Cases

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 14, 2019, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv

PETTIGREW, J. lain this workers’ compensation dispute, Industrial Metal Recyclers, Inc. (“Industrial”) and its insurer, The Gray Insurance Company (“Gray”), appeal a judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation (“OWC”) in favor of claimant, Maurice Vil-lar. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On July 18, 2000, Mr. Villar was injured in the course and

[Cite as State v. Johnston, 2013-Ohio-4401.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 25652 v. : T.C. NO. 00CR841 ADAM C. JOHNSTON : (Criminal appeal from

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [Re: Docket No. 10] RONALD M. WHYTE, United States District Judge The issue before the court is whether Sunnyvale’s ordinance outlawing the possession of firearm magazines having a capacity to accept more than ten rounds should be preliminarily enjoined for infringing individuals’ Second Amendment rights. The core of the Second Amendme

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Erik Segelstrom and Cathie Hamer, who are proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against five “Doe” defendants and seven named defendants — Citibank N.A. (“Citibank”), Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar”), Sheriff Thomas All-man, in his personal and private cap

458 F.Supp.2d 775 (2006) INDIANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Todd ROKITA, et al., Defendants. No. l:05-CV-0634-SEB-VSS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. April 14, 2006. *782 Barry A. Macey, Macey Swanson and Allman, Geoffrey S. Lohman, William R. Groth, Fillenwarth Dennerline

504 S.E.2d 802 (1998) Anna Mae SHERRILL, Annetta C. White, Linda S. Mintz, Vernette Price, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION a/k/a Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Amoco Oil Company; BP Exploration & Oil Inc.; Citgo Petroleum Corporation; Colonial Pipe Line Company; Conoco, Inc. a/k/a Southern Facilities; Crown Central Petroleum Corporation; Exxon Corporation; Marathon Oil Compa

77 B.R. 561 (1987) In re John G. BUHAY, Debtor. Lyndon WATSON, et al. v. John G. BUHAY and Martin W. Seidler, Interim Trustee. Bankruptcy No. 5-85-00798-E, Adv. No. 5-85-0206E. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. September 18, 1987. *562 Kay Mary Kober Harrell, San Antonio, Tex., for debtor. Do

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED October 28, 1998 MICHAEL ALLEN LANCE, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Sumner Circuit ) No. 16685-C VS. )

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971 LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL 3:09-cv-02371- ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, IEG-BGS Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff, Defenda

23 F.Supp.2d 1091 (1998) Marilyn OLMER, an Individual, John Kelly, an Individual, Theresa Lane, an Individual, and Michelle Mann, an Individual, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LINCOLN, a Municipality, William Austin, in his Official Capacity as Lincoln City Attorney, and Thomas Casady, in his Capacity as Chief of the Lincoln Police Department, Defendants. No. 4:98CV3311. United States District Court, D. Nebras

140 Ill. App.3d 318 (1986) 488 N.E.2d 1056 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOEL JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-0088. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed January 24, 1986. *319 Daniel D. Yuhas and Judith N. Kirby, both of State Appellate Defender's Off

STARCHER, Chief Justice. In this appeal from the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, we are asked to examine a circuit court order denying a motion to certify a class action for users of an allegedly defective prescription drug. After consideration of the briefs, the arguments of the parties, and all other matters of record, we conclude that the circuit court erred, and reverse and remand the ease for proceedings as a class action.

ACCEPTED 03-13-00025-CV 6630730 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

585 S.E.2d 52 (2003) 214 W.Va. 52 In re WEST VIRGINIA REZULIN LITIGATION and State of West Virginia, ex rel. Sandra McCaffery, et al., Petitioners, v. The Honorable John A. Hutchison, Judge of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County; Warner-Lambert Company; and Parke-Davis, Respondents. Nos. 30958, 30963. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submit

15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5

515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei