Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael v. Foss”
Foss v. Statepublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thur-ston County, No. 12-2-00370-7, Erik D. Price, J., entered April 12, 2013. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Wors-wick, J., concurred in by Maxa and Lee, JJ.
Michael L. Foss v. Dorothy Williamspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-IA-00615-SCT MICHAEL L. FOSS, M.D. v. DOROTHY WILLIAMS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PETER D. PRICE, DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/26/2007 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALBERT B. SMITH, III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JASON EDWARD DARE
People v. Fosspublic domain
65 Cal.Rptr.3d 790 (2007) 155 Cal.App.4th 113 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Raymond FOSS, Defendant and Appellant. No. C050992. Court of Appeal of California, Third District. September 13, 2007. *792 Carol A. Navone, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. B
McCoy v. Foss Maritime Co.public domain
442 F.Supp.2d 1103 (2006) Tommy MCCOY, Plaintiff, v. FOSS MARITIME COMPANY, Defendant. No. C04-2233L. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. May 31, 2006. *1104 Jeffery Michael Campiche, Campiche, Hepburn, Mccarty & Bianco, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff. Elizabeth Lynn Hubbard, Anna E. Johansson,
Department of Revenue v. Fosspublic domain
Dreben, J. The mother appeals from a judgment entered in 1997 on her complaint for modification of a child support order.1 While the judgment increased the father’s support obligation, it deviated substantially from the Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines (guidelines). Because the judge’s reasons and specific findings are insufficient to support a departure from the guidelines, the judgment of mod
Foss v. National Marine Fisheries Servicepublic domain
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This case calls upon us to decide whether an applicant for a federal fishing quota permit has a cognizable procedural due process claim. Appellant Richard Foss filed his application 45 days late and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) denied the application as untimely. Foss claims that the denial violated his procedural due process rights and also challenges the denial on other grounds. The
Foss v. National Marine Fisheries Servicepublic domain
161 F.3d 584 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,330, 98 Cal. Daily Op.Serv. 8660,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,037 Richard D. FOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE; Steven Pennoyer, in hiscapacity as Regional Director, National Marine FisheriesService; Michael Kantor, in his capacity as Secretary ofCommerce; Department of Commerce, Defendants-Appellees. No.
Wherley v. Fosspublic domain
OPINION WOZNIAK, Chief Judge. This appeal is from the dismissal with prejudice of appellants’ complaint. The trial court dismissed on its own motion for failure to prosecute. We affirm. FACTS Appellants Wherley and respondent Foss were involved in an automobile collision on August 22, 1973. Three years later, the attorney for Wherleys began correspondence with Foss’s ins
Michael Foss, a Minor v. United Statespublic domain
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge: This Federal Tort Claims Act wrongful death action was brought by the widow and children of Glenn Foss, a private pilot who was killed when his small aircraft crashed at the airport at Fullerton, California. The district court’s findings of fact, which we paraphrase, recite that in 1968 the F.A.A. prepared a
Fagnant v. Fosspublic domain
Per Curiam. ¶ 1. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for reargument, an amicus curiae memorandum of law in support of that motion filed by the Attorney General’s Office, and plaintiff’s memorandum of law in opposition to the motion, we grant the motion for reargument, withdraw our opinion of March 15, 2013, and replace it with the instant opinion dismissing this appeal as untime
Bosworth v. Foss Maritime Companypublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000315 02-SEP-2016 09:35 AM SCWC-16-0000315 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I LARRY BOSWORTH, Petitioner/Claima
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00517-CV Michael J. GILL, Temporary Trustee of the Francz Hamilton Foss Testamentary Trust, Appellant v. Jutta BAUMGARTEN, Individually and as Surviving Heir of the Esta
State v. Fosspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Following a jury trial in the Superior Court, Washington County, the Defendant was convicted of robbery (Class A) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (Supp.1979). The sole issue on appeal is whether the finding of guilt is supported by sufficient evidence. On the evidence, the jury was justified in finding that theft of $40.00 was committed
Foss v. Williamspublic domain
993 So.2d 378 (2008) Michael L. FOSS, M.D. v. Dorothy WILLIAMS, Administratrix of the Estate of Peter D. Price, Deceased. No. 2007-IA-00615-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. September 25, 2008. Rehearing Denied November 13, 2008. Jason Edward Dare, Greenville, L. Carl Hagwood, Jackson, Bradley Keith Overcash, Greenville, attorneys for appellant.
FOSS, III, COLBY, PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1539 KA 09-02127 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, GREEN, PINE, AND GORSKI, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ORDER COLBY FOSS, III, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. COLBY FOSS, III, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
In re Complaint of Foss Maritime Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINÍON AND ORDER Greg N. Stivers, Judge, United States District Court This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Foss Atlantic, Inc., and Foss Maritime Company (“Foss”) (DN 100). The Commonwealth of Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (“KTC”) has responded (DN 104), and Foss has replied (DN 107). Fully briefed, the matter stands ripe for dec
371 B.R. 589 (2007) 2007 BNH 027 In re FELT MANUFACTURING CO., INC., f/k/a Foss Manufacturing Co., Inc., Debtor. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, on behalf of the bankruptcy estate of Felt Manufacturing Co., Inc., f/k/a Foss Manufacturing Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v. Stephen Foss, Patricia Foss, Jenifer Foss Smyth, Kevin Sexton, Douglas Kinney, Marcella Darling, John Smyth, Dennis Foss, David Rowell, Foss Family
Foss v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
521 F.Supp.2d 99 (2007) Andrew FOSS, Plaintiff, v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 06-153-P-S. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 8, 2007. *100 *101 Guy D. Loranger, Nichols & Webb, P.A., Saco, ME, for Plaintiff. Brian G. Muse, Susan Childers North, Lec
Loray Master Tenant, LLC v. Foss N.C. Mill Credit 2014 Fund I, LLC, 2021 NCBC 12. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION GASTON COUNTY 19 CVS 1024 LORAY MASTER TENANT, LLC, and JOSEPH LENIHAN, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANT
Foss v. New Orleans Terminal Co.public domain
LEMMON, Judge, concurs and assigns reasons. Martin Foss’ version of the events just before the accident and Mark Page’s version can only be reconciled to indicate that Martin secured relative control of a nervous horse, and instead of dismounting, as prudence would dictate, he waited for Mark while on the horse alongside the track with a train approaching. Under these facts I deem reasonable the inference