Cases

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 3737749 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/12/2015 4:19:03 PM

ACCEPTED 04-14-00735-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/20/2015 1:49:45 PM

J-A26037-24 2025 PA Super 80 ROBERT P. MILLER AND KENT S. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ROCKWELL : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : ROBERT M. BUNTING AND PAULINE : BUNTING, HIS WIFE, AND DOLLAR : No. 351 WDA 2024 BANK, FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

AP-77,039 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS February 6, 2015 Transmitted 2/5/2015 3:02:57 PM Accepted 2/6/2015 8:59:58 AM

398 Mass. 417 (1986) 497 N.E.2d 626 PATRICIA E. BROPHY vs. NEW ENGLAND SINAI HOSPITAL, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. May 7, 1986. September 11, 1986. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Frank E. Reardon (Nancy R. Rice & Judith A. Johnson with hi

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Beginning in 2010, hundreds of plaintiffs filed personal-injury suits against the drug manufacturer Merck Sharp & Dohme, alleging that the osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused them to suffer serious thigh bone fractures. Each Plaintiff brought a state-law tort claim alleging that Merck failed to add an adequate w

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Related to ECF Nos. 4, 75, 516, 923, & 938 MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. HOUSER, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY, AND VENUE... 355 II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 356 A. Factual and Computation Stipulations of the Parties... 356 B. Facts Found Due to this Court’s Application of Collateral Estopp

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 680–778 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

Case: 25-10534 Document: 195 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 2, 2025

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B.  STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official

65 F.Supp.2d 431 (1999) Isabel G. ANDRADE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Phillip J. CHOJNACKI, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. W-96-CA-139 to W-96-CA-147, W-96-CA-373. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Waco Division. July 1, 1999. *432 *433 *434 <

490 A.2d 104 (1983) William Henry FLAMER, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: June 24, 1982. Re-submitted Following Supplemental Briefing: December 6, 1982. Decided: February 7, 1983. Opinion on Death Sentence Submitted Following Supplemental Briefing and Argument: M

ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST

ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER