⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michelle T. Kaufman”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013-02-15 · Published · cited 93× · 709 F.3d 1062; 2013 WL 562879; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3323
PER CURIAM: Anesh Gupta appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Gupta’s Complaint alleges that three U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents violated his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights when they arrested and detained him in connection with the initiation of removal proceedings against h
California Supreme Court · 2017-12-21 · Published · cited 246× · 226 Cal. Rptr. 3d 336; 4 Cal. 5th 145; 407 P.3d 18
Cuéllar, J. *154 Under California law, a brand-name drug manufacturer has a duty to warn of known or reasonably knowable adverse effects arising from an individual's use of its drug. (See Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1973)
Moore v. Kaufmanpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2010-10-22 · Published · cited 29× · 189 Cal. App. 4th 604; 117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 196
189 Cal.App.4th 604 (2010) 117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 196 SHEILA G. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. BARRY B. KAUFMAN, Defendant and Respondent; FRANCES L. DIAZ, Movant and Appellant. FRANCES L. DIAZ, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; BARRY B. KAUFMAN, Real Party in Interest. Nos. B206679, B222125. Court of Appeals of California, Second District
State v. Kaufmanpublic domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011-06-22 · Published · cited 164× · 711 S.E.2d 607; 227 W. Va. 537; 2011 W. Va. LEXIS 56
711 S.E.2d 607 (2011) STATE of West Virginia, Plaintiff Below, Appellant v. David Wayne KAUFMAN, Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 35691. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted March 30, 2011. Decided June 22, 2011. *611 Darrell V. McGraw, Jr. Esq., Attorney General, Benjamin F. Yancey, III, Assistant
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014-03-14 · Published · cited 1× · 409 U.S. App. D.C. 1; 745 F.3d 521; 37 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1556; 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20057; 2014 WL 982871; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4805
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge SRINIVASAN. SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge. Hugh Kaufman, an employee of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), brought several claims against his employer for allegedly retaliating against him in violation of several environmental whistle-blowing provisions. An
Montana Supreme Court · 2012-06-05 · Published · cited 6× · 2012 MT 121; 365 Mont. 196; 279 P.3d 157; 2012 WL 1999861; 2012 Mont. LEXIS 168
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellants, Kaufman Brothers (Kaufmans), appeal from the order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, granting summary judgment to Defendants/Appellees Home Value Stores, Inc., et al. (Home Value) on Kaufmans’ claims under the p
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014-03-14 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 18, 2013 Decided March 14, 2014 No. 12-1036 HUGH B. KAUFMAN, PETITIONER v. THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of the Final Decision and Order of the United States Department of Labo
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2011-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00148-CV Matthew Lee, Appellant v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2011-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00148-CV Matthew Lee, Appellant v. Angela Lee Kaufman, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-09-003978, HONORABLE RHONDA HURLEY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024-08-15 · Published · cited 0×
MICHELLE LEININGER * NO. 2023-CA-0574 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL BRITTANIE HEANEY, THE * SHERWIN-WILLIAMS FOURTH CIRCUIT COMPANY, AND ACE * AMERICAN/CHUBB STATE OF LOUISIANA INSURANCE COMPANY ******* APPEAL FROM
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008-01-25 · Published · cited 11× · 658 S.E.2d 728; 222 W. Va. 37; 2008 W. Va. LEXIS 1
658 S.E.2d 728 (2008) STATE ex rel. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Stephen D. Clegg, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Tod KAUFMAN, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia; Donald E. Smith II and Sherri Smith, Respondents. No. 33652. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted: January 8, 2008. Decided January 25, 2008.
State ex rel. S.T.public domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-01-28 · Published · cited 1× · 158 So. 3d 944; 2014 La.App. 4 Cir. 0731; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 100; 2015 WL 392660
JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge. _[iThis is an appeal of the April 10, 2014 judgment of the Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, adjudicating the minor child, S.T.,1 as an emotionally abused child in need of care. S.T..’s mother, Y.L., and S.T.’s court-appointed counsel appeal the judgment, and argue that this Court should vacate the adjudication, render judgment adjudicating S.T. as a sexually abused chi
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995-02-07 · Published · cited 163× · 232 Conn. 122; 653 A.2d 798; 1995 Conn. LEXIS 23
Peters, C. J. This appeal concerns the effect of the affordable housing land use appeals act; General Stat*124utes § 8-SOg;1 on an application for a zone change. The defendant, the zoning commission of the city of Dan-bury (commission), denied the application of the plaintiff, Robert J. Kaufman, to amend the zoning map of
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-01-27 · Published · cited 1× · 24 F.4th 718
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1243 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Petitioner, Appellee, v. MICHELLE RICCO JONAS, Respondent, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Landya B. McCafferty, U.S. District Judge]
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2004-03-18 · Published · cited 14× · 150 S.W.3d 498; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2428; 2004 WL 524483
150 S.W.3d 498 (2004) Gary HENRY and Sheree Henry; Brenda Adams-Degraffenreid; Sean Adams and Meshanna Adams; Robert Allen; W. Marie Allen; Betty Andrews; Courtney Armstrong and Cheri Armstrong; Yaser Ayyoub and Sanna Ayyoub; Elizabeth Baker; Eric Bearden; et al., Appellants, v. KAUFMAN COUNTY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, Appellee. No. 03-03-00549-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1999-03-26 · Published · cited 6× · 233 B.R. 754; 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 317; 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 189; 1999 WL 179341
233 B.R. 754 (1999) In re BIG RIVERS ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 96-41168-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky, Louisville Division. March 26, 1999. *755 Michael A. Fiorella, Felicia S. Turner, Sullivan Mountjoy Stainbeck & Miller, Owensboro, KY, Mark S. Kaufman, Laura F. Nix, Russell A. Tolley, Long Ald
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 11× · 416 P.3d 277
NAKAMURA, Chief Justice. *280 {1} New Energy Economy, Inc. (NEE) appeals from a final order issued by the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC). NEE contends that the PRC violated New Mexico law by approving a contested stipulation granting the Public Service Company of New Mexico
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010-11-01 · Published · cited 18× · 438 B.R. 471; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 3737; 2010 WL 4313046
438 B.R. 471 (2010) In re CAPMARK FINANCIAL GROUP INC., et al., Debtors. No. 09-13684 (CSS). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. November 1, 2010. *474 Jason M. Madron, Lee E. Kaufman, Mark D. Collins, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, for Debtors. Craig E. Rubin, Michele L. Angell, Kasowitz, Benson, To
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 604 U.S. 20
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 1 Pages 20–21 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT December 11, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-07-26 · Published · cited 0× · 193 N.Y.S.3d 250; 218 A.D.3d 772; 2023 NY Slip Op 03918
Matter of Moor v Moor (2023 NY Slip Op 03918) Matter of Moor v Moor 2023 NY Slip Op 03918 Decided on July 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.