Cases

137 F.Supp.2d 702 (2000) Marion DIXON, et al. v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., et al. Nos. CIV. A. 98-2456, CIV. A. 99-1819. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. September 11, 2000. *703 James Frederick Willeford, New Orleans, LA, for Michelle James Orso, Leroy Perry, Kevin Duthu, plaintiffs. Peter A. Feringa, Jr., Betty

JUSTICE BUCKLEY delivered the opinion of the court: This is an interlocutory appeal arising from the trial court’s partial denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss. We granted leave to appeal the following two questions certified by the trial court: (1) whether the terms of plaintiffs’ motor vehicle retail installment form contracts permit computation of the plai

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1379 BETTER WAY FORD, LLC; PEGGY A. CIANCHETTE; CIANCHETTE FAMILY, LLC; ERIC L. CIANCHETTE, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee, FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant. APPEA

162 B.R. 217 (1993) In re David E. LEE and Kathleen M. Lee, Debtors. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., Plaintiff, v. David Edward LEE and Kathleen Michelle Lee, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 3-93-892. Civ. No. 4-93-862. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. December 21, 1993. *218 Linda J. Jungers, Stewart, Slimen &a;

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FORD MOTOR CREDIT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO COMPANY, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v. CASE NO. 1D14-5837 MICHELLE L. WILLIS, SHERRY L. WILLIS, and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. f/k/a WACHOV

531 F.Supp. 379 (1981) Dennis MILLHOLLIN and Michelle Millhollin, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Dee Thomason Ford, a corporation, Defendants. Darrell MESSINGER, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Marv Tonkin Ford Sales, Inc., a corporation, Defendants. Donna M. EATON, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Bud Meadows Mazda, Inc., a corporation, Defendants.

87 B.R. 46 (1988) In re Michelle SUTTON, Debtor. Michelle SUTTON, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 3-87-02397, Adv. No. 3-87-0194. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. June 7, 1988. *47 William Sams, Miamisburg, Ohio, for debtor. Dennis L. Patterson, Dayton, Ohio, for defend

ORDER Before WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges and JAMESON,* Senior District Judge. This cause is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings pursuant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court rendered February 20, 1980, 100 S.Ct. 790, 63 L.Ed. 22. Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior U.S. District Judge, District of Montana.

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: In these consolidated cases, Ford Motor Credit Corporation (Ford Credit) and several Ford dealers appeal from adverse judgments finding that they violated provisions of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. (1976) (Act) and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq. (1978) (Regulation Z).1 Milhollin cross appe

198 F.Supp.2d 1070 (2002) Thomas L. NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Thomas J. Lyons, Jr., Consumer Justice Center, P.A., Thomas J. Lyons, Sr., and Thomas J. Lyons & Associates, Third-Party Defendants. No. Civ. 01-SC-754 (PAM/JGL) United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 19, 2002.

665 N.E.2d 843 (1996) Deborah A. ZWAYER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, and Eddie Roper, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Sandra BISHOP and Edith Terrell, Counterplaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ford Motor Credit Company, Counterdefendant-Appellant. No. 1-94-1646. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division.

680 S.E.2d 77 (2009) Josephine MORGAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., an Ohio corporation; and Francis Robert Morgan, Defendants Below, Appellees, and Michelle Archuleta, as Personal Representative of The Estate of Robert Francis Morgan, Cross-Claim Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation, Cross-Claim Defendant Below, Appellee.

618 F.2d 623 Dennis MILHOLLIN and Michelle Milhollin, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Dee Thomason Ford,a corporation, Defendants-Appellants.Dennis MILHOLLIN and Michelle Milhollin, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Dee Thomason Ford,a corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellees.Donna M. EATON, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a cor

588 F.2d 753 Dennis MILHOLLIN and Michelle Milhollin, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Dee Thomason Ford,a corporation, Defendants-Appellants.Dennis MILHOLLIN and Michelle Milhollin, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a corporation, and Dee Thomason Ford,a corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellees.Donna M. EATON, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO., a cor

29 Cal.Rptr.3d 401 (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1191 113 P.3d 82 Greg JOHNSON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. No. S121723. Supreme Court of California. June 16, 2005. *403 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, D. Gregg Durbin, Fr

590 F.Supp.2d 883 (2008) In re FORD MOTOR COMPANY ERISA LITIGATION. No. 06-11718. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 22, 2008. *885 Lynn L. Sarko, Derek W. Loeser, Keller Rohrback, L.L.P., Seattle, WA, Joseph H. Meltzer, Edward W. Ciolko, Gerald D. Wells, III, Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Che

627 N.W.2d 1 (2001) 245 Mich. App. 9 Vicki ASHKER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Michelle Ashker, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Ford Motor Credit Company, George G. Surdu, David Holman, Harry Mills, Howard Layson, George Halloran, Gerald Decker, Harold Collins, Ronald Bierman, Larry Rice, and William Odom, Defendants. Docket No. 214537.

628 N.W.2d 515 (2001) Blossom J. HAZLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Ford-UAW Retirement Board of Administration, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 116162, Calendar No. 9. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued April 4, 2001. Decided July 3, 2001. *518 Thomas E. Marshall, P.C. (by Thomas E. Marshall a

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 10A23 Filed 23 May 2024 LATOYA CANTEEN and PAMELA PHILLIPS v. CHARLOTTE METRO CREDIT UNION Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 286 N.C. App. 539 (2022), reversing an order entered on 7 September 2021 by Judge George C. Bell in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the

703 N.E.2d 484 (1998) 301 Ill. App.3d 364 234 Ill.Dec. 623 Joseph SPINA and Barbara Spina, individually, and as representatives on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, and Rock-Tred Corporation, a corporation, individually, and as representatives on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.