Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “Michael M. Liesenfelder”
Sabah Shipyard Sdn. Bhd. v. M/V HARBEL TAPPERpublic domain
984 F.Supp. 569 (1997) SABAH SHIPYARD SDN. BHD., Plaintiff, v. M/V HARBEL TAPPER, in rem; L & C III, Ltd.; Industrial Maritime Carriers (Bahamas), Inc.; Rohde & Liesenfeld, Inc.; Rohde & Liesenfeld Pte., Ltd.; Rohde & Liesenfeld Sdn. Bhd.; Windrose Line; Intermarine Incorporated; Progressive Assurance Sdn. Bhd; and Malaysian Assurance Alliance Bhd., Defendants. No. CIV. A. G-95-046. Uni
Camfield v. City of Oklahoma Citypublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge This appeal arises from a well-publicized decision by the Oklahoma City Police Department (OCPD) to remove the Academy Award-winning film The Tin Drum from public access after a state judge opined in an ex parte hearing that the movie contained child pornography in violation of Oklahoma law. Michael Camfield, whose rented copy of the
Acxiom Corp. v. Axiom, Inc.public domain
27 F.Supp.2d 478 (1998) ACXIOM CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. AXIOM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 97-451-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. November 16, 1998. *479 *480 *481 Joanne Ceballos, Potter, A