Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael Wayne Miller”
Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesotapublic domain
OPINION LILLEHAUG, Justice. In 1987, following a jury trial, the district court convicted appellant Michael Wayne 1 of first-degree murder for the stabbing death of Mona Armendariz and sentenced him to life in prison. We affirmed Wayne’s conviction. State v. Fenney (Wayne I),
Wayne v. Statepublic domain
CHUTICH, Justice. In 1987, Michael Wayne was convicted of first- and second-degree murder. Thirty years later, Wayne filed his ninth petition for postconviction relief, relying on recent lab reports that showed that the amount of male DNA found on the victim's body was insufficient for specific typing. Wayne argued that the forensic scientist's inability to match his DNA profile to the male DNA found on the victim's body established
J. Michael Teets, Comm. v. Wendy J. Millerpublic domain
Ketchum, Chief Justice: The action underlying this appeal was brought by Wendy J. Miller,1 John A, El-more, B. Wayne Thompson, Ovid Need, and Bonnie Haggerty, citizens of Hardy County (collectively “Hardy County Citizens”), respondents herein, seeking to remove two commissioners serving on the Hardy County Commission (“Commission” or “the Commission”), and to void the Commission’s purchase of a b
Reeder v. County of Waynepublic domain
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [25] HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, United States District Court Judge I. Introduction On January 16, 2015, Yasin Reeder (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint and Demand for Trial by Jury against Wayne County (“Defendant”). See Dkt. No. 1, p. 1 (Pg. ID No. 1). On January 30, 2015, Plaintiff s
Miller v. Lampertpublic domain
125 P.3d 1260 (2006) 340 Or. 1 Michael Wayne MILLER, Petitioner on Review, v. Robert LAMPERT, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent on Review. (CC 0007403M; CA A120055; SC S51716). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and submitted January 12, 2005. Decided January 12, 2006. Rankin Johnson IV, D
Schnapp v. Miller's Launch, Inc.public domain
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendant Miller's Launch, Inc. breached a duty of care it owed to plaintiff Wayne Schnapp pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (
Jackson v. Wayne Circuit Court Judgepublic domain
Per Curiam. *631This case is before us on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court for consideration of whether MCL 600.2963(8) is unconstitutional as it was applied to bar plaintiff's original complaint for superintending *800control. We conclude that it
Wieland v. Miller (In Re Miller)public domain
448 B.R. 551 (2011) In re David Wayne MILLER, II and Heather Leigh Miller, Debtors. Richard A. Wieland, United States Trustee, Plaintiff, v. David Wayne Miller, II and Heather Leigh Miller, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-10147-M. Adversary No. 09-01054-M. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma. April 29, 2011. *555 Kath
City of Wayne v. Anthony Wayne Millerpublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CITY OF WAYNE, FOR PUBLICATION June 6, 2024 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee,
Schnapp v. Miller's Launch, Inc.public domain
Schnapp v Miller's Launch, Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 02172) Schnapp v Miller's Launch, Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 02172 Decided on March 23, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Acosta, J.
Michael v. Millerpublic domain
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Michael v. Miller, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4543.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or oth
McDonald v. Millerpublic domain
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 14) KANE, Senior District Judge. Former Denver mayoral political appointee Wayne McDonald filed suit after being accused of sexually harassing a Denver police officer and fired as a result. The appointee claims the allegations were false and that his termination, which occurred before any opportunity for a hearing to clear his name, constituted a breach of his
Eric Wayne Dempsey v. State of Iowapublic domain
ZAGER, Justice. Eric Dempsey appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief. He maintains he received ineffective assistance of counsel as a result of counsel’s failure to accurately inform him of the terms and potential sentencing outcomes of a first plea offer proposed by the State. He asserts that because counsel misinformed him of the terms of the first plea offe
Walczak v. LABOR WORKS-FORT WAYNE, LLCpublic domain
966 N.E.2d 642 (2012) Brandy L. WALCZAK, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Appellant, v. LABOR WORKS-FORT WAYNE, LLC, d/b/a Labor Works, Appellee. No. 02A04-1109-PL-509. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 5, 2012. *643 Philip J. Gibbons, Jr., Andrew G. Jones, Gibbons Jones, P.C., Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys
Wayne Schnapp v. Miller's Launchpublic domain
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 87 SSM 43 Wayne Schnapp, Respondent, v. Miller's Launch, Inc., Appellant. Submitted by Michael E. Stern, for appellant. Submitted by Paul T. Hofmann, for respondent. * * * * * * * * * *
Randol Mill Pharmacy v. Millerpublic domain
Justice Lehrmann, delivered the opinion of the Court. After suffering a severe adverse reaction to a compounded drug administered by her physician, Stacey Miller sued the compounding pharmacy and several of its licensed-pharmacist employees. We are asked whether Miller’s claims against these defendants are health care liability claims subject to the requirements of the Texas Medical Liability Act. If they are
Miller v. Astruepublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Ruth B. Miller appeals the judgment of the district court denying Miller’s motion for summary judgment, granting the motion for summary judgment of the Commissioner of Social Security, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Miller’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434. We review the distr
John Joseph Benge v. Wayne Michael Lautenbachpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1267 Filed April 12, 2023 JOHN JOSEPH BENGE, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. WAYNE MICHAEL LAUTENBACH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wayne County, Elisabeth Reynoldson, Judge. Wayne Michael Lautenbach appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss for lack of
State of Iowa v. Shane Wayne Michaelpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-0803 Filed November 2, 2022 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. SHANE WAYNE MICHAEL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, David Porter (Trial) and Joseph Seidlin (Motion to Continue), Judges. Shane Michael appeals his conviction of willful in
CRANE COMPOSITES, INC. v. WAYNE FARMS, LLC Et Al.public domain
Thompson, Chief Justice. The question for decision in this case is whether OCGA § 9-11-68, a tort reform, fee-shifting statute, can be applied to a negligence action in which the injury occurred prior to the effective date of the statute, but in which the action was filed after that date. We answer this question affirmatively and, in so doing, we overrule L. P. Gas Ind