⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michelle Diane Denton”

Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2015 Session MICHELLE RYE ET AL. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Western Section Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00092009 Gina C. Higgins, Judge ________________________
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015-10-26 · Published · cited 989× · 477 S.W.3d 235; 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 906; 2015 WL 6457768
OPINION Cornelia A. Clark, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Jeffrey S. Bivins, J., joined. Sharon G. Lee, C.J;, and Jeffrey S. Bivins, J., each filed separate concurring opinions. Gary R. Wade, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Holly Kirby, J., not participating. We granted perinission to appeal in this healthcare liability acti
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2023-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ark. 67
Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
District Court, N.D. New York · 2017-01-03 · Published · cited 1× · 227 F. Supp. 3d 216; 2017 WL 24774; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2294
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 225 A. Defendants. ... 226 1. Municipal Defendants. ... 226 2. Medical Defendants. ... 226 3. Security Defendants. ... 226 B. Causes of Action. ... 226 C. Moti
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-12-10 · Published · cited 2× · 987 F. Supp. 2d 369; 2013 WL 6480445; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175287
OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: Before the Court is an August 13, 2013 motion for partial judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., filed by certain of the individual defendants in these actions. The motion requires the Court to decide whether the SEC radically altered Section 11 liability for individuals who sign registration statements in the context of the shelf
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-09-15 · Published · cited 2× · 766 F.3d 1205; 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1880; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17946; 2014 WL 4494859
OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: The “anti-cutback” rule of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1054(g), prohibits any amendment of an employee benefits plan that would reduce a participant’s “accrued benefit.” Our question is whether Defendants’ (collectively, “DHL”) decision to eliminate Plaintiffs’ right to tran
District Court, D. Arizona · 2011-08-26 · Published · cited 10× · 810 F. Supp. 2d 929; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96162
ORDER: (1) GRANTING HONEYWELL’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (2) GRANTING CORNING’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (3) GRANTING UNIVAR’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (k) GRANTING SRP’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (5) GRANTING DOLPHIN’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY; (6) DENYING ARVIN AND COOPER’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge. On May 2, 2011, the Court heard Defendant Honeywell International, Inc.’s Motion t
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 70× · 749 F.3d 879
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2013-03-07 · Published · cited 3× · 445 S.W.3d 242; 2013 WL 842652
Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM
Smith v. Hendersonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-07-18 · Published · cited 2× · 54 F. Supp. 3d 58; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 494; 2014 WL 3555310; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97617
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge A perusal of any newspaper reveals an indisputable truth: People hold strong and divergent views regarding the future of public education. Today’s headlines capture rampant debates about everything from teachers’ unions to charter schools to the new “Common Core” State Standa
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-10-27 · Published · cited 0× · 508 S.W.3d 703; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 11693; 2016 WL 6277368
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00311-CR FRED EARL INGERSON, III APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD CO
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 Ark. 200
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010-07-30 · Published · cited 23× · 321 S.W.3d 398; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 998; 2010 WL 2990531
321 S.W.3d 398 (2010) In re the Marriage of: Claire Noland-Vance and Brent Vance, Claire NOLAND-VANCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brent VANCE, Respondent-Respondent. No. SD 28699. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. July 30, 2010. Motion for Rehearing or Reconsideration and Transfer Denied August 23, 2010. Application
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 1990-06-13 · Published · cited 42× · 793 S.W.2d 701; 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 2102; 1990 WL 120094
793 S.W.2d 701 (1990) The CITY OF DALLAS, Texas, Appellant, v. Suzanne COX, Individually and as Next Friend of Carrie Cox and Courtney Cox, Minors, as well as Suzanne Cox, Executrix of the Estate of Ronnie Cox, Deceased; R.D. Cox; and the Town of Addison, Appellees. No. 05-89-00216-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. June 13, 1990. Rehearing Denied August 20
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 316× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
District Court, D. Maryland · 1994-01-14 · Published · cited 34× · 849 F. Supp. 1022; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4056; 1994 WL 60894
849 F.Supp. 1022 (1994) MARYLANDERS FOR FAIR REPRESENTATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. William Donald SCHAEFER, et al., Defendants. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR The ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. William Donald SCHAEFER, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. S-92-510, S-92-1409. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 14, 1994.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 2× · 447 B.R. 475; 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1312; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 672; 51 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 73
447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 1, 2013 Session ROBERT FAULKNER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 99-07635 W. Otis Higgs, Jr., Judge No. W2012-00612-CCA-R3-PD - Filed August 29, 2014 The Petitioner, Robert Faulkner, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief
United States Court of Claims · 1992-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 26 Cl. Ct. 1119; 1992 U.S. Claims LEXIS 412; 1992 WL 220416
ORDER YOCK, Judge. This civilian overtime and premium pay dispute is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed on June 4, 1990. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Facts All the plaintiffs in this case are guards employed by the United States Department of
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00060-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS NO. 15-25-00060-CV 12/9/2025 5:13 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE