who receive lump-sum income in excess of their monthly standard of need are ineligible for program assistance for a specific perio

*442 ECONOMUS, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GILMAN, J., joined. GIBBONS, J., concurred in the judgment only. OPINION ECONOMUS, District Judge. I. OVERVIEW This appeal draws the court into the longstanding conflic