⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Michael J Aprigliano”

District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013-10-28 · Published · cited 26× · 979 F. Supp. 2d 1331; 2013 WL 5788771; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154539
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, American Honda Motor Co., Inc.’s (“Honda[’s]”) Motion to Dismiss ... (“Motion”) [ECF No. 30], filed August 30, 2013. On September 16, 2013, Plaintiffs, Thomas Aprigliano (“Aprigliano”) and Thomas Lucci (“Lucci”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed a Response in Opposition ... (“Response”) [ECF No. 31]. H
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991-07-11 · Published · cited 1× · 175 A.D.2d 375; 572 N.Y.S.2d 447; 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9488
Casey, J. P. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Cheeseman, J.), entered April 2, 1990 in Albany County, which, inter alia, partially granted motions by certain defendants for summary judgment, and (2) from two judgments of said court, entered July 20, 1990 and August 9, 1990 in Albany County, which awarded counsel fees to said defendants. As the result of a brawl that occurred in the Town of
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014-10-07 · Published · cited 24× · 52 F. Supp. 3d 1223; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148186; 2014 WL 5139306
ORDER DENYING FORD’S MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS, District Judge. THIS' CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford” or “Defendant”)’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 19]. The Court has carefully considered the Motion, Plaintiff Angela Sanchez-Knutson (“Plaintiff’)’s Response [DE 23], Defendant’s Reply [DE 25], arguments by counsel at the hearing on October 2, 2014
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017-03-20 · Published · cited 16× · 243 F. Supp. 3d 1290; 2017 WL 1063449; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39507
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND . DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' This case is a products liability class action brought by owners of various rifles manufactured by Century Arms, Inc., Century International Arms Corporation, Century Arms of Vermont, Inc., and Century International Arms of Vermont, Inc, (collectively, “Century”). Plaintiffs all
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-05-25 · Published · cited 1× · 797 F. Supp. 2d 254; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56289; 2011 WL 2078211
797 F.Supp.2d 254 (2011) CITIBANK, N.A., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INTERNATIONAL, PLC, Defendant and Conterclaimant. No. 09 Civ. 8197(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 25, 2011. Gregory P. Joseph, Esq., Peter R. Jerdee, Esq., Sandra M. Lipsman, Esq., Rachel Cherington, Esq., Gregory P. Joseph Law Office LL
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-08-10 · Published · cited 58× · 273 F. Supp. 3d 1052
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 63 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Stephen Hadley (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant suit against Defendant Kellogg Sales Company (“Defendant”) for allegedly misleading statements on Defendant’s food product packaging. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amen
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016-01-07 · Published · cited 57× · 155 F. Supp. 3d 772; 88 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 669; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1841; 2016 WL 74671
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: In this consolidated, multi-district litigation (“MDL”), Plaintiffs1 are purchasers and users of a paint product called “Deck *778& Concrete Restore” or “Restore 10X” (collectively “Restore”), manufactured by Defendant Rust-Oleum Corporation (“Rust-O