⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency v. Garcia”

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007-02-02 · Published · cited 1× · 360 B.R. 599; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 224; 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 213
OPINION WHIPPLE, Bankruptcy Judge. The Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency (“the Agency”) appeals the bankruptcy court’s order finding that its claim against Debtor Albion Health Services, a nonprofit employer, for reimbursements to Michigan’s Unemployment Trust Fund is not entitled to priority status as an excise tax under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8)(E). For the reasons that follow, the bankruptcy court’s d
Michigan Supreme Court · 2023-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra
Michigan Supreme Court · 2023-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010-09-07 · Published · cited 13× · 935 N.E.2d 612; 404 Ill. App. 3d 304; 343 Ill. Dec. 604
935 N.E.2d 612 (2010) 520 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE ASSOCIATES, d/b/a The Congress Plaza Hotel and Convention Center, Plaintiff-Appellant v. The DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, an Administrative Agency in the State of Illinois; Brenda A. Russell, Director of Illinois Department of Employment Security; Local 1, Unite Here, f/n/a/ Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DIVISION September 7, 2010 No. 1-09-2095 520 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE ASSOCIATES, ) Appeal from the d/b/a The Congress Plaza Hotel and ) Circuit Court of Convention Center, ) Cook County. ) Plaintiff-Appellant ) ) v.
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005-12-22 · Published · cited 17× · 184 S.W.3d 528; 2005 Ky. LEXIS 392; 2005 WL 3500280
COOPER, Justice. The issue presented by this appeal is whether a commercial automobile liability insurance policy affords coverage for damages sought in a tort action brought against the insured employer for the wrongful death of its employee, where the action would have been barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Act but for the fact that the employer failed to procure a policy of worke
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-15-00312-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/19/2015 6:10:46 PM
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 24-1925 ________________ ANDREW R. PERRONG v. MATTHEW BRADFORD; CLEO COMMUNICATIONS Matthew Bradford, Appellant _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court
New York Court of Appeals · 2024-05-21 · Published · cited 2× · 42 N.Y.3d 213; 2024 NY Slip Op 02764
Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v Vullo (2024 NY Slip Op 02764) Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v Vullo 2024 NY Slip Op 02764 [42 NY3d 213] May 21, 2024 Wilson, Ch. J., J. Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-02-15 · Published · cited 19× · 2 F. Supp. 3d 333; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20713; 2014 WL 639423
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On March 19, 2013, the Plaintiff JTE Enterprises, Inc. (the “Plaintiff’), commenced this action against Andrew M. Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York; Thomas Di Napoli, in his capacity as Comptroller of the State of New York; Peter M. Rivera, as Commissioner of the State of New York Labor Department (the “Department of
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-05-14 · Published · cited 3× · 314 F. Supp. 3d 1142
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1146THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims, filed March 17, 2017 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held hearings on June 12, 2017 and January 19, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the federal enclave doctrine applies to st
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-08-26 · Published · cited 31× · 798 F.3d 1228; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15067; 624 Fed. Appx. 488; 2015 WL 5024026
OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Like many state, local, and territorial jurisdictions, Guam has struggled for years with chronic budget deficits. Guam settled on a unique solution to its financial problems: It refused to refund over-withheld income taxes, using the money to fund government spending. Confronted with meritorious and uncontested claims for t
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13366 CHAD MARSH vs. MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL RAILROAD LLC & another.1 Plymouth
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2016-06-30 · Published · cited 6× · 10 N.M. 241; 2016 NMSC 029
Nakamura, J. (dissenting). {54} Since 1917, when the Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (1917, as amended through 2015), was originally enacted, the Legislature has allowed employers of farm and ranch laborers to decide for themselves whether to participate in the workers’ compensation scheme. See NMSA 1978, § 52-l-6(A)-(B) (1990); Laws 1917, ch. 83 §
New York Court of Appeals · 2023-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 47 The People &c. ex rel. Danny Rivera, Appellant, v. Superintendent, Woodbourne Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents. Kerry Elgarten, for appellant. Frank Brady, fo
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2017-08-28 · Published · cited 11× · 2017 Md. LEXIS 604; 168 A.3d 824; 455 Md. 462
Getty, J. “The Government of the United States, ... though limited in its powers, is supreme; and its laws, when made in pursuance of the Constitution, form the supreme law of the land[.]” Chief Justice John Marshall, McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 406, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). <
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2025-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SENATE and SENATE MAJORITY LEADER, FOR PUBLICATION October 27, 2025 Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
Tanvir v. Lynchpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 6× · 128 F. Supp. 3d 756; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117661; 2015 WL 5164869
OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge: Plaintiffs Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel AI-gibhah, Naveed Shinwari, and Awais Sajjad bring this suit to remedy alleged violations of their constitutional and statutory rights. Each is either a lawful permanent resident or citizen of the United States, and each is Muslim. They claim that as part of the U.S. Government’s efforts to bolster its intelligen
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 588 F. Supp. 2d 736; 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1201; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12162; 2007 WL 5787392
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA CRONE, District Judge. Pending before the court is Plaintiff United States of America’s (“United States”) Motion for Entry of Judgment (# 10). The United States, pursuant to the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act (“FDCPA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 3001-3308, seeks to garnish Bessie M. Lindsay’s (“Lindsay”) retirement benefits in the custody, control, or possession of First Bank &am;