Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Michael J Aprigliano”
Aprigliano v. American Honda Motor Co.public domain
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s (“Honda[’s]”) Motion to Dismiss ... (“Motion”) [ECF No. 30], filed August 30, 2013. On September 16, 2013, Plaintiffs, Thomas Aprigliano (“Aprigliano”) and Thomas Lucci (“Lucci”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed a Response in Opposition ... (“Response”) [ECF No. 31]. H
Preferred Mutual Insurance v. Ryanpublic domain
Casey, J. P. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Cheeseman, J.), entered April 2, 1990 in Albany County, which, inter alia, partially granted motions by certain defendants for summary judgment, and (2) from two judgments of said court, entered July 20, 1990 and August 9, 1990 in Albany County, which awarded counsel fees to said defendants. As the result of a brawl that occurred in the Town of
Sanchez-Knutson v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
ORDER DENYING FORD’S MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS, District Judge. THIS' CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford” or “Defendant”)’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 19]. The Court has carefully considered the Motion, Plaintiff Angela Sanchez-Knutson (“Plaintiff’)’s Response [DE 23], Defendant’s Reply [DE 25], arguments by counsel at the hearing on October 2, 2014
Melton v. Century Arms, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND . DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' This case is a products liability class action brought by owners of various rifles manufactured by Century Arms, Inc., Century International Arms Corporation, Century Arms of Vermont, Inc., and Century International Arms of Vermont, Inc, (collectively, “Century”). Plaintiffs all
797 F.Supp.2d 254 (2011) CITIBANK, N.A., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL, PLC, Defendant and Conterclaimant. No. 09 Civ. 8197(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 25, 2011. Gregory P. Joseph, Esq., Peter R. Jerdee, Esq., Sandra M. Lipsman, Esq., Rachel Cherington, Esq., Gregory P. Joseph Law Office LL
Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 63 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Stephen Hadley (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant suit against Defendant Kellogg Sales Company (“Defendant”) for allegedly misleading statements on Defendant’s food product packaging. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amen
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: In this consolidated, multi-district litigation (“MDL”), Plaintiffs1 are purchasers and users of a paint product called “Deck *778& Concrete Restore” or “Restore 10X” (collectively “Restore”), manufactured by Defendant Rust-Oleum Corporation (“Rust-O