Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00198-CV ___________________________ MICHELLE L. BROWN AND CORBY R. BROWN, Appellants V. DR. WAYMON E. LEWIS, JR., DPM AND WEATHERFORD PODIATRY, Appellees On Appeal from the 43rd District Co

OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN D. BARRETT, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Branch Banking & Trust Company’s (“BB & T” ’s) motion to dismiss the complaint filed by Michele R. Brown (“Debtor”). This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 and jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334. For the following reasons, BB & T’s motion to dismiss is granted.

*114 ORDER GRANTING LEGACY BANK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge. These are cross-motions for summary-judgment filed by the trustee, Carl B. Davis, and the defendant Legacy Bank on the Trustee’s complaint to avoid the Bank’s security interest in Michelle Brown’

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOLLOWING TRIAL Kay Woods-, United States Bankruptcy Judge■ This Memorandum Opinion provides the Court’s decision following trial on the Complaint for Determination of Validity, Extent and Priority of Liens, Encumbrances and Interests (“Complaint”) (Doc. 1) filed by Andrew W. Suhar, Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”), on December 7, 2015. Defendant Fred W. Brown (“Defendant” or “Mr. Brown”) fil

Brown, Judge. [1] Thomas J. Feehan and Michelle Ceuterick-Feehan (the "Feehans") appeal the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of CitiMortgage, Inc., ("CitiMortgage") and its denial of their motion to strike. We affirm. Facts and Procedural History [2] In December 2002, Thomas Feehan executed a pr

173 P.3d 1041 (2008) In re MICHELLE G. No. 1 CA-JV 2007-0014. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. January 10, 2008. *1042 Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney By Ellen R. Brown, Tucson, Attorneys for State. Robert J. Hooker, Pima County Public Defender By Susan C.L. Kelly, Tucson, Attorneys for Minor.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: On December 27, 1985, members of the Abu Nidal Organization attacked the international flights terminals in Rome’s Leonardo da Vinci Airport and Vienna’s Schwechat Airport, killing sixteen people *1166

GAZIANO, J. **600 The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether the Commonwealth is required to prove a defendant knows that a firearm in his or her possession is loaded in order to be convicted

In re Galmon, Julia M.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 461-181; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 CA 0816. Denied.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Roger A. Page, J. An Obion County grand jury indicted Tony Alan Winsett, Janet Michelle Stanfield, and Justin Bradley Stanfield for multiple drug and weapons charges based on the warrantless search of their home and the subsequent automobile stop involving defendants Winsett and Janet Stanfield. The defendants filed motions to suppress the evidence against them b

526 S.E.2d 686 (2000) Michelle R. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Scottie K. SMITH, Defendant. No. COA99-304. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 21, 2000. *687 Gabriel, Berry & Weston, by M. Douglas Berry, Greensboro, for the plaintiff-appellee. Carol A. Simpson, Greensboro, for the defendant-appellant. LEWIS, Judge

SPRINGWOOD * NO. 2024-CA-0202 HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE GUTHERIE- * BROWN STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

Decision PER CURIAM: T1 A Healthy Choice (Healthy Choice) appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Michelle, Kelly, and Kelsey Brown and dismissing the action. We affirm. T2 Months after the close of discovery in this matter, the Browns moved to dismiss the case based on Healthy Choice's failure t

Matter of Michelle S. v Luke R. (2021 NY Slip Op 01330) Matter of Michelle S. v Luke R. 2021 NY Slip Op 01330 Decided on March 04, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure

Matter of Michelle S. v Luke R. (2021 NY Slip Op 01330) Matter of Michelle S. v Luke R. 2021 NY Slip Op 01330 Decided on March 04, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure

OPINION VAIDIK, Judge. Case Summary Samuel G. Dykstra and Michelle L. Ba-hus appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Hammond. They contend that the Hammond Ordinances regulating firearms that are at issue violate Indiana Code section 35-47-11.1-2 and “adversely affect” them as individuals who

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 10, 2009) Before the Court is the motion of the defendant, Wendie Michel Brown, to dismiss the indictment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny the motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On November 6, 2008, Brown was charged with nineteen counts of wire fraud in violation of 18

217 F.3d 811 (10th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF - APPELLANT,v.MICHELLE CHERRY; LADONNA GIBBS; TERESA PRICE, ALSO KNOWN AS TERESA BROWN; SONYA PARKER, DEFENDANTS - APPELLEES,ANDJOSHUA PRICE, JR., ALSO KNOWN AS LIL' JUNE, ALSO KNOWN AS JUNE, ALSO KNOWN AS JUNE ANDERSON, DEFENDANT No. 99-7019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT June 12

ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. In ongoing sequelae to defendants’ January 7; 2013 motion to terminate this action (hereafter “termination motion”) (ECF No. 4275), two additional motions brought by plaintiffs for enforcement of court orders and affirmative relief are before the court.1 On May 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion related to housing and treat<