Cases

527 S.E.2d 426 (2000) 259 Va. 448 James S. GILMORE, III, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, et al. v. Michele P. FINN. Michele P. Finn v. James S. Gilmore, III, et al. Record Nos. 990779, 990796. Supreme Court of Virginia. March 3, 2000. *427 Anne Marie Whittemore (Mark L. Earley, Attorn

OPINION BY Judge COVEY. Joseph O’Hara (O’Hara) and Finn Land Corporation (Finn Land) (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal from the Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court’s (trial court) March 12, 2013 order denying their motion for class certification in litigation against the Philadelphia County Sheriff’s Office (Sheriffs Office). Before we address this Court’s

Berger v. Berger IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-90-093-CV BRIAN BERGER, APPELLANT

ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge. This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Dickinson v. Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 119 S.Ct. 1816, 144 L.Ed.2d 143, 50 USPQ2d 1930 (1999) (“Zurko III”). In Zurko III, the Court reversed our judgment and remanded the case because we had reviewed the factual findings of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) for clear error,

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-12-0000538 13-MAY-2013 04:04 PM NO. SCIVIF-12-0000538

MCDONALD, J., dissenting. The majority here rewrites General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 12-53 (a) and (b) to give the tax assessor three years to revalue personal property listed on a taxpayer list and filed with the assessor. They do so because it is more reasonable, in their opinion, to have a longer period than that found in General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 12-55. Section 12-55 explicitly gives the assessor the

Justice Boyd delivered the opinion of the Court. The Deepwater Horizon drilling-rig incident has been called "the largest accidental marine oil spill in U.S. history." 1 After the initial blow-out and explosions claimed eleven lives, the waves of escaping oil "began a human, economic, and environmental disaste

OPINION OF THE COURT This appeal concerns the method for excluding impairment from a non-compen-sable disability when calculating a worker’s permanent partial disability benefit under the post-1996 version of KRS 342.730(l)(b). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) calculated a benefit based on the claimant’s entire post-injury permanent impairment rating and then subtracted an amount equal to a benefit based on his pre-exi

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CHARLES RICHARD RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JAMES M. DORTON, Defendant-Appellee. SOUTH CAROLINA SHERIFF'S No. 94-7120 ASSOCIATION; J. AL CANNON, Sheriff of Charleston, South Carolina; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; VIRGINIA SHERIFFS ASSOCATION; VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE ASSOCIATION, Amici Curiae. Appeal from the United

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE HENNESSEE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT McMAHON, District Judge. The court, for its opinion disposing of the motion to dismiss the complaint as filed by defendants The Hennessee Group LLC, Elizabeth Lee Hennessee and Charles Gradante (hereafter, “The Hen-nessee Defendants”): Procedural Posture

170 F.Supp.2d 388 (2001) Genaro ROSA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. No. 99 Civ. 3499(JSR). No. 97 CR. 829(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 18, 2001. *389 *390 *391 *392

GLAZER, J., Named plaintiffs Joseph O’Hara and his company Finn Land Corp. purport to represent two classes of persons aggrieved by the Sheriffs Office of Philadelphia County’s mishandling of excess proceeds from the sale of foreclosed properties. Plaintiffs define those two classes as follows: *56a. Each owner of real property within the

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiff Tiffani Johnson, a former employee of humor website CollegeHu-mor.com, brings this action alleging racial *507discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“ § 1981”) and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”). Plaintiff specifically claims that defendants engaged in rac

MEMORANDUM, DECISION, & ORDER AFTER BENCH TRIAL SEYBERT, District Judge: Plaintiff Sleepy’s LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “Sleepy’s”) commenced this action against defendants Select Comfort Wholesale Corporation, Select Comfort Retail Corporation, and Select Comfort Corporation (collectively “Defendant” or “Select Comfort”) seeking, inter alia, damages resulting from Select Comfort’s alleged

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-560V (Originally filed under seal: October 13, 2020) (Re-filed: November 12, 2020) 1 ************************** JEAN YATES Individually and as representative of the late ROBERT YATES, National Childhood Petitioner, Vaccine Injury Act, 42

729 F.Supp.2d 1276 (2010) In re SEMGROUP ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P., Securities Litigation. No. 08-MD-1989-GKF-FHM. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. April 30, 2010. Opinion Granting Reconsideration in Part and Denying Reconsideration in Part July 30, 2010. *1281 Laurence D. Paskowitz, Paskowitz & Associates, R

OPINION BY ALLEN, J.: Danny M. Alexander (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Patron’s Mutual Fire Association of Northwestern Pennsylvania (“Patron’s Mutual”), and the City of Meadville (“City”). We affirm. The trial court summarized the facts of this case as follows: This action arises out of a slip-and-fall accident suffered

258 F.3d 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2001) IN RE MARY E. ZURKO, THOMAS A. CASEY, JR., MORRIE GASSER, JUDITH S. HALL, CLIFFORD E. KAHN, ANDREW H. MASON, PAUL D. SAWYER, LESLIE R. KENDALL, AND STEVEN B. LIPNER. No. 96-1258, 07/479,666 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT August 2, 2001 On remand from the Supreme Court

700 F.Supp.2d 119 (2010) In re PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY. Misc. No. 08-0444 (TFH). Civil Action Nos. 02-cv-1130, 04-cv-1135, 04-cv-1144, 04-cv-1194, 04-cv-1227, 04-cv-1254, 05-cv-0023, 05-cv-0345, 05-cv-0490, 05-cv-0520, 05-cv-0526, 05-cv-0584, 05-cv-0586, 05-cv-0640, 05-cv-0714, 05-cv-0723, 05-cv-0764, 05-cv-0765, 05-cv-0878, 05-cv-0833, 05-cv-0887, 05-cv-0888, 05-cv-

ORDER FRANK R. ZAPATA, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and appointment of class counsel. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.1 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class action based on state based negligence and breach of fiduciary duty