Cases

10/14/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 17, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNETH RAY NILES Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. 22CC-2015-CR-176 Suzanne M. Lockert-Mash, Judge No. M2023-01603-CCA-R3-CD T

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This antitrust case'arises from allegations that Defendants fixed the prices of *862cathode ray tubes (“CRTs”), which were common components of television sets and computer moni

Cite as 2023 Ark. 165 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-95 Opinion Delivered: November 16, 2023 RELIANCE HEALTH CARE, INC.; OVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RHC OPERATIONS, INC.; EAGLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; GNNC, INC., [NO. 47BCV-19-236] D/B/A GOSNELL THERAPY AND LIVING; SRCNC, INC., D/B/A THE HONORABLE TAN

618 F.Supp.2d 96 (2009) In re: NEURONTIN MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Bentley v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11997-PBS. Bulger v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-11426-PBS. Dixon v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11998-PBS. McGee v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-12593-PBS. Owens v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11017-PBS. Pursey v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-10106-PBS. Roberson

704 S.E.2d 529 (2011) Ralph ASHLEY, Jean Ashley, Alexander Augoustides, Carolyn Auman, Luther T. Barber, Sylvia Barber, D.H. Beam, Jay Belk, Pam Belk, Anthony J. Bolo, Jr., Marion J. Bonnom, Keith Bost, Sherry Bost, Ricky Boyd, Michael P. Bralkowski, Rhonda W. Bralkowski, Jim Buchanan, Betsy Buchanan, Peggy Burchett, Jerry Burkhart, Jeri Burkhart, Bobby Byerly, Patsy Byerly, Jim Cameron, Betsy Cameron, Brad Cates, Jodi Cates, Cory Cooper, Amanda Cooper,

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti

264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 11-275L (Filed: January 11, 2019) ) BIG OAK FARMS, INC., et al., ) ) Fifth Amendment Taking Claims; Plaintiffs, ) Motion to Dismiss; 28 U.S.C. § 2501; ) T

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1329 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WESTERN POCAHONTAS PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Parcel ID No. 6-5F-1 (Terminated: 1/11/2018), 1-31-10, 1-30-8, 5-26-2, Defendant - Appellant, and D. LANE MCMILLION, Parcel I

We are asked to consider whether a nonsuit order is void to the extent it dismisses claims not encompassed by the motion for nonsuit. We hold the order is not void and therefore dismiss the appeals of 155 appellants against nine appellees. Factual and Procedural Background This appeal arises out of a mass tort action that consolidated eighteen cases involving over eight thousand plaintiffs and over thirty defendants. The notice of appeal and t

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

433 B.R. 419 (2010) In re LAKETOWN WHARF MARKETING, CORPORATION, n/k/a Laketown Wharf Marketing, LLC, Debtor. Corus Construction Venture, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corporation, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-40692-LMK. Adversary No. 09-04009-LMK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division. July 19, 2010.

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei

2020 IL App (1st) 191648 No. 1-19-1648 Opinion filed September 14, 2020 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINO

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Repor

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. This putative class and collective action is before the Court on several related motions. Defendant Charter Communications, LLC (“Charter”) moves (Doc. No. 183) for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiffs’ request for class relief in their claim for unpaid overtime wages under the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act (“Kentucky Act”), Ky.Re