Cases

PAUL G. BYRON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Amended Motion and Memorandum *1294for Class Certification (Doc. 106), filed March 2, 2017. Defendant filed a response in opposition (Doc. 110), on March 17, 2017. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification is denied.

39 Cal.Rptr.3d 758 (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 64 OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. John GARAMENDI, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California, et al., Defendants and Respondents; The California Fair Plan Association, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Nos. A106606, A107365. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two.</

616 F.3d 904 (2010) MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA Entertainment (HK) Limited, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; Isaac Larian, an individual, Counter-defendants-Appellants, Carter Bryant, an individual, Plaintiff-counter-defendant, *905 Carlos Gustavo Machado Gomez, an individual; MGAE de Mexico, S.R.L

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiffs U.S. Futures Exchange, LLC ("USFE") and U.S. Exchange Holdings, Inc. ("UEH") bring this antitrust case against defendants Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. ("CBOT") and Chicago *1237Mercantile Exchange, Inc. ("CME").1 Plaintiffs allege

733 F.Supp.2d 943 (2010) Jason HUGHES, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HURON CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Gary E. Holdren, Gary L. Burge, and Wayne Lipski, Defendants. No. 09 C 4734. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 6, 2010. *944 Leigh Robbin Handelman, P

OPINION AND ORDER Kelly, Judge: Before the court is the Government of Korea’s (“GOK”) motion to intervene in this action as of right under USCIT Rule 24(a), See Intervenor-Applicant Government of Korea’s Partial Consent- Mot. Intervene As of Right, Nov. 2, 2016, ECF No. 34 (“Mot. Intervene”); see also US-CIT R. 24(a). GOK acknowledges that it seeks to

36 A.3d 785 (2011) Steven E. KLIG, Plaintiff, v. DELOITTE LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP, each a Delaware Limited Liability Partnership, Defendants. C.A. No. 4993-VCL. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: September 20, 2011. Decided: November 21, 2011. *787 Richard R. Wier, Jr., Michele

452 F.Supp.2d 276 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. In re United States of America, v. Jeffrey Stein, et al., Defendants. Jeffrey Stein, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KPMG LLP, Defendant. No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). No. 06 Ctv. 5007(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 18, 2006.

NUMBER 13-99-738-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ CITY OF ROBSTOWN, NOE GARZA, JULIAN OLIVERA, J.B. TALLEY, AND

472 F.Supp.2d 172 (2007) Albert L. GRAY, Administrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey DERDERIAN, et al., Defendants. Estate of Jude B. Henault, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Foam Corporation, et al., Defendants. In re Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Polar Industries, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. C.A. Nos. 04-312L, 03-483L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.</

461 F.Supp.2d 201 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jeffrey STEIN, et al., Defendants. No. S1 05 Crim. 0888(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 13, 2006. Craig D. Margolis, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Michael James Madigan, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Leon Rodriguez, Ober, Kalen, Grimes & Shriver, Ernest Lawrence Barcell

565 F.3d 924 (2009) AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, solely in its capacity as Indenture Trustee on behalf of all Holders of Affiliated Computer Services Incs's *925 5.20% Senior Notes Due 2015 and all Holders of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.'s 4.70% Senior Notes Due 2010, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-10235. Un

990 A.2d 940 (2010) In re REVLON, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. C.A. No. 4578-VCL. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: March 5, 2010. Decided: March 16, 2010. *941 Seth D. Rigrodsky and Brian D. Long, Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert M. Kornreich and Carl L. Stine, Wolf Popper, LLP, New York City,

464 F.Supp.2d 105 (2006) Albert L. GRAY, Administrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey DERDERIAN, et al., Defendants. Estate of Jude B. Henault, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Foam Corporation; et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 04-312L, 03-483L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. December 12, 2006. *106 Patric

493 F.Supp.2d 158 (2007) Leah MCMORRIS and Wendy L. Pignone, individually and as representatives of a proposed class, Plaintiffs, v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., and The TJX Operating Companies, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A.07-10162-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 26, 2007. *159 John Michael Barclay, Richard

MEMORANDUM OPINION Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff John Doe1 seeks summary judgment in his *716favor as to liability on the sole remaining claim in his amended complaint: a claim that defendants deprived him of a property right—

MEMORANDUM OPINION Elizabeth K. Dillon, United States District Judge In August 2014, plaintiff “John Doe”1 enrolled as a freshman at James Madison University (JMU or University)-, a public institution, in Harrisonburg, Virginia; During his first week on campus, he met another freshman, “Jane Roe,”2 and the two had sex. A couple of months later, Roe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M. G. LYNN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [Docket Entry # 13] and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket Entry # 21]. For the reasons stated below, both Motions are DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs The Elite Rodeo Association (“ERA”), and Trevor Brazile, Bobby Mote

Defendant Maple Parent Holdings Corp. ("Maple Parent") is a private entity that indirectly owns non-party Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., a leader in specialty coffee and single-serve brewing systems.7 Non-party JAB Holdings Company S.à r.l. ("JAB") controls Maple Parent.8 Plaintiffs City of North Miami Beach General Employees' Retirement Plan and Maitland Police Officers and Firefighte

GÓMEZ, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 20, 2008) Before the Court is the motion of the defendants, WVC St. John, Inc. d/b/a Westin St. John Resort & Villas and Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc. (together, the “Defendants”), to dismiss Counts Thirteen and Fourteen of the complaint of the plaintiff, Etel Lima-Brito Dias (“Dias”). I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURA