Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00238-CR ___________________________ ERON MICHAEL SPIVEY, Appellant V. THE STATE O

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-17-00238-CR ERON MICHAEL SPIVEY, Appellant § On Appeal from the 297th District Court § of Tarrant County (1443186D) V. § April 25, 2019

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA MICHAEL SPIVEY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-1849 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed October 6, 2014. An app

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICHAEL J. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. BELINDA SPIVEY, Appellee. No. 4D21-1563 [March 24, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; J

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6490 Doc: 52 Filed: 04/20/2026 Pg: 1 of 16 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6490 MANDRIEZ SPIVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL BRECKON, Warden of USP Lee; JAMES PHELPS, Captain, USP Lee, JAME

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th of August 2015 by Appellate Defender for Appointment of the Office of the Appellate Defender to Represent Jacob Mark Spivey as Appellee: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th of August 2015."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th of July 2015 by Defendant's attorney to Withdraw: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of August 2015."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 23rd of April 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015." Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd of April 2015 by State of NC in this

45 So.3d 51 (2010) Michael SPIVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D09-3691. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 7, 2010. Rehearing Denied September 28, 2010. *52 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee and James T. Miller, Special Assistant Public Defender, Jackso

BY THE COURT: A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.

ORDER In 1994 a jury found Michael Spivey guilty of felony murder; he was sentenced to 45 years’ imprisonment. His murder conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. See People v. Spivey, No. 1-94-2607, slip op. (Ill.App.Ct. May. 15, 1997) (unpublished order). After exhausting his state post-conviction remedies, Spivey petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, claiming, among other things, that his confessi

MARTIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Majority describes this case as raising the question of whether “deception by law enforcement” during the search of a home violates the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Among other things, the Fourth Amendment'protects the “right of the people to be secure in their [ ] houses,” and requires that warrants allowing a home to be searched, issue “up

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael A. Spivey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging disability discrimination and retaliation. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Spivey’s informal

OPINION FRIEDLANDER, Judge. Following a jury trial, Robert Spivey was convicted of Driving While Suspended,1 a class A misdemeanor. On appeal, Spivey presents one issue for our review: Did the trial court abuse its discretion in instructing the jury? We affirm. On March 13, 2008, Spivey was driving on a public highway when Officer David Lowe

ERVIN, Judge. Defendants AMS Staff Leasing, Dallas National Insurance Co., and Crawford & Company1 appeal from a Commission order awarding Plaintiff Dennis Ray Spivey medical and disability benefits. On appeal, Defendants argue that the Commission erred by determining that they were bound by the Industrial Commission Form 60 which they had previously filed and by failing to determine that Defen

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Represented by counsel, Plaintiff Michelle L. Spivey ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner," or "Defendant") denying her applications for disability insurance benefits (

PER CURIAM: Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court orders not granting him approval to file a complaint pursuant to the court’s order enjoining him from filing complaints without prior approval of the court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Willis v. Spivey, No. 4:05-mc-00009-H (E.D.N

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, *Page 2 the Full Commission reverses in part and affirms in part the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Phillips and enters th

PER CURIAM: Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court orders not granting him approval to file a complaint pursuant to the court’s order enjoining him from filing complaints without prior approval of the court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Willis v. Spivey, No. 4:05-mc-00009-H (E.D.N

814 N.E.2d 925 (2004) 351 Ill. App.3d 763 286 Ill.Dec. 699 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kavin SPIVEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-03-1810. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. August 5, 2004. *926 Michael J. Pelletier, Denise D.