Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael Ray Brooks”
Brooks v. Liptrotpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Ray Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Liptrot, No.
Johnson v. Brookspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Allen Ray Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Br
Ben Campbell v. Ray Clarkpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers This accelerated interlocutory appeal arises from a defamation lawsuit filed by appellee Ray Clark against appellants Ben Campbell, individually and d/b/a My Right to Know, . myrighttoknow.org, and Your Right to Know, and Your Right to Know, Inc. Appellants moved to dismiss the lawsuit under the
Ex Parte Brookspublic domain
The petitioners, Jimmy Lee Brooks, Jr., and Michael David Carruth, filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge George R. Greene to recuse himself from presiding over their capital-murder trials. *Page 397 The petitioners were indicted on four counts of murder made capital because the victim, 12-year-old William Brett Bowyer, was less than 14 years of age and because the victim was murdered during the course of a kidnapping, b
Michael Ray Orr v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-19-00398-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS MICHAEL RAY ORR, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
Ronnie Ray Brooks v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2015 No. 04-15-00510-CR Ronnie Ray BROOKS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Ronnie Ray Brooks v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-15-00510-CR Ronnie Ray BROOKS, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appe
Michael Ray Reed, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-17-00360-CR MICHAEL RAY REED, JR., APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 320th District Court
Michael R. Sarratt v. Brooks Run South Mining, LLCpublic domain
FILED April 20, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
in Re Commitment of Ronnie Ray Brookspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00357-CV ____________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF RONNIE RAY BROOKS __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Mont
Board of Trustees v. Brookspublic domain
OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. Patricia A. Brooks, Donald G. Brooks, Sharon Gammon, Sandra K. McDaniel, James N.O. Bealmear, Timothy Ray Mos-by, and Joseph J. Schitter ("the Petitioners") filed a complaint in Warrick Cireuit Court, requesting an injunction against the imposition of property taxes for the purpose of paying for the construction of a new public library. The trial court granted the injunction. The B
Michael Ray Bonds v. Statepublic domain
OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. Introduction In a single issue, Appellant Michael Ray Bonds asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The affidavit supporting the search warrant articulates probable cause for a search of 401 Barker Street, Bowie, Montague Co
State v. Brookspublic domain
439 S.E.2d 234 (1994) STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Franklin BROOKS. No. 9226SC1163. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 1, 1994. *235 Attorney Gen. Michael F. Easley by Asst. Atty. Gen. LaVee Hamer Jackson, Raleigh, for State. Appellate Defender Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., and Asst. Appellate Defender Susan G.
v. Brookspublic domain
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT MONDAY, MAY 6, 2019 "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the changes are announced. Click on the case number to vie
Michael Ray Bonds v. Statepublic domain
02-11-086-CR
Napleton v. Ray Buick, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE GREIMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff Edward F. Napleton sought a declaratory judgment establishing his rights regarding an option to purchase certain real estate that he leased from defendant Ray Buick, Inc. The circuit court granted summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor, determining that plaintiff p
David Schied v. Michael Ray Merrittpublic domain
1 @»-~/~/5~004<@@@\/ IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS F\L\=_o \N PEALS IN THE 'sTATE oF TEXAS b `SWCURTOFAP HOUS"'OM_ TEXAS In the Estate of Michael Edward Schied, DEC 2 3 205 Deceased CHNST H .~ - ‘NE y D'a`V-id Schied, Case No. 434875 CLERK Interested Party Plaintiff/ Principal Co-Heir vs M'ichael Merritt (named “ex_ecutor”) and Wynde Merritt (“co-executor” by Janette Renee Smith proxy) Robin Apostolakis David Munson Co-Defendants/Appellees CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC
In Re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
738 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2010) In re CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This document relates to All Actions. Master File No. CV-07-5944 SC. MDL No. 1917. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 30, 2010. *1013 Gilmur Roderick Murray, Murray & Howard, LLP, Geoffrey Conrad Rushing, Richard Alexander Saveri, Giann
Brooks v. Piecuchpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United . States District Judge INTRODUCTION Pro se Plaintiff Michael Brooks (“Plaintiff’), a prisoner housed at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, filed this action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. 1). Presently before the Court is Defendant Piecuch’s and Defendant Esgrow’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment.
Michael Ray Diaz v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-05-0168-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 31, 2005 ______________________________ MICHAEL RAY DIAZ, APPELLANT V.