⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michael Stephen Brothers v. County of Riverside”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-10-03 · Published · cited 75× · 838 F.3d 1039; 2016 WL 5720529
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs in the two cases before us on appeal complain that they were denied due process when the Board of County Commissioners of Elbert County (the Board) required them to rezone their properties before they could subdivide them. They allege that after the Board lost the documents reflecting the prior comprehensive zoning ordinance, it created new
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993-03-16 · Published · cited 21× · 825 F. Supp. 686; 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 789; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3098; 1993 WL 209656
825 F.Supp. 686 (1993) John S. SEAL, Jr. v. RIVERSIDE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, et al. Civ. No. 91-2021. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 16, 1993. *687 *688 P. Stephen Lerario, Michael P. Giles, Thomas C. Marshall, Lerario & Associates, John Randolph Prince, III, Fellhei
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
District Court, S.D. California · 2005-02-28 · Published · cited 6× · 359 F. Supp. 2d 994; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7358; 2005 WL 627577
359 F.Supp.2d 994 (2005) Michael CROWE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. And Related Actions No. 99CV0241 R (RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 28, 2005. *995 *996 *997
District Court, S.D. California · 2004-02-17 · Published · cited 13× · 303 F. Supp. 2d 1050; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8817; 2004 WL 329390
303 F.Supp.2d 1050 (2004) Michael CROWE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. And Related Actions No. 99CV0241 R(RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 17, 2004. *1057 Milton J Silverman, Jr., Law Offices of Milton Silverman, San Diego, CA, counsel for Crowe plaintiffs.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Washington Supreme Court · 2018-04-19 · Published · cited 51× · 415 P.3d 212; 190 Wash. 2d 483
MADSEN, J. *487¶ 1 In 2008, an employee of Jefferson County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Jefferson Transit) caused a vehicle collision with Michael Gilmore. Gilmore brought a *215personal injury suit against Jefferson Transit for injuries he alleg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-12-23 · Published · cited 48× · 132 F.3d 512; 1997 WL 784487
132 F.3d 512 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9610, 98 Cal. DailyOp. Serv. 1615,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,379Rolland Richard HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The COUNTY OF SHASTA; State of California; Jim Pope, asSheriff; A.C. Chaidez, Officer; and H. Smith,Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16704. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argu
California Supreme Court · 1994-05-12 · Published · cited 312× · 872 P.2d 143; 7 Cal. 4th 725; 29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 804; 1994 Cal. LEXIS 2490; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3404; 94 Daily Journal DAR 6396
7 Cal.4th 725 (1994) 872 P.2d 143 29 Cal. Rptr.2d 804 JOHN M. MOREHART et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S030829. Supreme Court of California. May 12, 1994. *730 COUNSEL David Nawi, County Counsel, Ste
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2021-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
12/07/2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE June 3, 2021 Session1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. URSHAWN ERIC MILLER Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals Circuit Court for Madison County No. 16-435 Donald H. Allen, Judge _________
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01717
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-11-20 · Published · cited 75× · 535 S.W.3d 829
11/20/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 1, 2017 Session Heard at Nashville1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SEDRICK CLAYTON Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 1203160 Carolyn W.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
04/18/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 11, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WALTER COLLINS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 15-00211 Paula Skahan, Judge ________________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-05-23 · Published · cited 92× · 823 F.3d 759; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9366; 2016 WL 2956968
DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Appellants purchased financial instruments, mainly issued by the defendant banks, that carried a rate of return indexed to. the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which approximates the average rate at which a group of designated banks can borrow money. Appellees, 16 of the world’s largest banks (“the Banks”), were on the panel of banks that determined LIBOR each business day based, in par
California Supreme Court · 2010-11-18 · Published · cited 23× · 242 P.3d 1020; 50 Cal. 4th 1370; 118 Cal. Rptr. 3d 95
50 Cal.4th 1370 (2010) 118 Cal. Rptr. 3d 95 242 P.3d 1020 AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. S153852. Supreme Court o
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 19, 2016 JAMES ROBERT WILSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 98-D-3052 Steve Dozier, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2016-00860-CCA-R3-HC – Filed November 2, 2016 ___________________