Cases

434 B.R. 852 (2010) In re Todd Allen ICHIDA and Elizabeth Kimberly Ichida, Debtors. James E. Perry, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Todd Allen Ichida, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-53655. Adversary No. 08-2222. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, at Columbus. August 30, 2010. *854 J. Matthew Fisher, Allen, Kueh

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. MILLETT, Circuit Judge, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge: In 2007-2008, the national economy went into a severe recession due in significant part to a dramatic decline in the housing market. That downturn pushed two central players in the United States’ housing mortgage market—the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae” or “Fannie”) and the Feder

JUDGMENT Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge Millett and Senior Circuit Judge Ginsburg. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Brown. Per Curiam These causes came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and were argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is ORDERED and ADJUDG

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 15, 2016 Decided February 21, 2017 No. 14-5243 PERRY CAPITAL LLC, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF INVESTMENT FUNDS FOR WHICH IT ACTS AS INVESTMENT MANAGER, APPELLANT v. STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ET AL., APPELLEES Consol

545 U.S. 677 (2005) VAN ORDEN v. PERRY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF TEXAS AND CHAIRMAN, STATE PRESERVATION BOARD, ET AL. No. 03-1500. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 2, 2005. Decided June 27, 2005. *679 Erwin Chemerinsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were

OPINION STATON, Judge. Michael Perry appeals the involuntary termination of his parental rights. His child, almost four when his paréntal' rights were terminated, was taken into the custody of the Elkhart Office of Family and Children when she was six months old because her parents did not adequately care for her. The only financial support Perry ever provided his daughter was to buy diapers four or fiv

MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Bronnimann Motions THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court are defendant Roland Bronnimann’s (“Bronnimann”) Motion to Dismiss the Cargill complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and the Car-gill plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Roland *64Bronnimann’s testimony.1 U

LUI, J. *1254Defendant Justin Lee Perry filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.18,1 after serving over three years of his sentence for grand theft from the person of another. His original six-year sentence was the result of a plea agreement, pursuant to which the People dismissed ot

549 N.E.2d 44 (1989) EVANSVILLE STATE HOSPITAL, Robert Heyne, Acting Superintendent, Indiana Department of Mental Health, Dennis R. Jones, Commissioner, Appellants, v. Mildred PERRY, Appellee. Indiana State Employees' Appeals Commission, Barbara Curran, Chairperson, Non-Appealing Respondent below. No. 73A01-8908-CV-298. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. December 4, 1

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE No. 18-15380 COUNCIL, INC.; SIERRA CLUB; CONSUMER FEDERATION OF D.C. Nos. AMERICA; TEXAS RATEPAYERS’ 3:17-cv-03404-VC ORGANIZATION TO SAVE 3:17-cv-03406-VC ENERGY; PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA; CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION; ST

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

860 N.E.2d 551 (2006) 307 Ill.Dec. 897 Perry J. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Timothy E. LEVSTIK, Individually and Doing Business as Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, an Illinois General Partnership, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants. No. 1-05-3713. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. December 15, 2

Filed 2/18/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, B263124 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA387242) v. JUSTIN LEE PERRY, Defen

FAHEY, J.: *1264**393CPLR 908 provides that "[a] class action shall not be dismissed, discontinued, or compromised without the approval of the court," and that "[n]otice of the proposed dismissal, discontinuance, or compromise shall be given to all me

648 S.E.2d 318 (2007) 50 Va. App. 199 Aaron A. HOFFMAN, t/a Hoffman Construction Company v. James Milton CARTER, Jr. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. James Milton Carter, Jr. Record Nos. 2828-06-2, 2839-06-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. August 14, 2007. *321 Irving M. Blank (ParisBlank

423 B.R. 215 (2010) In re Will Clay PERRY, Debtor. David Wallace, Costa Bajjali, Jacquelyn Marie Wallace 1996 Sub-S Trust and Whitney Leigh Wallace 1996 Sub-S Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Will Clay Perry, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-32362-H4-11. Adversary No. 08-03299. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 3, 2010.

FIFTH DIVISION December 15, 2006 No. 1-05-3713 PERRY J. HOFFMAN, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, ) Cook County.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1731 Doc: 65 Filed: 05/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1731 MICHAEL A. SCOTT; RUDOLPH ARMSTRONG; AARON KESSLER; MARK MARINER; LAMAR MARTIN; JEFFREY MATTHEW WELSHONS; DESHAWN PENHA; AARON SILWONUK; ADAM

OPINION Bob Pemberton, Justice This appeal arises from an ongoing criminal prosecution that, as the district court observed, involves “unique circumstances” that “have been widely reported, argued, and discussed by many with no standing in the case.” 1 Whatever the focus of such commentary, o

OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Rudy Colon, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) by, among other things, failing to pay employees in accordance with minimum wage and overtime laws. On July 2, 2013, 2013 WL 3328223, the Court granted in part Plaintiff