Cases

WILLIAMS, J. hThe defendant, Eric Dale Mickel-son, was charged by a grand jury indictment with first degree murder, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30. A jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty as charged and recommended the death penalty; the trial court formally sentenced the defendant to death. Following a direct appeal to the Louisiana Supreme Court, the defendant’s conviction and sentence were reversed and the matter was r

821 So.2d 39 (2002) Donald NYQUIST v. JEFFERSON PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE & Shawn Michel. No. 01-CA-1378. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 15, 2002. *40 Robert J. Caluda, Stephen C. Juan, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Edmund W. Golden, Golden & Fonte, Metairie, LA, for Defendants/Appellees

MEMORANDUM OPINION Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge Plaintiff John L. McKinney, Jr. filed this action against his employer, G4S Government Solutions, Inc. (G4S), asserting the following claims: (1) a hostile work environment claim under both 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, based on his race (African-American); (2) a retaliatio

*1438This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education,

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit

315 S.W.3d 494 (2010) FROST NATIONAL BANK, Former Executor of the Estate of Elena Suess Kenedy, Deceased, and Frost National Bank and Pablo Suess, Trustees of the John G. Kenedy, Jr. Charitable Trust, Petitioners, v. Ann M. FERNANDEZ, Respondent. No. 08-0534. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued December 15, 2009. Decided April 16, 2010. Rehearing De

505 F.Supp.2d 456 (2007) Jerry R. KENNEDY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ZANESVILLE, OHIO, et al., Defendants. No. 2:03-CV-1047. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 7, 2007. *457 *458 *459 *460

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the court’s result that Plaintiffs have standing to challenge the provisions at issue,1 that the Salt Lake County Clerk, Governor, and Attorney General were proper Defendants, and that the appeal may proceed despite the absence of the Salt Lake County Clerk. I disagree w

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-DR-00269-SCT TIMOTHY ROBERT RONK a/k/a TIMOTHY RONK a/k/a TIMOTHY R. RONK v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/08/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LISA P. DODSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: GRAHAM PATRICK CARNER CAROL R

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

909 N.E.2d 415 (2009) In the Matter of FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS and/or NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES. No. 94S00-0905-MS-210. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 5, 2009. ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIRE

671 F.3d 881 (2011) In re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION, Tash Hepting; Gregory Hicks; Erik Knutzen; Carolyn Jewel, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AT & T Corporation; AT & T, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, United States of America, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. Sean Basinski, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; All Plaintiffs

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS RANDALL T. SHEPARD, Chief Justice. The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be lieensed to practice law in Indiana, or to file an exemption affidavit as contem

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 461–521 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................332 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................335 III. LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT........................337 IV. MONELL LIABILITY..................................

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and (2) Defendants’ Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice. [Doc. 94.] Plaintiffs filed an opposition, [Doc. No. 107], and Defendants fi

OPINIÓN OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge.- TABLE OF CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION............,.............:................../.......:. 420 II.BACKGROUND...............................................•........'..421 A Concussion Suits Are Brought Against the NFL.......................

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0061 Filed June 30, 2017 Amended September 20, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KELVIN PLAIN SR., Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Nathan Callahan, Judge. Defendant appeals conviction for harassment in the first degree. AFFIRMED ON CONDITION AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Gary Dicke