Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Khachatur Balbabyan, a native of the former Soviet Union and citizen of Armenia, seeks review of a June 13, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the March 1, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Annette S. Elstein denying Balbabyan’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Khachatur Balbabyan, No. A95 165 635 (B.I.A. June 13, 2006),

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: The United States appeals and Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant William *113Woodrow Wilson (“Wilson”) cross-appeals from a November 17, 2004, judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Wood, /.), granting habeas relief to Wilson and remanding the case to the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) f

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Trinidad Ramos Michel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings and its previous *656decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We deny the petitions for review. The BIA considered

STEPHENS, J. *616Defendant, Lake Bruin Landing and Marina, L.L.C., appeals a judgment by the Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Tensas, State of Louisiana, finding it was in violation of valid building restrictions imposed on its property and granting injunctive relief sought by Plaintiff, George Bagley, Jr., as trustee of the Michele Bag

SUMMARY ORDER Mohamed Limam Ould Ahmed Sleymane, a citizen of Mauritania, seeks review of a May 31, 2006 order of the BIA affirming immigration judge (“U”) Noel Brennan’s December 22, 2004 decision denying Sleymane’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Mohamed Limam Ould Ahmed Sleymane, No. A95 406 626 (B.I.A. May 31, 2006), aff'g

MEMORANDUM ** Sukhjit Singh Thiara, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen to reapply for asylum based on changed country conditions. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion, see Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 4

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00350-CV MICHELLE LATRAY AS RECEIVER OF THE ASSETS OF CLIFTON BOATRIGHT FOR THE BENEFIT OF JUDGMENT CREDITORS W.L. ROBERTS, DANA ROBERTS, ERIN LEIGH ROBERTS, AND KATELYN ROBERTS GONZALES, APPELLANT V. COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY

MEMORANDUM ** Aldo Alonzo Jimenez-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s removal order and denying his motion to remand. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Parrilla v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review in par

SUMMARY ORDER Hen Shi Yang, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. Although Yang’s motion was before the BIA as a motion to reopen, it was styled as a motion to reconsider. See In re Cerna, 20 I. & N. Dec. 399, 402-03, 1991 WL 353528 (BIA 19

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Magdalena Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, see Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 84

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00350-CV MICHELLE LATRAY AS RECEIVER OF THE ASSETS OF CLIFTON BOATRIGHT FOR THE BENEFIT OF JUDGMENT CREDITORS W.L. ROBERTS, DANA ROBERTS, ERIN LEIGH ROBERTS, AND KATELYN ROBERTS GONZALES, APPELLANT V. COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY

MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Alberto Campos-Franco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *576(“BIA”) order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal, and the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the p

MEMORANDUM *** Petitioner Washington Pena-Flores, a native and citizen of Ecuador, petitions for review of the order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s ruling that Petitioner’s conviction for grand theft under CahPenal Code § 487(a) makes him removable for having committed an “aggravated felony.” Although we lack jurisdiction to review a final order of removal,

MEMORANDUM ** Ofelia Guzman Garcia (Guzman), a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to remand her case to the immigration judge (IJ) for proceedings on her application to adjust status, and affirming the IJ’s finding that she had filed a frivolous application for asylum. The BIA denied Guzman’s motion to remand on the

GARY W. LYNCH, J. Butterball, L.L.C., and its insurer, Ace American Insurance Company (collectively “Employer”), appeal the award of permanent total disability benefits to Eleazar Gonzales for an injury to his right hand on August 7, 2009. In a single point relied on, Employer claims the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“the Commission”) award is erroneous because it is not supported by sufficient and competent e

Petition for review denied and judgment affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge KING joined. GREGORY, Circuit Judge. Aissatou Barry, on behalf of herself and her six-year-old daughter, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen. Because Barry relie

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. The issue on this appeal is whether the federal statute prohibiting an abortion *281method generally medically known as dilation and extraction (“D & X”) and sometimes colloquially and in federal and state statutes called “partial birth abortion” is unconstitutional for lack of an exception permitting the procedure to be used to prote

464 F.3d 993 Mariano GRANADOS-OSEGUERA, Petitioner,v.Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 03-73030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 17, 2006. Filed September 25, 2006. Mary Beth Canty, Laura Boyle, Josh Chetwynd, Law Students, T

NO. 07-03-0010-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MAY 20, 2003 ______________________________ MICHELLE ELIZABETH GONZALES,

NO. 07-03-0010-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E MAY 20, 2003 ______________________________ MICHELLE ELIZABETH GONZALES, Appellant