Cases

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00374-CR NO. 14-22-00375-CR IN RE MICHAEL R. BAILEY, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 240th District Court

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Dismissed and Opinion filed July 14, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00486-CR IN RE MICHAEL R. BAILEY, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-3620 _____________________________ MICHAEL R. JAFFE, Appellant, v. MARVIN BAILEY, Administrator, and NORTHEAST FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, Facility Respondent, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge.

Bailey, Judge. *779 Case Summary [1] William C. Goodwin ("Goodwin") was awarded $9,130,000.00 in compensatory and punitive damages upon his tort claims against Michael R. Krohn ("Krohn"). Krohn now appeals, presenting the sole issue of whether he is entitled to a new tri

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge Attorneys Michael R. Needle and Merle Royce represented a group of plaintiffs in a RICO action filed in this court and settled in 2013. See Amari et al. v. Burgess et al. , No. 07 CV 1425 (N.D. Ill.). Both Needle and Royce are entitled to a share of attorneys' fees earned in that case. Before those funds were paid out, Royce brought this interpleader action against

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Milton I. Shadur, Senior United States District Judge When this multiparty declaratory judgment action brought by Chicago lawyer Merle Royce (“Royce”) came to this Court’s calendar via this District Court’s computer-driven random assignment system, the case did not appear to pose an unduly daunting task. To be sure, it called for three determinations as to various individuals’

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Milton I. Shadur, Senior United States District Judge Merle L. Royce (“Royce”) brought this interpleader action to determine the proper distribution'of settlement funds resulting from a civil RICO suit (the “Amari litigation”) in which he and Michael R. Needle (“Needle”) served as plaintiffs’ counsel. Aligned with Royce are 15 of the 16 prevailing plaintiff

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 6, 2010 Session AMANDA ELLIOTT v. R. MICHAEL COBB Interlocutory Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-05-436 Donald H. Allen, Judge No. W2009-00961-SC-S09-CV - Filed September 23, 2010 The issue presented in this interlocutory appeal is whether a plaintiff in a medical ma

AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.

83 F.3d 431 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Leo

OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: Appellant, Raymond Dale Payne, appeals from the April 13, 2016 Order denying his Petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 - 9546. After careful review, we reverse the decision of the PCRA court and grant Appellant a new degree-of-guilt hearing. In 1977, Appellant pled guilty to murder generally, an

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Intervenor-Appellant, the Committee to Elect Pete Dinelli Mayor (the “Commit *1241 tee”), appeals from the district court’s ruling that a provision of the Albuquerque City Charter limiting campaign contributions is unconstitutional.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Robert Gene Bailey appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This products liability action is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ two motions (Doc. Nos. 24 & 39) to remand the case to state court. Twelve individual Plaintiffs seek to hold four inter-related corporations liable, under Missouri tort law, for the manufacture and sale of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”), environmental and dieta

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. *159 ¶ 1 In this original proceeding, we consider the scope of the physician-patient privilege in a medical-malpractice action. Section 13-90-107(1)(d), C.R.S. (2017), prohibits certain medical providers from revealing, in testimony or

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Robert Gene Bailey appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and

05/28/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 2, 2024 Session HEATHER MARIE BAILEY v. DANIEL MICHAEL BAILEY Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Warren County No. 21-DV-9505 L. Craig Johnson, Judge1 ______

CASANUEVA, Judge. The Appellants seek review óf a final judgment entered after a bench trial on their claims against the various Appellees for breach of fiduciary duty, defamátion, slander per se, violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), conspiracy, and tortious interference as to several individuals and entities. In this appeal, the Appellants

285 B.R. 15 (2002) In re Jonathan King BAILEY, Debtor. Diana Lynn Bailey, Plaintiff, v. Jonathan King Bailey, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-05230-M, Adversary No. 02-0030-M. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma. November 8, 2002. *16 James Potts, Jr., Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff. Carl A. Barnes, Tulsa, OK, for Def