Cases

SACK, Circuit Judge: It is not uncommon for corporate employers to compensate their high-ranking employees not only with cash, but also with equity in the corporation. Such arrangements align the employees’ financial incentives with, those of the company: If the company succeeds financially, so too do its stake-holding employees; but if the company falters—even to and beyond the point of bankruptcy—its employees bear some of

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Apr 06 2017, 9:50 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals regarded

415 B.R. 77 (2009) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtor. Bay Harbour Management, L.C., et al., Appellants, v. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 08 Civ. 8869(DLC), 08 Civ. 8914(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 13, 2009. *78 David S. Rosner, Andrew K. Glenn, Ronald R.

Justice Indeglia, for the Court. In this foreclosure action, the defendants, Michele Perretta 1 and Anna M. Perretta (the Perrettas), appeal from a Superior Court order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, *100

[Cite as Gen. Auto Ins., Co., Inc. v. Lehman, 2025-Ohio-1015.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY THE GENERAL AUTOMOBILE CASE NO. 2024-A-0066 INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas - vs - KYLEE LEHMAN, et

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RICHARD LEHMAN, on behalf of No. 18-35321 himself and others similarly situated; MICHAEL D.C. No. PUTERBAUGH, 2:13-cv-01835-RSM Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ORDER AND OPINION WARNER NELSON; WILLIAM BECK, JR.; BRIAN BISH; KLAAS A. DEBOER; MICHAEL G. MARSH; ROCKY

FILE COPY BRIAN QUINN Chief Justice Court of Appeals PEGGY CULP CLERK JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice Seventh District of Texas MAILING ADDRESS:

16‐1296‐bk (L), 16‐1360‐bk, 16‐1361‐bk, 16‐1363‐bk, 16‐1365‐bk In re: Lehman Bros. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2016 4 (Argued: January 4, 2017 Decided: May 4, 2017) 5 Docket Nos. 16‐1296‐bk, 16‐1304‐bk, 16‐1306‐bk, 16‐1360‐bk, 16‐1361‐bk, 16‐1363‐ 6

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 2-10-089-CR 2-10-090-CR 2-10-091-CR 2-10-092-CR MICHELLE LEHMAN APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 2-10-089-CR 2-10-090-CR 2-10-091-CR 2-10-092-CR MICHELLE LEHMAN APPELLANT

<

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LEHMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, FOR PUBLICATION August 17, 2023 Petitioner-Appellant,

952 P.2d 1105 (1998) Lyle COVINGTON, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. W.R. GRACE-CONN., INC., Appellee (Defendant). No. 96-325. Supreme Court of Wyoming. January 16, 1998. David A. Drell of Brooks, Henley & Drell P.C., Casper; and J. Conard Metcalf of Williams & Trine, P.C., Boulder, for Appellant. Kathleen B. Dixon and Michele L. Lorenzen of Murane & Bo

433 B.R. 113 (2010) In re LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-13555(JMP). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 20, 2010. *117 Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, Shai Y. Waisman, Esq., Mark Bernstein, Esq., New York, NY, Attorneys for Debtors. Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, Paul J. Labov, Esq.

ORDER PROST, Circuit Judge. Mattel, Inc. moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and dismiss James A. Lehman’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Lehman opposes. Mattel replies. Mattel argues that the court should dismiss this appeal because it stems from a complaint seeking declaratory relief related to copyright infringement, an area outside the court’s subject

NUMBER 13-17-00431-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ESTATE OF W.R. DURRILL, DECEASED On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas. OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Rodri

851 F.2d 1372 100 A.L.R.Fed. 795 Ronald J. CORNETTA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The UNITED STATES of America and John Lehman, Secretary ofthe Navy, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-1121. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit. June 20, 1988. George S. King, Mangham, Hardy, Rolfs

[Cite as State v. J.R., 2022-Ohio-1664.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110521 v. : J.R., :

604 F.3d 1363 (2010) DORBEST LIMITED, Rui Feng Woodwork (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., and Rui Feng Lumber Development (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade, and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Company, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Cabinet Makers, Millmen and Industrial Carpenters Local 721, UBC Southern Council of Industrial Workers Local 2305, United Steel Workers of America

14 F.Supp.2d 331 (1998) MICHELE POMMIER MODELS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEN WOMEN NY MODEL MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant. MEN WOMEN NY MODEL MANAGEMENT, INC., Third Party Plaintiff, v. Elsa Benitez YANEZ and Samuel Burstyn, Third Party Defendants. No. 97 Civ. 6837 (SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 1998. *