Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Michael W. McAlister and Tina C. McAlister”
Shawn Wayne Whatley v. Warden, Ware State Prisonpublic domain
Case: 13-15117 Date Filed: 09/23/2015 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-15117 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cv-00142-LGW-JEG SHAWN WAYNE WHATLEY,
State of Tennessee v. Treca Finchumpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 26, 2002 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TRECA FINCHUM Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 8071 Richard R. Vance, Judge No. E2001-01072-CCA-R3-CD October 2, 2002 A Sevier County jury convicted
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Foote v. Ludlow School Committeepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1069 STEPHEN FOOTE, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors; MARISSA SILVESTRI, individually and as Guardian and next friend of B.F. and G.F., minors, Plaintiffs, Appellants, JONATHAN FELICIANO; SANDRA SALMERON, Plaintiffs, v. LUDLOW SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TODD GAZDA, forme
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Hickey v. Digital Equipment Corporationpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge HALL and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined. OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: This is a ease brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against Digital Equipment Corporation (Digital) b
DeBoer v. Snyderpublic domain
MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. “The great tides and currents which engulf the rest of men do not turn aside in their course to pass the judges hy.” Benjamin Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921) The author of the majority opinion has drafted what would make an engrossing TED Talk or, possibly, an introductory lecture in Political Phi
Valeria Tanco v. William Haslampublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0275p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ 14-1341 ┐ │ APRIL DEBOER
Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods LLCpublic domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams