Cases

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This antitrust case'arises from allegations that Defendants fixed the prices of *862cathode ray tubes (“CRTs”), which were common components of television sets and computer moni

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1329 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WESTERN POCAHONTAS PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Parcel ID No. 6-5F-1 (Terminated: 1/11/2018), 1-31-10, 1-30-8, 5-26-2, Defendant - Appellant, and D. LANE MCMILLION, Parcel I

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

80 F.3d 1220 64 USLW 2692, 131 Lab.Cas. P 11,567,11 IER Cases 910 Sherry AARON; Deborah D. Barber; Dolores V. Beauchamp;Patricia Beauchamp; Brenda Becker; Eva M. Becker; Alice M.Cox; Billi Jo Crews; Betty Doyle; Patty Dull; Jessie F.Dunlap; Lois I. Elseman; Augusta Emmons; Cathy M.Ethington; Carol J. Foster; Joseph E. Foster; Virginia M.Foster; Donald Fritchey; Melissa C. Galbraith;

478 F.Supp.2d 624 (2007) In re EPHEDRA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Pertains To Stafford v. Weight Watchers Inc. et al, No. 05 Civ. 3021. No. 04 M.D. 1598(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 26, 2007. *625 *626 Anne Andrews, Andrews Kurth LLP, Dallas, TX, Catherine T

785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton

762 F.Supp.2d 942 (2010) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. American National Insurance Company, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arthur Andersen, LLP, et al., Defendants. No. MDL-1446, Civil Action Nos. H-01-3624, G-03-0967. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109, the plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and similarly-situated individuals, sued their former employer, the Brown Shoe Company (“Brown Shoe”). Brown Shoe moved to dismiss the case on statute of limitations grounds, but the district court

562 So.2d 868 (1990) STATE of Louisiana v. George B. BROWN. No. 89 K 2678. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 4, 1990. Dissenting Opinion June 15, 1990. Motion to Accept Application Granted; Rehearing Denied June 28, 1990. *869 William Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Bryan Bush, Dist. Atty., E. Sue Bernie,

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

GREGORY, Chief Judge: This appeal arises from a condemnation proceeding commenced by Appellee Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC ("MVP"). MVP is a natural gas company that was authorized by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") to exercise the right of eminent domain in order to construct a pipeline. The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia granted MVP partial summary judgment on its right

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to show causation is denied; their motion to exclude the opinions of Wesley Dennis, M.D. is granted in part and denied in part; and their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to individual defendant Michnal for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied.

489 F.Supp.2d 982 (2007) Frank Jarvis ATWOOD, Petitioner, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, et al., Respondents. No. CV-98-116-TUC-JCC. United States District Court, D. Arizona. May 1, 2007. *983 *984 *985 *986

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed