Cases

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII KARLA MICHELLE Apelación RIVERA LUCIANO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelada Instancia, Sala KLAN202500325 Superior de Mayagüez v. Caso Núm. LUIS GABRIEL SOTO

Opinion PREMO, J. Defendant Mario Lopez Soto pleaded nolo contendere to driving with a blood-alcohol content in excess of 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (b)) and driving with a suspended license (id., § 14601.2, subd. (a)). He was placed on five years’ felony probation. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s imposition of a probation condition re

Rosen, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur with the majority’s conclusions affirming Soto’s convictions. However, K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-3414(3) provides: “[Wjhere there is some evidence which would reasonably justify a conviction of some lesser included crime . . . the judge shall instruct the jury as to the crime charged and any such lesser included crime.” Here, even the party offering the instruction ag

ORDER Jesus Soto-Ozuna appeals the denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which retroactively lowered the base offense level for most drug crimes. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(d); id. supp. to app. C., amend. 782 (2014). The district court denied the motion, stating that Soto-Ozuna’s sentence was imposed based on a binding plea agreemen

659 N.W.2d 1 (2003) 11 Neb. App. 667 STATE of Nebraska, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Michelle SOTO et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants, and Toni Pounder et al., Appellees. No. A-02-288. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. April 1, 2003. *4 Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and Tom Stine for appellant.</

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge This case arises out of the tragic shooting of a mentally ill man and his mother by members of the New York City Police Department. Plaintiffs Edgar Soto, Jr., Flora Soto, and Edgar Soto, Sr. asserted excessive force and due process claims against the City of New York and Police Officers Brian Santiago, Angel Torres, and Augustin Melendez pursuant to

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Soto has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Soto has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record ref

MEMORANDUM * Gamaliel Plasencia Soto (Soto) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA’s) affirmance of an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) order of removal No. (05-70977) and its denial of his motion to reopen (05-73313). We have limited jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we dismiss in part and deny in part. 1. Soto argues that the BIA erred when it affirmed th

MEMORANDUM * Gamaliel Plasencia Soto (Soto) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA’s) affirmance of an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) order of removal No. (05-70977) and its denial of his motion to reopen (05-73313). We have limited jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we dismiss in part and deny in part. 1. Soto argues that the BIA erred when it affirmed th

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Wander Berroa-Soto (“Ber-roa”), a citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of a January 24, 2008, 2008 WL 486860, BIA decision, No. A 56-682-953, affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) dated October 3, 2007, finding Berroa removable. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented by this petition. Berro

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Wander Berroa-Soto (“Ber-roa”), a citizen of the Dominican Republic, petitions for review of a January 24, 2008, 2008 WL 486860, BIA decision, No. A 56-682-953, affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) dated October 3, 2007, finding Berroa removable. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case, and the issues presented by this petition. Berro

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Soto-Castillo appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Soto-Castillo contends the district court erred by sentencing him to more than the statutory maximum for a violation of § 1326, when he did not admit nor did a jury find a date of deportation nor any prior conv

OPINION OF THE COURT Patricia Nuñez, J. The defendant is charged with sexual abuse in the third *162degree, in violation of Penal Law § 130.55, and two counts of forcible touching, in violation of Penal Law § 130.52 (1) and (2). The defendant moves for an order dismissing the charge of forcible touching on the grounds of facial insufficiency and fo

MEMORANDUM** Federal prisoner Jorge Rodarte-Soto appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm. Rodarte-Soto contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3583, which authorizes the imposition of a term of supervised release, is unconstitutional as applied under Apprendi v. New Jersey

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This massive drug conspiracy case from Puerto Rico involved a six-month trial and resulted in convictions of the eleven defendants who appeal, eight of whom received life sentences and three of whom received sentences of more than twenty years. The government charged this case as involving one overarching conspiracy from January 1990 t

383 F.3d 228 Rutilio LOPEZ-SOTO, Petitioner,v.John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 03-1331. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: September 20, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: James M. Sullivan, Appellate Litigation Program, Georgetown Universi

2022 UT App 107 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. XAVIER SOTO, Appellant. Opinion No. 20200272-CA Filed September 1, 2022 Second District Court, Ogden Department The Honorable Joseph M. Bean

Opinión concurrente del Juez Asociado Señor Negrón García. I Es nula la compraventa millonaria entre los Sres. Rafael Soto Vázquez y José Rivera Alvarado de bienes mue-bles e inmuebles gananciales, sin el consentimiento de la Sra. Inocencia Alvarado Peñalvert, esposa de Rivera Alvarado. Art. 1313 del Código Civil, 31 L.RR.A. see. 3673.(1) Rec

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § THE STATE OF TEXAS, No. 08-24-00270-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHELLE JEANETTE BARRIENTES, § No. 08-23-00113-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 226th Judicial District Court THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Bexar County,