Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff SEIU Healthcare Michigan’s motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED. I. Facts A. The Michigan Q

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge When the finances of a Michigan municipality or public school system are in jeopardy, a state law allows for the temporary appointment of an emergency manager to right the ship. An emergency manager’s powers in pursuing this end are extensive and arguably displace all of those of the local governmental officials. Plaintiffs, voters in areas with emergency managers and local e

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [2] ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [2]. Because the Court recognizes the urgency of this matter and the complexity of the issues involved, the Court is issuing this Order to convey the Court’s ultimate decision on the motion. The Court, however, will also

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants are home childcare providers in Michigan seeking to file a class-action lawsuit for the return of union dues and agency fees that were collected allegedly in violation of their First Amendment rights. The district court denied certification of plaintiffs’ proposed class— all home childcare

Opinion and Order Denying NAACP’s Motion for Relief from Stay (Dkt. # 740) and Granting Phillips’ Motion for Relief from Stay (Dkt. # 1004) STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. This opinion addresses two motions for relief from the stay. The first motion (Dkt. # 740) relates to Detroit Branch NAACP v. Snyder, No.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION DENISE PAGE HOOD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter involves an equal protection and first amendment challenge to a recent amendment to the Public Employment Relations Act (“PERA”). Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 423.201-217. The Michigan Education Association (“MEA”) and its local affiliates Adrian Education Association,

28 A.3d 1059 (2011) PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. PRICE DAWE 2006 INSURANCE TRUST, by and through its trustee, CHRISTIANA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, et al., Defendant Appellees. No. 174, 2011. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: August 17, 2011. Decided: September 20, 2011. *1062 Richard

Opinion Regarding Eligibilitg STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. The Congress shall have Power To ... establish ... uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.... Article I, Section 8, United States Constitution No ... law impairing the obligation of contract shall be enacted. Article I, Section 10, Michigan

Memorandum Regarding: I. Certification Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) (2) (A) (i) II. Recommendation on Whether Direct Appeals Should Be Authorized and III. Parties’ Request to Recommend Expedited Consideration of Appeals STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Summary Under

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 16-2057 SEAN A. RAVIN, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued September 27, 2018

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE COMPLAINT, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS, AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. In December 2009, Defendant Chesterfield Development Co. (“Chesterfield”) defaulted on a commercial mortgage loan held by P

[J-1-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF : No. 159 MM 2017 PENNSYLVANIA, CARMEN FEBO SAN : MIGUEL, JAMES SOLOMON, JOHN : On the Recommended Findings of Fact GREINER, JOHN CAPOWSKI, : and Conclusions of Law of the GRETCHEN BRANDT, THOMAS : Co

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Morris, Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1519.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical o

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0003p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SHARI GUERTIN, individually and as next friend of her ┐ child, E.B., a minor; DIOGENES MUSE-CLEVELAND, │ Plaintiffs-Appellees, │

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3352 ___________________________ Telescope Media Group, a Minnesota corporation; Carl Larsen; Angel Larsen, the founders and owners of Telescope Media Group Plaintiffs - Appellants v.

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(2008) Michael W. HOUT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, Ohio, et al., Defendants. No. 1:04 CV 1127. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF MANSFIELD, ANGELO KLOUSIADIS AND F.L. FISHER, DEFENDANTS OHIO COUNCIL 8 AND LOCAL 3088 OF THE AMER

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0307p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DEFENDING EDUCATION, fka Parents Defending

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu