Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michelle T. Scheuer”
Laster v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.public domain
407 F.Supp.2d 1181 (2005) Jennifer L. LASTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 05 CV 1167 DMS(AJB). United States District Court, S.D. California. November 30, 2005. *1182 *1183 Matthew B. Butler, Nicholas and Butler, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs. Mich
Edwards v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER HEWITT, Chief Judge. Before the court are plaintiffs Complaint (Compl.), together with attachments to plaintiffs Complaint (plaintiffs Appendix or Pl.’s App.); defendant’s Motion of the United States to Dismiss the Complaint and Brief for the United States in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Mot.), together with the Appendix of the Unite
Battista v. Cannonpublic domain
934 F.Supp. 400 (1996) Michelle BATTISTA, f/k/a Michelle Brinson, Plaintiff, v. Lee CANNON, Sheriff of Pasco County, Florida, Defendant. No. 96-688-CIV-T-17(A). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 24, 1996. *401 *402 *403 Craig
Malott v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ALETA A. TRAUGER, United States District Judge The defendant, Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (“Marriott”), has- filed a Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 15), to which the plaintiffs, John Malott and Michelle Mal-ott, have filed a Response in Opposition (Docket No. 17), Marriott has filed a Reply (Docket No. 18), and the plaintiffs—with leave of court—have filed a Sur-Reply (Docket No. 29).
46 F.Supp.2d 1276 (1999) FLORIDA SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC., A Florida corporation, Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, v. COLUMBIA/HCA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, A Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counter-plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Receivable Dynamics Inc., A Florida corporation, Nevada Communications Corporation, A Delaware corporation, and Norman R. Dobiesz, Maureen Donovan Dobiesz, Stuart M. Lopata and Samuel A. Greco, as individuals, Third
HANANIYA v. City of Memphispublic domain
252 F.Supp.2d 607 (2003) Yolanda Michelle HANANIYA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, Defendant. No. 02-2793-D/BRE. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. March 24, 2003. *608 Yolanda Michelle Hananiya, Memphis, for Yolanda Michelle Hananiya, plaintiff. Mary Helen Beard, Ford & Harrison, LLP, Loui
Smoot v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.public domain
Kenneth J. Kowalski, Doron M. Kalir, Civil Litigation Clinic, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, 2121 Euclid Avenue, LB 138, Cleveland, Ohio 44115, ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT Mike DeWine, Ohio Attorney General, BY: Laurence R. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, 615 West Superior Avenue, 11th Floor, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, For Director, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
Cummings-Fowler v. Suffolk County Community Collegepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On August 19, 2009, Michelle Cummings-Fowler (“the Plaintiff’) commenced this law*295suit against her former employer, Suffolk County Community College (“SCCC”), and her former supervisors, James Canniff (“Canniff’) and SCCC Dean Richard Britton (“Britton”) (collectively “the Defendants”), all
534 F.Supp.2d 284 (2008) R.S., By and Through his parents and next friends Mr. & Mrs. S., et al., Plaintiffs, v. RIDGEFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. No. 3:06CV01783 (DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 15, 2008. *285 David C. Shaw, Law Offices of David C. Shaw, Bloomfield, CT, for Plain
Armano v. Martinpublic domain
AMENDED OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge This matter concerns claims by a township’s former solicitor regarding his allegedly improper termination. Presently before the Court are the motions of defendants to dismiss and for summary judgment. Plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment on two of his claims.1 *396For th
Freeman v. United Statespublic domain
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge The plaintiffs bring this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. (the “FTCA”) seeking compensatory damages and attorneys’ fees. The Complaint has two counts. The First Count is brought by Patrick Freeman and alleges negligence by Department of Veterans Affairs personnel acting on behalf of the United Sta
Ingram v. Gonzalespublic domain
501 F.Supp.2d 180 (2007) Walter Louis INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-1243(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 21, 2007. *181 Walter Louis Ingram, Baltimore, MD, Pro se. Michelle Nicole Johnson, United States Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for
Gagne v. MJ Props. Realty, LLCpublic domain
Gagne v MJ Props. Realty, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 05769) Gagne v MJ Props. Realty, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 05769 Decided on November 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
West v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Plaintiff Arthur West, an Olympia, Washington resident, uses marijuana for medical purposes but objects to the wider use and distribution of “recreational” marijuana authorized by his home state’s recently enacted Initiative 502 (“1-502”). To combat this initiative, West sued sev
Ferguson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Unionpublic domain
626 F.Supp.2d 55 (2009) Michelle FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 689, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1030 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 19, 2009. *57 Patricia Elizabeth Ricks, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Douglas Taylor, Gromfine & Taylor, P.C., Alex
Contractual dispute over trucking services in Afghanistan; motion to dismiss count of the complaint alleging breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This case arises from a contract dispute between Mansoor International Development Services, Inc. (“Mansoor” or “plaintiff’) and th
Alexander v. Kujokpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Through this lawsuit, Plaintiffs Kelly Alexander and Donald Porter (“Plaintiffs” unless otherwise noted) seek damages and injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”). The jurisdiction of this court is premised on federal question jurisdiction in accordance with 2
MidAmerican Energy Co. v. Start Enterprises, Inc.public domain
437 F.Supp.2d 969 (2006) MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. START ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a American Moving Services, Inc., Defendant. No. 4:06-CV-00220. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 11, 2006. *970 Gregory R. Brown, Michele M. Ramsey, Duncan Green Brown Langeness & Eckley PC, Des Moine
OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Logan’s Roadhouse, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After examining the briefs and record, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented, and oral argument would no
González-Vera v. Townleypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Defendant Michael Vernon Townley is in hiding. And for good reason. He was the star witness against several defendants in a 1979 criminal case concerning the assassination of Orlando Letelier, the former Chilean ambassador to the United States. See Compl. [ECF No