Cases

2021 UT App 42 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LILLIAN ACKLEY, Petitioner, v. LABOR COMMISSION AND LOWE’S, Respondents. Opinion No. 20190806-CA Filed April 15, 2021 Original Proceeding in this Court Stony Olsen and Michael G. Belnap, Att

OPINION MESSITTE, District Judge. This is a relator’s suit under the qui tarn provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. Following the Court’s Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint,1 Defendants were directed to file pleadings responsive to Count III, the only count r

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 11–0117 Filed July 6, 2012 MICHELE M. PITTS, Appellant, vs. FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and DONALD SCHIFFER, Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Monica L. Ackley, Judge. Plaintiff seeks further review of the court of appeals decision affirming a district court order g

76 F.Supp.2d 654 (1999) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Robert D. ACKLEY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. PJM 97-3189. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 17, 1999. *655 Walter G. Birkel, Tighe, Patton, Tabackman & Babbin, LLC, Washington, D.C., Dean Fra

110 F.Supp.2d 395 (2000) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Robert D. ACKLEY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. PJM 97-3189. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. July 27, 2000. *396 *397 Thomas Earl Patton, Walter G.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARISA C. SMITH, Appellant, v. SHOMA HOMES AT NAUTICA SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC. and MIRETG INVESTMENTS, Appellees. No. 4D2023-0994 [February 1, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seven

128 F.3d 77 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1849,73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,289Mark ABDU-BRISSON; Ronald H. Buchner; Gordon Burgess;Robert Burke; Thomas D. Callahan; Thomas F. Carey; DaleE. Carman; Louis Carrara; T. Barry Casey; Lamar Cason;Robert T. Cassidy; Robert Changery; Larry E. Chappel;Richard Charbonneau; Stanley Checkoway; Douglas S.Christensen; Lee J. Church; James Cirilli; Robert Clack;Walter M.

863 P.2d 1099 (1993) 116 N.M.App. 478 Kilroy TODACHEENE, Claimant-Appellant, v. G & S MASONRY, Travelers Indemnity and Arizona State Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund, Respondents-Appellees. No. 13781. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. September 23, 1993. Certiorari Denied November 1, 1993.

JUSTICE TODD, concurring and dissenting I join the Majority Opinion with the exception of the majority’s formulation and application, in Part II.A.2, of its rule for determining whether a prospective juror should be dismissed on the ground that his employment relationship with a party-defendant is sufficiently close to warrant a presumption of prejudice. In my view, the majori

[Cite as State v. Ford, 2021-Ohio-4608.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 110463 v. : GEOFFREY M. FORD, :

OPINION CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: This case involves a new runway at Hillsboro Airport, a general aviation airport near Portland, Oregon. We previously considered a challenge to the original environmental assessment done for the new runway project in Barnes v. United States Department of Transportation, 655 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2011) <

[Cite as State v. Harris, 2020-Ohio-1497.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108377 v. : DWAYNE HARRIS,

588 N.W.2d 711 (1998) In re the MARRIAGE OF Michele Renae BARRY and Kevin Chauncey Barry. Upon the Petition of Michele Renae Barry, Appellant, And Concerning Kevin Chauncey Barry, Appellee. No. 98-157. Court of Appeals of Iowa. November 30, 1998. *712 Michael L. Mollman of Mollman Law Office, Cedar Rapids, for appellant. K

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0734 Filed June 18, 2025 BRIAN CRAIG THORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. HEATHER LYNN WEBER, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Delaware County, Monica Zrinyi Ackley, Judge. A former spouse appeals an order following trial on a petition

OPINION BY PLATT, J. In this medical malpractice case, Appellants, Megan I. Shinal, 1 and Robert J. Shinal, her husband, appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Steven A. Toms, M.D., following a jury’s defense verdict of no liability on the issue of informed consent. Appellants chal

IKUTA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: It is conventional wisdom among aviators that “when the weight of the paper equals the weight of the airplane, only then you can go flying.” The majority confirms the truth of this quotation: here a federal agency is trying to reduce airport delays and the concomitant negative environmental effects by commencing a project in anticipation of future growth, and the majority si

REVERSED and Opinion Filed February 12, 1999 In The Court of Appeals iFtftli district of Qfexas at Dallas No. 05-96-00233-CR MICHELLE A. SAUNDERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cri

260 B.R. 174 (2001) In re Michael Evert LARSON, SS# XXX-XX-XXXX and Michele Rae Larson, SS# XXX-XX-XXXX, Debtors. No. 00-20711-SBB. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. March 12, 2001. *175 *176 *177 *178

Justice WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court. A criminal defendant’s right to counsel — enshrined in both the United States *144 and Texas Constitutions — ranks among the most important and fundamental rights in a free society. The plaintiffs in this civil action assert th

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to show causation is denied; their motion to exclude the opinions of Wesley Dennis, M.D. is granted in part and denied in part; and their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to individual defendant Michnal for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied.