Cases

771 F.Supp.2d 42 (2011) UNITED STATES, ex rel. WESTRICK, Plaintiffs, v. SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR, INC. et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-280 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 24, 2011. *44 Stephen M. Kohn, Anthony C. Munter, David K. Colapinto, Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, P.C., Eric D. Snyder,

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before BLACK, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. CARNES, Circuit Judge: Our previous opinion in this case, published at 242 F.3d 996 (11th Cir.2001), is vacated. In its place, on petition for rehearing, we substitute this revised opinion. No member of the Court having requested a poll, we d

MEMORANDUM OPINION ALAN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before this Court is a Motion by the United States (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or the “United States”) to Compel Production of Documents and Other Tangible Items in the Possession of James W. Murray and to Compel the Deposition of James W. Murray (“Motion”) [315] and the Memor

*7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge The government brought this action against defendants Second Chance Body Armor, Inc. and related entities (collectively “Second Chance”), Toyobo Co., Ltd. and Toy-obo America, Inc. (collectively “Toyobo”), and individual defendants Thomas Baehner, Jr., Richard Davis, Karen MeCraney,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. The United States brought this action against defendants Toyobo Co., Ltd. and Toyobo America, Inc. (collectively “Toyobo”), individual defendants Thomas Bachner, Jr. and Richard Davis, and others 1 alleging violations of

CARNES, Circuit Judge: Michael W. Bass appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County in his lawsuit claiming race discrimination in violation of Title VII and the Equal Protection Clause, as well as retaliation in violation of Title VII. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for a jury trial

602 F.Supp. 595 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, v. RUBBISH REMOVAL, INC.; Onondaga Environmental Systems, Inc.; Leaseway Haulers, Inc.; A & T Haulers, Inc.; Ace Sanitary Haulers, Inc.; Raite Rubbish Removal Corp.; Feher Rubbish Removal, Inc.; L. Michael Blumin; Joseph Tripoli, Senior; Joseph Tripoli, Junior; Francis Schrader; Thomas O'Connor, Senior; and Winfred Tousley, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, v. John MAGGIO, Defen

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0276p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - EMILY KROLL, -

685 F.Supp.2d 129 (2010) UNITED STATES, ex rel. WESTRICK, Plaintiffs, v. SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-280 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 23, 2010. *131 Stephen M. Kohn, Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, P.C., Anthony C. Munter, David K. Colapinto, Kohn Kohn

OPINION & ORDER SWEET, District Judge. Pursuant to the transfer order from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL Panel”), entered on October 4, 2 012, 41 actions stemming from the May 18, 2012 initial public offering (“IPO”) of Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook” or the “Company”) are presently before this Court. The cases include class actions against defendant Faceboo

546 U.S. 356 (2006) CENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE ET AL. v. KATZ, LIQUIDATING SUPERVISOR FOR WALLACE'S BOOKSTORES, INC. No. 04-885. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, 2005. Decided January 23, 2006. *358 William E. Thro, State Solicitor General of Virginia, argued the cause for petitio

2 A.3d 76 (2009) VIKING PUMP, INC., Plaintiff, v. CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Warren Pumps LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Century Indemnity Company, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Viking Pump, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. John Crane, Inc., Houdaille Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendants. C.A. No. 1465-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware.

MEDINA, Circuit Judge: This class action appeal1 was first argued before the present panel of judges of this Court on April 27, 1977. Plaintiff, who purchased 300 shares of common stock of Franklin New York Corporation on the over-the-counter market in New York City on May 9, 1974, seeks a recovery of money damages for an alleged security fraud against the independent accountants and certain form

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of Defendants Larry Goldstone and Clarence G. Simmons and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed May 21, 2012 (Doc. 35)(“Goldstone & Simmons MTD”); (ii) the Defendant Jane Starrett’s Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of P

763 F.Supp.2d 423 (2011) In re BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Securities Action, 08 Civ. 2793 Derivative Action, 07 Civ. 10453 ERISA Action, 08 Civ. 2804. No. 08 MDL 1963. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 19, 2011. *439 Keller Rohrback LLP, by:

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS